Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ recognition of children with an illusion of incompetence

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of illusion of incompetence among elementary school children. The first objective is to examine whether teachers are able to recognize children with an illusion of incompetence, The second objective is to see whether teachers’ appraisal of the behaviours and psychological characteristics of these children differ from their appraisals of other children. Seventy-four teachers and their 684 pupils from the fourth and fifth grades who were participating in a larger project were examined. By and large, only 31.3% of the pupils affected by an illusion of incompetence were identified as such by their teachers. However, teachers evaluated boys with an illusion of incompetence as being less autonomous, having a more negative mood and being more withdrawn than their peers. The teachers did not report these characteristics in girls with an illusion of incompetence. The discussion focuses on various hypotheses likely involved in teachers’ difficulty in identifying children whose self-appraisals of competence are negative.

Résumé

Cette étude s’intéresse au phénomène de l’illusion d’incompétence chez l’élève du primaire. Le premier objectif est d’examiner la sensibilité des enseignants à la présence du phénomène chez certains de leurs élèves en vérifiant dans quelle mesure ils sont capables de les identifier. Le second objectif est d’examiner comment ils évaluent diverses caractéristiques de ces mêmes élèves. Soixante-quatorze enseignants de 684 élèves de quatrième et cinquième année du primaire participant à un projet plus vaste portant sur les biais dans l’évaluation de leurs compétences ont été examinés. Dans l’ensemble, les enseignants identifient 31.3% des élèves affectés par l’illusion d’incompétence. Cependant, ils évaluent les garçons présentant ce problème comme étant plus retirés, d’humeur plus négative, et moins autonomes en classe que les autres garçons; aucune de ces différences n’est rapportée chez les filles. La discussion propose diverses hypothèses en regard de cette difficulté des enseignants à reconnaître ceux de leurs élèves ayant un important problème d’évaluation de leurs capacités.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T.M. (1991).L’inventaire du comportement du jeune (traduction française du Child Behavior Checklist, CBCL/4-18). Burlington, University of Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., & Connell, J.P. (1992). The validity of students’ self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. In D.H. Schunk & J.L. Meece (Eds.),Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 25–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social fondations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, T., & Bordeleau, L. (2002). Le rôle des agents sociaux dans l’ontogénèse des ressources motivationnelles du jeune élève. In L. Lafortune & P. Mongeau (Eds.),L’affectivité dans l’apprentissage (pp. 183–207). Presses de l’Université du Québec.

  • Bouffard, T., & Couture, M. (2003). Motivational profile and academic achievement among students enrolled in different schooling tracks.Educational Studies, 29, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, T., Boileau, L., & Vezeau, C. (2001). Students’ transition from elementary to high school and changes of the relationship between motivation and academic performance.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, T., Boisvert, M., & Vezeau, C. (2003). The illusion of incompetence and its correlates among elementary school children and their parents.Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, T., Marcoux, M.F., Vezeau, C., & Bordeleau, L. (2003). Changes in self-perceptions of competence and intrinsic motivation among elementary school children.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., Chouinard, R., & Marcotte, G. (submitted). L’illusion d’incompétence et les facteurs associés chez l’élève du primaire.Revue Française de Pédagogie.

  • Bouffard, T., Markovits, H., Vezeau, C., Boisvert, M., & Dumas, C. (1998). The relation between accuracy of self-perception and cognitive development.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2001). Jugement scolaire et internalité des élèves. In G. Figari & M. Achouche (Eds.),L’activité évaluative réinterrogée: Regards scolaires et socioprofessionnels (pp. 196–205). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2003).Quand les enseignants jugent leurs élèves. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.P., & Ilardi, B.C. (1987). Self-system concommitants of discrepancies between children’s and teachers’ evaluations of academic competence.Child Development, 58, 1297–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupeyrat, C. (2000).Conceptions de l’intelligence, orientations de buts et apprentissage autorégulé chez des adultes en reprise d’études. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Université Toulouse II.

  • Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer, G.H. (1989). Developmental analysis of control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.),Self-efficacity in changing societies (pp. 69–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbert, D.J. (1990).Evaluation psychométrique du concept de soi chez l’enfant d’âge scolaire. Unpublished master dissertation. Université du Québec à Montréal.

  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children.Child Development, 53, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In R. Leahy (Ed.),The development of the self (pp. 55–122). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1990). Causes correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: Processes and patterns of change. In A.K. Boggiano & T.S. Pittman (Eds.),Achievement and Motivation: A social Developmental Perspective (pp. 77–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The pictorial scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children.Child Development, 55, 1969–1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. (1979). The illusion of incompetence. In L.C. Perlmutter & R.A. Monty (Eds.).Choice and perceived control (pp. 301–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D.W., Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve.Child Development, 73, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Myhill, D. (2004). “Troublesome boys” and “compliant girls”: Gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(5), 547–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. (1979). Development of perception of own attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, A.S., & Lennon, R.T. (1971).Epreuve d’habilité mentale Otis-Lennon. Niveau Élémentaire II. Forme J. Ottawa: Institut de Recherches psychologiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansu, P., Bressoux, P., Leonesio, A.M., & Mezière, C. (2000). Pour une analyse de la construction du jugement scolaire.Psychologie et Education, 42, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.A. (1984). The illusion of incompetence among academically competent children.Child Development, 55, 2000–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.A. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children.Child Development, 58, 1308–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.A., & Zimmerman, M. (1990). The Developmental Course of Perceived Competence and Incompetence among Competent Children. In R.J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian Jr. (Eds.),Competence Considered (pp. 41–66). Rew Haven, CT: Yale university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, P.A. (1999).Les indicateurs de l’effort scolaire selon les enseignants et enseignantes de niveau secondaire. Unpublished master dissertation. Université du Québec à Montréal.

  • Ruble, D.N., Grosovsky, E.H., Frey, K.S., & Cohen, R. (1992). Developmental changes in competence assessment. In A.K. Boggiano (Ed.),Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 138–164). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., & Dunnell, P. A. (1994). A comparison of epistemological beliefs between gifted and non-gifted high school students.Roeper Review, 16, 297–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J.H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., & MacIver, D. (1989). Development change in children’s assessment of intellectual competence.Child Development, 60, 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., & Pintrich, P.R. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148–185). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Hélène Fleury-Roy.

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Government of Canada) and the Fonds FQRSC (Government of Quebec).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleury-Roy, MH., Bouffard, T. Teachers’ recognition of children with an illusion of incompetence. Eur J Psychol Educ 21, 149–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173574

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173574

Key words

Navigation