Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their conceptions of photosynthesis and inheritance

  • Published:
Journal of Elementary Science Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the concepts of photosynthesis and inheritance, to explore their self-efficacy beliefs in the teaching of science, and to investigate the relationship between these two issues. Data was gathered through the use of a misconception instrument and science teaching efficacy beliefs instruments. Seventy-nine preservice elementary teachers participated in this study. The results showed that participants held alternative conceptions regarding photosynthesis and inheritance and have generally positive self-efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching. The results also suggested that those participants with fewer alternative conceptions regarding photosynthesis had relatively high personal science teaching efficacy. Teachers are clearly a central component for student success in learning science; however, in 1983, Feistritzer and Boyer reported that among elementary teachers, understanding science concepts was at a low level. Previous studies have shown that elementary teachers often have negative attitudes toward science (Shrigley, 1974), have science anxiety (Czerniak & Chiarelott, 1990), have low science interest (Tilgner, 1990), and do not have confidence in their ability to teach science (DeTure, Gregory, & Ramsey, 1990). Studies also have found that elementary teachers generally possess a low level of knowledge regarding the concepts, facts, and skills concerning science (Stevens & Wenner, 1996; Victor, 1962; Wenner, 1993). A number of studies have documented that both preservice and inservice elementary teachers frequently hold alternative conceptions (or misconceptions) for a variety of science concepts and harbor misunderstandings (Atwood & Atwood, 1996; Schoon, 1993; Schoon & Boone, 1998). This often causes elementary teachers to avoid teaching science to children (Czerniak & Chiarelott, 1990; Westerback, 1982) or to spend less time teaching science in comparison to other subjects (Westerback, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). In-depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: The case of photosynthesis.The American Biology Teacher, 56, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Sheldon, T., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on collage nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 761–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaudin, M. W., & Mintzes, J. J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the circulatory system: A cross-age study.Science Education, 69, 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 38–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986).Making a difference: Teacher’s sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the causes of seasons.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology.Journal of Biological Education, 18, 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, F. E., & Arditzoglou, S. Y. (1988).Life and physical science misconceptions of preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Austin, TX.

  • Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction: A social cognitive perspective.Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTure, L. R., Gregory, E., & Ramsey, B. G. (1990).The science preparation of elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Atlanta, GA.

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Students’ conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches. In D. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Improving science education (pp 90–116). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, Y., & Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis.American Biology Teacher, 50, 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, L. G., & Gabel, D. (1984). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of volume.School Science and Mathematics, 84, 670–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale.School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feistritzer, E. C., & Boyer, E. L. (1983).The conditions of teaching: A state by state analysis. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1990).A longitudinal study of preservice elementary teachers’ personal and science teaching efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 404 127)

  • Green, K. E. (1996). Applications of the Rasch model to evaluation of survey data quality. In M. T. Bravermann & J. K. Slater (Eds.),Advances in survey research (pp. 81–92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, A., & Scribner-MacLean, M. (1997).Examining elementary teachers’ explanations of their science content knowledge. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 406 161)

  • Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument.Journal of Biological Education, 21, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D., & Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s beliefs about inherited characteristics.Journal of Biological Education, 14, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1996).Bigsteps Rasch-model computer program (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. Chicago: MESA Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, T. M., Heikkinen, H. W., Alcorn, J. K., Ambrosio, A. L., & Gardner, A. L. (1993). Evaluation of the preparation of teachers in science and mathematics: Assessment of preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs.Science Education, 77, 593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflicts and accommodation: Toward principled teaching strategy.Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. G. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument.Science Education, 74, 625–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, K. J. (1993).The origin of earth and space science misconceptions: A survey of preservice elementary teachers. A paper presented at the Third Misconceptions Seminar Proceedings, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

  • Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers.Science Education, 82, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrigley, R. L. (1974). The correlation of science attitude and science knowledge of preservice elementary teachers.Science Education, 58, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1993).Understanding cellular respiration. A paper presented at the International Symposium from Misconceptions to Constructed Understanding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

  • Stepans, J., Dyche, S., & Beiswenger, R. (1988). The effect of two instructional models in bringing about a conceptual change in the understanding of science concepts by prospective elementary teachers.Science Education, 72, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepans, J., & McCormack, A. (1985).A study of scientific conceptions and attitudes toward science of prospective elementary teachers: A research report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 024)

  • Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics.School Science and Mathematics, 96, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school.Science Education, 74, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, J. E., & Mintzes, J. J. (1985). Alternative conceptions in animal classification: A cross-age study.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.25, 304–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, E. (1962). Why are our elementary school teachers reluctant to teach science?Science Education, 46, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H. (1985). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students’ misconceptions?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, G. J. (1993). Relationship between science knowledge levels and beliefs toward science instruction held by preservice elementary teachers..Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, S. L., & Marek, E. A. (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerback, M. (1982). Studies on anxiety about teaching science in preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 937–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson, C. (1995). Children’s biological ideas: Knowledge about ecology, inheritance and evolution. In S. M. Glynn & R. Quit (Eds.),Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 111–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Jale Cakiroglu PhD

  2. School of Education, 3068, Indiana University, 201 N. Rose Avenue, 47405-1006, Bloomington, IN

    William J. Boone PhD

Authors
  1. Jale Cakiroglu PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William J. Boone PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Boone PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cakiroglu, J., Boone, W.J. Preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their conceptions of photosynthesis and inheritance. J Elem Sci Edu 14, 1–14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174733

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174733

Keywords

Search

Navigation