Skip to main content
Log in

Social processes and creative collaboration in children

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there is an extensive body of literature that investigates the process and outcomes of children’s collaboration on scientific reasoning tasks, very little work has focussed on the nature and quality of children’s collaboration on creative tasks. One study reported here used a questionnaire to music teachers to ask about their typical design of musical tasks in the classroom and the factors that influenced these decisions. A further study reported here investigated the effects of friendship, gender and previous musical experience upon the interactional processes and musical outcome of children’s collaborative compositions. The design included comparison between friendship pairs and non-friendship pairs and also between males and females, with 11–12 year old children at an English middle school. All pairs consisted of one child with previous musical experience and one child without. All compositional sessions were video taped and the musical and verbal elements were coded with reference to the proportion of transactive and non-transactive elements present. Results demonstrated that the communication (both verbal and musical) between the friendship pairs was qualitatively different from the communication in the non-friendship pairs. Specifically, the friendship pairs showed more transactive communication and, when a teacher rated the final compositions, the friendship pairs scored significantly higher. Multiple regression analysis highlighted that the amount of transactive communication was a significant predicator of the quality of the children’s composition. The results are discussed with reference to the nature of communication, the impact of friendship and the assessment of creative work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, D. (1996).Music Therapy Research and Practice in medicine: From out of the Silence. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning.Social Development, 2, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, S., & Light, P. (1992). Interaction, gender and performance on a computer based problem solving task.Learning and Instruction, 2, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barret, M. (1998). Researching children’s compositional process and products: connection to music education practice. In B. Sundrin, G.E. MacPherson, & G. Folkestad (Eds.),Children Composing, (pp. 10–35). Malmo: Malmo Academy of Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, D. (1992).The Rationality of Feeling. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M.W., Gibbs, J.C., & Broughton, J. (1980). The relation of moral judgement disparity to developmental effects of peer dialogue.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.J., Galton, M.J., & Robinson, S. (1996). Teachers’ assessments of primary children’s classwork in the creative arts.Educational Research, 38, 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W.W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance.Child Development, 67, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C.J., & Tolmie, A. (1999). Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.),Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 24–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Rogers, C. (1992). The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P.G., Crook, C.K., & Stevenson, R.J. (1995). Childs play: Creative writing in playful environments. In H.C. Foot, C.J. Howe, A. Anderson, A.K. Tolmie, & D.A. Warden (Eds.),Group and Interactive Learning. Boston: Computational Mechanics Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratus, J.K. (1989). A time analysis of the compositional processes used by children aged 7 to 11.Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, A.-C. (1992). The effect of peer- and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R.A.R., O’Donnell, P.J., & Davies, J.B. (1999). Structured music workshops for individuals with learning difficulty: An empirical investigation.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1999). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom.Learning and Instruction, 6, 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miell, D., & Faulkner, D. (1994, July). Children’s working relationships. Paper presented at the Biennial International Conference on Personal Relationships, Groningen, Netherlands.

  • Miell, D., & MacDonald, R.A.R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition.Social Development, 9, 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. (1999).Children’s Collaborative Music Composition: Communication through Music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A.F., & Brady, J.E. (1982). Mutuality in boys’ friendship relations.Child Development, 53, 392–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1999). Mental and physical artefacts in cognitive processes. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.),Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S.D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.),Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The main study reported in this paper was funded by a grant from the Open University Social Science Faculty research committee, and by a grant from Leicester University to the third author for Ph.D. Research. The doctoral work reported was conducted under the supervision of Prof. D.J. Hargreaves of University of Surrey, Roehampton and Dr. R. Joiner of the Open University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonald, R., Miell, D. & Morgan, L. Social processes and creative collaboration in children. Eur J Psychol Educ 15, 405–415 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172984

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172984

Key words

Navigation