Values and work environment: Mapping 32 occupations

Abstract

The study addresses the relationship between values and occupations. Israeli workers (N=652; mean age=47; 43% male) in 32 occupations reported their values using the Portrait Value Questionnaire (Schwartz, Melech, Lehmann, Burgess, Harris, & Owens, 2001), and value scores were aggregated within occupations. Occupations were classified according to the Holland (1985) typology. Enterprising work environments correlated negatively with universalism values. Social environments correlated positively with benevolence and universalism values and negatively with power and achievement. The artistic environment correlated negatively with conformity values. Investigative environments correlated positively with self-direction values and negatively with tradition. A COPLOT analysis of occupational value priorities yielded meaningful clusters of occupations, each characterized by a distinct value profile, and fitting the Holland typology. The findings point to the importance of values in vocational behavior.

Résumé

Cette recherche s'intŕresse à la relation entre les valeurs et les professions. Des professionnels israéliens (N=652; âge moyen: 47; hommes: 43%) exerçant 32 professions distinctes, ont reporté leurs valeurs au moyen du Portrait Value Questionnaire (Schwartz et al., 2001): les scores de valeurs ont été regroupés selon les professions, et les professions classées selon la typologie de Holland. Les résultats montrent que les environnements de travail de type entrepreneurial sont corrélés négativement avec les valeurs d'universalisme. Les professions du type social sont corrélés positivement avec les valeurs de bienveillance et d'universalisme et négativement avec le pouvoir et l'accomplissement social. L'environnement artistique est négativement corrélé avec les valeurs de conformité. L'environnement de type investigatif est positivement corrélé avec l'autonomie et négativement avec la tradition. Une analyse COPLOT montre des clusters de professions caractérisés chacun par un profil de valeur, et ceci conformément à la typologie de Holland. Les résultats indiquent l'importance des valeurs dans l'orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aguirre, A. (1990). Poverty in the United States: Race, ethnic and gender differences. In S. Chan & J. Currie (Eds.),Income and status differences between White and minority Americans: A persistent inequality (pp. 101–121). Lampeter, Dyfed, Wales: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alwin, D.F. (1990). Cohort replacement and changes in parental socialization values.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aunola K., Vanhatalo, O., & Sethi, R. (2001). Social background, values, and parenting.Psykologia, 36, 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borg, I., & Shye, S. (1993).Facet theory: The method and its applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, D. (2002). The role of work and cultural values in occupational choice, satisfaction, and success: A theoretical statement.Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chatman, J.A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit.Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatman, J.A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms.Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1993). From TWA to PEC.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Denton, D.W. (1999). The attraction-selection-attrition model of organizational behavior and the homogeneity of managerial personality.Current Research in Social Psychology, 4, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eagly, A.H., & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Furnham, A. (1988). Values and vocational choice: A study of value differences in medical, nursing and psychology students.Social Science and Medicine, 26, 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gatton, D.S., DuBois, C.L.Z., & Faley, R.H. (1999). The effects of organizational context on occupational genderstereotyping.Sex Roles, 40, 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldreich, Y., & Raveh, A. (1993).COPLOT display technique as an aid to climatic classification.Geographical Analysis, 25, 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gottfredson, G.D., Holland, J.L., & Ogawa, D.K. (1982).Dictionary of Holland occupational codes. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guimond, S. (1995). Encounter and metamorphosis: The impact of military socialisation on professional values.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points.Psychometrica, 33, 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holland, J.L. (1985).Making vocational choice: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holland, J.L. (1997).Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed). Boston: Psychological Assessment Resources INC.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holland, J.L., & Gottfredson, G.D. (1976). Using a typology of persons and environments to explain careers,Counseling Psychologist, 6, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knafo, A. (2003). Contexts, relationship quality, and family value socialization: The case of parent-school ideological fit in Israel.Personal Relationships, 10, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2001). Value socialization in families of Israeli-born and Soviet-born adolescents in Israel.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2003a). Culture-appropriate parenting and value transmission in families of Israeli-born and Soviet-born adolescents in Israel. In T. Horowitz, S. Hoffman, & B. Kotik-Friedgut (Eds.),From pacesetters to dropouts: Post-Soviet youth in comparative perspective (pp. 69–88). New York: The Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2003b). Parenting and accuracy of perception of parental values by adolescents.Child Development, 73, 595–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, SH. (2004a). Identity status and parent-child value congruence in adolescence.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2004b).Value transmission in the family: Effects of family background and implications for educational achievement. Jerusalem: NCJW Research Institute for Innovation in Education (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kohn, M.L., & Schooler, C. (1983).Work and personality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maccoby, E.E. (1998).The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pryor, R.G.L., & Taylor N.B. (1986). On combining scores from interest and value measures for counseling.The Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 34, 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reardon, R., Vernick, S., & Reed, C. (2001).A Holland perspective on the U.S. workforce from 1960 to 1990 (Tech. Rep. No. 33). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reskin, B.F., & Hartmann, H.I. (Eds.). (1986).Women's work, men's work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rokeach, M. (1973).The nature of human values. New-York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rounds, J.B. (1990). The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sagiv, L. (2002). Vocational interests and basic values.Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S.H. (2000). Values priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects.European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place.Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H.W., & Smith, D.B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update.Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz, S.H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwartz, S.H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz, S.H., Lehmann, A., & Roccas, S. (1999). Multimethod probes of basic human values. In J. Adamopoulos & Y. Kashima (Eds.),Social psychology and culture context: Essays in honor of Harry C. Triandis (pp. 107–123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shye, S., & Elizur, D. (1994).Introduction to facet theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tracey, T.L., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's Vocational-Interest models: A structural meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Trusty, J., Ng, K.-M., & Ray, D. (2000). Choice of Holland's Social type college majors for U.S. racial/ethnic groups.Journal of Career Development, 27, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Walsh, W.B., & Holland, J.L. (1992). A theory of personality types and work environments. In W.B. Walsh, K.H. Craik, & R.H. Price (Eds.),Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 35–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work of the first author was supported by a Kreitman Foundation fellowship, while he was at Ben Gurion University. This project was supported by a grant from the Recanati Fund of the School of Business Administration at the Hebrew University to the second author. Data collection was supported by grants from The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 921/02-1) and from the NCJW Center for Development in Education to Shalom Schwartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knafo, A., Sagiv, L. Values and work environment: Mapping 32 occupations. Eur J Psychol Educ 19, 255–273 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173223

Download citation

Key words

  • Career Development
  • Occupational choice
  • Values
  • Work environment