Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Everyday common sense and school mathematics

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, proposals have been made to build mathematics teaching more closely on children's informal knowledge, i.e. on concepts and strategies formed in natural, everday settings. The article focuses on questions concerning this trend, more specifically on issues concerning how and in what sense children benefit from everyday common sense knowledge when they learn mathematics at school. Three empirical examples, collected within a field-based research project at the intermediate children, when using their everyday life experience, sometimes fail to make mathematical sense of a given task. Two factors which complicate the creation of links between common sense and mathematics are discussed: one that deals with the problem of using everyday life experience as a basis for abstracting mathematical ideas, and one which concerns the pupil's abilities to interpret an assigned task in a mathematically relevant way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baroody, A., & Ginsburg, H. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic. In J. Hiebert (Ed.),Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 75–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1985). Toward a solution of the learning paradox.Review of Educational Research, 55, 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T., Moser, J., & Romberg, T. (Eds.) (1982).Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockroft Committee of Inquiry Into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. (1982).Mathematics counts. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science.Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, O. (1982).Elevernas tolkning av skoluppgiften (Pupils' interpretations of a learning task). Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet. Diss.

  • Halldén, O. (1988). Alternative frameworks and the conception of task. Cognitive constraints in pupils' interpretations of teachers' assignments.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (1984). Children's mathematical learning: The struggle to link form and understanding.The Elementary School Journal, 84, 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1986).Children and number. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.).Everyday Cognition. Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A., & Liljefors, R. (1983).Matematik i svensk skola (Mathematics in the Swedish school). Stockholm: Skolöverstyrelsen och Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991).Bibliography. Students' alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. & Lave, J. (Eds.) (1984).Everyday cognition. Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. (1988). Candy selling and math learning.Educational Researcher, xx, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1986) On having and using geometric knowledge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.),Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 225–265). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1984). Prompts, cues, and discrimination: The utilization of two separate knowledge systems.European Journal of Science Education, 6, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wistedt, J. (1987).Rum for lärande (Latitude for Learning). Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet. Diss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wistedt, I. (1990).Vardagskunskaper och skolmatematik (Everyday life experience and school mathematics). Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Inger Wistedt

Authors
  1. Inger Wistedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The study presented here was financed by the Swedish National Board of Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wistedt, I. Everyday common sense and school mathematics. Eur J Psychol Educ 9, 139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173549

Download citation

  • Received:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173549

Key words

Search

Navigation