Résumé
Nous avons conduit une expérience afin d’étudier l’impact des formulations des énoncés sur la résolution de problèmes arithmétiques additifs chez des enfants de 6 à 10 ans. Trois variables ont été contrôlées, toutes inter-sujets. Tous les problèmes suivaient le même patron sous-jacent — un état initial (Ei), deux transformations (T1 et T2), un état final (Ef) — mais l’inconnue était tantôt Ef (problèmes S1) tantôt Ei (S2). Les transformations étaient soit formulées en second (01) soit en premier (02). Enfin, la question se trouvait en position soit finale (Q1) soit initiale (Q2).
Cent quatre vingt douze sujets (64 six, huit et dix ans) ont été soumis chacun à huit problèmes de la même modalité. Les difficultés de calcul numérique étaient contrôlées de manière à les rendre approximativement «proportionnelles» à l’âge.
Les résultats obtenus à partir d’une analyse des scores puis des procédures mettent en évidence que: a) Les problèmes portant sur la recherche de l’état final (S1) sont facilement et précocement résolus alors qu’une nette progression se manifeste avec ceux S2. b) Le placement en tête des transformations (02) et de la question (Q2) entraîne un accroissement systématique et très significatif des scores. c) Les procédures utilisées pour la résolution sont, à 6 et 8 ans, très dépendantes des formulations.
Nous proposons une interprétation en termes de connaissances disponibles en M.L.T. et de limitations de la capacité de traitement en mémoire de travail.
Abstract
An experiment was carried out concerning arithmetical problem solving in children. Three between sujects variables were manipulated. All problems followed the same underlying pattern with an initial state (Ei), two additive transformations (T1 and T2), and a final state (Ef); yet the unknown state concerned either Ef (S1 problems) or Ei (S2 problems). The order of introducing the transformations was counterbalanced: either state first (O1 order) or transformations first (O2). Finally, the question was located either at the end of the problem (Q1) or at its beginning (Q2).
One hundred and ninety two subjects (64 six, eight, and ten year-olds) were submitted to 8 different problems of the same type. The difficulties of the numerical series were tentatively controlled on an atempt to render the computations roughly «proportional» to ages.
Quantitative and qualitative analysis were conducted. Results show that: a) Problems with final state unknown (S1) are solved more easily and early, whereas problems with initial state unknown (S2) are better solved as the children grow older. b) Introducing the transformations first (O2) and placing the question at the beginning of the problem-text (Q2) yields better performances c) The procedures used to solve the problems are clearly dependant on the wording of the problems.
An interpretation is proposed which takes in account both the knowledge available in L.T.M. and the limitations of working memory.
References
Abdi, H. (1985) Introduction au traitement statistique des données expérimentales (2 vol.), Dijon: Laboratoire de Psychologie, ronéo.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1982) The development of mental arithmetic: a chronometric approach. Developmental Psychology, 2, 213–236.
Ashcraft, M. H., Battaglia, J. (1978) Cognitive arithmetic: evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 527–538.
Ashcraft, M. H., Fierman, B. A. (1982) Mental addition in third, fourth, and sixth graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 216–234.
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. (1974) Working memory; In Bower G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation; New-York: Academic Press.
Bastien, C. (1984) Réorganisation et construction de schèmes dans la résolution de problèmes. Psychologie Française, 29 (3/4), 243–246.
Brainerd, C. J. (1983) Young children’s mental arithmetic errors: a working memory analysis. Child Development, 55, 812–830.
Bransford, J. D., Johnson, M. K. (1972) Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
Caillot, M. (1984) La résolution de problèmes de physique: représentations et stratégies. Psychologie Française, 29 (3/4), 257–262.
Carpenter, T. P., Hiebert, J., Moser, J. M. (1981) Problem structure and first grade children’s initial solution process for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 12, 27–39.
Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M. (1982) The development of addition and subtraction problem solving skills; In Carpenter T. P., Moser J. M., Romberg T. A. (Eds.); Addition and subtraction: a cognitive perspective; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Case, R. (1982) General developmental influences on the acquisition of elementary concepts and algorithms in arithmetic; In Carpenter T. P., Moser J. M., Romberg T. A. (Eds.); Addition and substraction: a cognitive perspective; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Case, R., Kurland, D. M., Goldberg, J. (1982) Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.
