Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of parent goals and their contribution to student achievement goal orientation and engagement in the classroom: Grade-level differences across adolescence

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold: (a) to examine student perceptions of their parent goals and their achievement goal orientations across adolescence, and (b) to examine how perceived parent goals relate to student achievement goal orientations, and engagement in the classroom (both emotional and behavioral) from early to late adolescence. A set of self-report questionnaires measuring the above variables was administered to three age groups of male and female students attending 7th (N=139), 9th (N=149), and 11th grade (N=138). Regarding the first aim of the study, results indicated that 9th and 11th graders scored lower than 7th graders on all student goal orientation scales as well as on the perceived parent performance goal scale. Regarding the second aim, multi-sample path analyses showed that the pattern of relationships among the variables under examination was different for the three grade levels. The significant and non-significant paths among the variables are discussed for each grade level. Implications of the above results for parents as well as for future research are pointed out.

Résumé

Le but de cette étude était double: (a) examiner les perceptions des étudiants des buts de leurs parents et leur orientation de but d’accomplissement à travers l’adolescence, et (b) examiner comment les buts des parents perçus se relient aux orientations des buts d’accomplissement des étudiants, et de leur enclenchement dans la salle de classe (émotif et comportemental) à partir du debut jusc à la fin d’adolescence. Un ensemble de questionnaires d’auto-report mesurant les variables ci-dessus a été administré à trois catégories d’âge d’étudiants masculins et féminins s’occupant de la lère (N=139). 3ème (N=149), et 5ème du Secondaire (N=138). Concernant le premier but de l’étude, les résultats ont indiqué que les étudiants de la 3ème et 5ème ont marqué plus bas que les étudiants de la lère sur toutes les échelles d’orientation de but d’étudiant, comme sur l’échelle de but de performance perçue par les parents. Concernant le deuxième but, les analyses de chemin d’multi-échantillon ont prouvé que le modèle des rapports parmi les variables à l’examen était différent pour les trois niveaux de Secondaire. Les chemins significatifs et non-significatifs parmi les variables sont discutés pour chaque niveau de scolarité. Des implications des résultats ci-dessus pour des parents aussi bien que pour la future recherche sont précisées.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ablard, K.E., & Parker, W.D. (1997). Parents’ achievement goals and perfectionism in their academically talented children.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 651–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, L.H. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging, and social goals as predictors of students’ positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, L.H., & Anderman, E.M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students’ achievement goal orientations.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E.M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E.M., Austin C.C., & Johnson, D.M. (2002). The development of goal orientations. In A.P. Wigfield & J.S. Eccles (Eds.),Development of achievement motivation (pp. 197–221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, J. (1996). Effects of home environment, SES, and maternal test scores on mathematics achievement.Journal of Educational Research, 89, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn, E.H., Dekovic, M., & Meijnen, G.W. (2003). Parenting, goal orientations, classroom behavior, and school success in early adolescence.Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.),Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R.E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.),Research on motivation in education (vol. 3, pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J.S., Lord, S., & Buchanan, C.M. (1996). School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? In J.A. Graber & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.),Transitions through adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 221–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. (1984). Age-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In J.G. Nicholls (Ed.),Advances in motivation and achievement: The development of achievement motivation (vol. 3, pp. 283–331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self-and task-perceptions during elementary school.Child Development, 64, 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation.Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 957–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, M.M., Luckner, A.E., Whaley, G.L., & Egeland, B. (2004). Children’s achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, A.M. (1998). The development of motivation. In A. Demetriou, W. Doise, & C. van Lieshout (Eds.),Life-span developmental psychology (pp. 351–398). Chishester, WS: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedel, J., Hruda, L., & Midgley C. (2001, April).When children limit their one learning: The relation between perceived parent achievement goals and children’s use of avoidance behaviors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle WA.

  • Ganzach, Y. (2000). Parents’ education, cognitive ability, educational expectations and educational attainment: Interactive effects.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheen, M.H., Hruda, L.Z., Middleton, M.J., & Midgley, C. (2000). Using goal orientation theory to examine the transition from middle to high school. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Glasgow, K.L., Dornbush, S.M., Troyer, L., Steinberg, L., & Ritter, P.L. (1997). Parenting styles, adolescents’ attributions, and educational outcomes in nine heterogeneous high schools.Child Development, 68(3), 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, A., Doan Holbein, M.F., & Quilter, S. (2002). High school students’ goal orientations and their relationship to perceived parenting styles.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-DeHass, A.R., Willems, P.P., & Doan Holbein, M.F. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation.Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, L.M. (2006). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transition.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientationin the classroom: Motivational and informational components.Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewitez, J.M., Barron, K.E., Pintrich, P.R., Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N.E., & Craft, S.A. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N.E., Castellino, D.R., Lansford, J.E., Nowlin, P., Dodge, K.A., Bates, J.E., & Petit, G.S. (2004). Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence.Child Development, 75(5), 1491–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies.Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., Middleton, M.J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.),Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21–53) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support.Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M.R., Corpus, J.H., & Iyengar, S.S. (2005). Intinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machr, M.L. (2001). Goal theory is not dead-not yet, anyway: A reflection on the special issue.Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M.J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C. (Ed.). (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Anderman, E.M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teacher and students: A goal theory approach.Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 90–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Middleton, M.J., Gheen, M.H., & Kumar, R. (2002). Stage-environment fit revisited: A goal theory approach to examining school transition. In C. Midgley (Ed.),Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 109–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Gheen, M., Hruda, L., Marachi, R., Middleton, M., Nelson, J. (2000).The transition to high school study: Report to participating schools and districts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M.L., Urdan, T., Hicks, L.H., Anderman, E., & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, M.E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M.J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R.W., & Urdan, T.U. (2000).Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS) Manual: Revised version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, P. (2004). The family context of preadolescents’ orientations toward education: Effects of maternal orientations and behavior.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 714–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, N., Grouzet, F.M.E., & Pelletier, L.G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Cheong, Y.F. (2003). Achievement goal orientations in writing: A developmental perspective.International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E.S., & Belmont, M.J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciproacal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school years.Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement.Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., & MacIver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children’s assessment of intellectual competence.Child Development, 60, 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. (1997). Achievement goal theory: past results, future directions. In P.R. Pinrich & M.L. Maehr (Eds.),Advances in motivation and achievement (vol 10, pp. 99–142), Greenwich, CN: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1987).Student Engagement and Disaffection in School-Student Report. Rochester, New York: Rochester Assessment Package for Schools.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleftheria N. Gonida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonida, E.N., Kiosseoglou, G. & Voulala, K. Perceptions of parent goals and their contribution to student achievement goal orientation and engagement in the classroom: Grade-level differences across adolescence. Eur J Psychol Educ 22, 23–39 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173687

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173687

Key words

Navigation