Skip to main content
Log in

Personality traits and abilities as predictors of academic achievement

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the respective effects of cognitive abilities and personality traits on academic achievement. The subjects were 141 sixth-grade French adolescents (mean age: 12) who took three cognitive tests (g factor, numerical ability, and spatial ability) and answered a personality questionnaire based on the Big Five Model. Path analyses indicated that Openness-intellect had an effect on junior high school achievement in all disciplines, with most effects being indirect ones mediated by verbal achievement (French). Neuroticism-anxiety also had an effect, although not as marked and mainly on mathematics. Personality is complementary to abilities in predicting academic achievement. Possible conceptual extensions and field applications are addressed in the conclusion.

Résumé

Le but de cette recherche est de mettre en évidence l’influence respective des aptitudes et des traits de personnalité sur les performances scolaires. 141 participants, élèves de sixième (âge moyen 12 ans), ont répondu à trois tests cognitifs (facteur g, aptitude numérique, aptitude spatiale) et à un questionnaire de personnalité basé sur le modèle des Big Five. Les analyses de parcours indiquent que l’Ouverture-intellect a une influence sur l’ensemble des performances au collège, la plupart des effets étant indirects, via le niveau en français. Le Névrosisme-anxiété a aussi un effet, plus modeste et principalement sur les mathématiques. La prédiction approtée par la personnalité complète celle qui est donnée par les épreuves d’aptitudes. Les perspectives de prolongement conceptuel et d’application au terrain sont abordées en conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P.L., & Heggestad, E.D. (1997). Intelligence, Personality, and Interests: Evidence for Overlapping Traits.Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blicke, G. (1996). Personality traits, learning strategies, and performance.European Journal of Personality, 10, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning.European Journal of Personality, 10, 377–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C.R. (1994). Open to experience-closed to intelligence: Why the “Big Five” are really the “Comprehensive Six”.European Journal of Personality, 8, 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J., & Stough, C. (1995). Theoretical and Empirical Relationships between Personality and Intelligence. In D.H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.),International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence (pp. 321–348), New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relation between learning style, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education.Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1959).Culture Fair Test. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1959).Culture Fair Test. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1971).Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. London: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W., & Tatsuoka, M.M. (1970).Handbook for the sixteen factor questionnaire. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communian, A.L. (1993). Anxiety, cognitive interference, and school performance of Italian children.Psychological Reports, 73, 747–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L.A., & Regan, D.T. (1982). Attention, perception, and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),The Handbook of Human Intelligence (pp. 123–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic.Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1996). Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement.European Journal of Personality, 10, 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B. (1996). Personality traits in learning and education.European Journal of Personality, 10, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H.C. (1996a). Editorial: personality, learning and education.European Journal of Personality, 10, 303–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H.C. (1996b). Personality in learning and education: A review.European Journal of Personality 10, 301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N.S., & Parker, J.D. (1992). Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area.European Journal of Personality, 6, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1992). Four ways five factors arenot basic.Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1994). Personality and intelligence: Psychometric and experimental approaches. In R.J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.),Personality and Intelligence (pp. 3–31). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1996). Personality and the experimental study of education.European Journal of Personality, 10, 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M.W. (1992).Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M.W. (1997).Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D.J. (1996). Personality, coping, and objective outcomes: Extraversion, neuroticism, coping styles, and academic performance.Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P.-Y., & Bailleux, C. (1999). Identification de variables orectiques parmi les traits de personnalité. In M. Huteau & J. Lautrey (Eds.),Approches différentielles en psychologie (pp. 301–308). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, P.-Y., & Bailleux, C., Flamand, I., & Dalle, N. (2000). Facteurs cognitifs et conatifs de l’adaptation à l’entrée en 6ème.Psychologie Française, 45, 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, M., & Ackerman, P.L. (1992). Personality-Intelligence Relations: Assessment of Typical Intellectual Engagement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1994). Resolving a scientific embarrassment: A comment on the articles of this special issue.European Journal of Personality, 8, 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995).Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Ones, D.S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.),Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849–870). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P., Caspi, A., Robins, R.W., Moffitt, T.E., & Stouhamer-Loeber, M. (1994). Exploring the nomological network of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Adolescent Boys.Child Development, 65, 160–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnstamm, G.A., Mervielde, I., Besevegis, E., & Halverson, J.R. (1995). Tracing the Big Five in parents’ free descriptions of their children.European Journal of Personality, 9, 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, S.E., & Johnson, E.F. (1986). A large-scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16 PF.Psychological Reports, 59, 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, and S. Briggs (Eds.),Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826–847). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., & Tindell, G. (1993). Anxiety and Academic Achievement: Further Furneaux Factor Findings.Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 609–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., Taghavi-Khonsary, M., & Tindell, G. (2000). Neuroticism and academic achievement: The Furneaux Factor as a measure of academic rigour.Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzionne, J.-M. (1977).Batterie Factorielle d’Aptitudes. Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D.R., & Salovey, P. (2000). Emotional Intelligence meets Traditional Standards for an Intelligence.Intelligence, 27, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normandeau, S., & Guay, F. (1998). Preschool behavior and first-grade school achievement: The mediational role of cognitive self-control.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, F., & Angleitener, A. (1994). Reflections on different labels for Factor V.European Journal of Personality, 8, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuchlin, M. (1991).Les différences individuelles à l’école. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocklin, T. (1994). Relation between typical intellectual engagement and openness: Comment on Goff and Ackerman (1992).Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, J.P. (1993). Validité de construct de “marqueurs” des dimensions de personnalité du modèle en cinq facteurs.Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 43, 317–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, M.G., Paunonen, S.V., Rush, J.C., & King, G.A. (1994). Personality and Cognitive Ability Predictors of Performance in Graduate Business School.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 516–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouxel, G. (1999). Path analyses of the relations between self-efficacy, anxiety and academic performance.European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski, C.J., & Cogburn, H.E. (1997). Need for Cognition in the Big-Five Factor Structure.The Journal of Psychology, 131, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence.Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, R.H.J., van Aken, M.A.G., & van Liesthout, C.F.M. (1997). Adolescent Personality Factors in Self-Ratings and Peer Nominations and Their Prediction of Peer Acceptance and Peer Rejection.Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 534–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. (1987). Aptitude complexes. In R.E. Snow & M.J. Farr (Eds.),Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Volume 3: Conative and Affective Processes Analyses, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1996).Manuel du WISC-III, Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (1995). Personality Trait Correlates of Intelligence. In D.H. Zeidner & M. Zeidner (Eds.),International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence (pp. 299–320). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Yves Gilles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilles, PY., Bailleux, C. Personality traits and abilities as predictors of academic achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ 16, 3–15 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172991

Key words

Navigation