Chi, M. T. H. (1978) Knowledge structures and memory development; n Siegler R. S., (Eds.): Children’s thinking: what develops?; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H. (1985) Changing conception of sources of memory development. Human Development, 28, 50–56.
Clark, H. H. (1969) Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387–404.
Conne, F. (1985) Calculs numériques et calculs relationnels dans la résolution de problèmes arithmétiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 5 (3), 269–332.
Dempster, F. N. (1981) Memory span: sources of individual and developmental differences. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 63–100.
Dumont, B. (1982) L’influence du décor et du langage dans des épreuves de type «logique» portant apparemment sur l’implication, Educational Studies in mathematics, 13, 409–429.
Escarabajal, M. C. (1984) Compréhension et résolution de problèmes additifs. Psychologie Française, 29, (3/4), 247–252.
Fayol, M. (1985) Le récit et sa construction: une approche de psychologie cognitive, Neuchâtel, Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.
Fayol, M. (1985) Nombre, numération et dénombrement: que sait-on de leur acquisiton? Revue Française de Pédagogie, n.o 70, 59–77.
Frederiksen, N. (1984) Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54 (3), 363–487.
Gelman, R. (1983) Les bébés et le calcul. La Recherche, 14 (149), 1382–1389.
Groen, G. J., Parkman, J. M. (1972) A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343.
Hitch, G. J. (1978) The role of short-time working memory in mental arithmetic. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 302–323.
Hitch, G. J. (1980) Developing the concept of working memory; In Claxton G., (Ed.); Cognitive Psychology: new directions; London: Routledge & Keagan.
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S. (1983) Working memory in children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 8, 325–340.
Hudson, T. (1983) Correspondances and numerical differences between disjoint sets. Child Development, 54, 84–90.
Hulme, C., Thomson N., Muir, C., Lawrence, A. (1984) Speech rate and the development of short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 241–253.
Kaye, D. B. (1985). The development of mathematical cognition. Poster presented at the Eighth biennal Meeting of the I.S.S.B.D., Tours, France, July 7.
Kieras, D. E. (1980) Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory & Cognition, 8, 345–353.
Kintsch, W., Greeno, J. G. (1985) Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems, Psychological Review, 92, 109–129.
Kozminsky, E. (1977) Altering comprehension: the effect of biasing titles on text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 5, 482–490.
Nesher, P. (1982) Levels of description in the analysis of addition and subtraction word problems; In Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M., Romberg, T. A. (Eds.); Addition and subtraction: a cognitive perspective; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970) A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.
Richard, J. F. (1984) La construction de la répresentation du probléme, Psychologie Française, 29 (3/4), 226–230.
Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., Keller, J. I. (1983) Development of children’s problem solving ability in arithmetic; In Ginsburg, P. (Ed.); The development of mathematical thinking; New York: Academic Press.
Schwarz, M. N. K., Flammer, A. (1981) Text structure and title effects on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 61–66.
Svenson, D. (1975) Analysis of time required by children for simple additions. Acta Psychologica, 39, 289–302.
Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., Ward, M. R. (1983) Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 639–661.
Teubal, E., Nesher, P. (1983). Order of mention vs order of events as determining factors in additive word problems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference P. M. E. Weizman Institute of Science, Rehovot Israel.
Vergnaud, G. (1982) A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems; In Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M., Romberg, T. A., (Eds.); Addition and subtraction: a cognitive perspective; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Cette recherche a pu être conduite grâce à une subvention de l’Etablissement Public Régional de Bourgogne (Contrat EPR 1982–1984) et à l’aide consécutive à la Recommandation par la Direction de la Recherche du Ministère de l’Education Nationale. Nous remercions C. Bastien et J. Brun pour eurs commentaires à propos d’une première version de cet article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fayol, M., Abdi, H. Impact des formulations sur la résolution de problèmes additifs chez l’enfant de 6 a 10 ans. Eur J Psychol Educ 1, 41–58 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177410
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177410