Skip to main content
Log in

Infant attention scaffolding at home

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify the mechanisms underlying the links between maternal attention directing strategies and infants’ focused attention. In the first year of life temporal organisation of dyadic behaviour was examined in the home. A sample of 50 dyads was videorecorded for one hour during usual activities, twice at 5- and 8-months of age. Onset and offset of maternal behaviours toward objects, and infants’ attention were noted. Sequential analyses demonstrated dependencies between partner’s behaviours: infants and mothers adjusted to each other’s activity. Maternal behaviours were classified as introducing, maintaining and redirecting attention: over both ages, the most frequent maternal behaviour was introducing, which did not systematically attract the infant’s attention; maintaining was the second most frequent maternal behaviour. Infants focused their attention longer when the mother used introducing or maintaining strategies. Older infants initiated a greater proportion of attention focusing episodes. At both ages inter-dyads variability is very large, with a significant inter-ages stability. The present data bring further support to the interpretation of parental activity as a genuine scaffolding of attention.

Résumé

Cette étude se propose de mettre en évidence les mécanisme sousacents aux corrélations observées entre la fréquence des focalisations de l’attention du bébé et la fréquence des interventions maternelles à ce sujet. Pour cela, on considère l’organisation temporelle de ces comportements. Cinquante dyades mère-bébé ont été filmées à la maison pendant une heure d’activités, habituelles, quand le bébé avait 5 puis 8 mois. Les débuts et fins des focalisations de l’attention du bébé sur des objets et des interventions maternelles ont été détectées. Une analyse séquentielle a mis en évidence des dépendances significatives dans la succession des comportements des deux partenaires. Les interventions maternelles peuvent viser à attirer l’attention, à la maintenir ou à la rediriger; la première catégorie est la plus fréquente, mais les soutiens sont loin d’être rares. Les mères ne réussissent pas toujours à attirer l’attention, mais quand elles interviennent, pour attirer ou maintenir l’attention, les focalisations du bébé durent plus longtemps. Les bébés de 8 mois sont à l’initiative de plus de focalisations. Aux deux âges la variabilité inter-dyades est très grande, et la stabilité inter-âges est significative. Tous ces résultats soutiennent l’interprétation des interventions maternelles en termes d’étayage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belsky, J., Goode, M.K., & Most, R.K. (1980). Maternal stimulation and infant exploratory competence: Cross-sectional, correlational and experimental analyses.Child Development, 51, 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., & Benasich, A. (1986). Infant habituation: Assessment of individual differences and short-term reliability at 5 months.Child Development, 57, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., & Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. (1990). Activities and interactions of mothers and their firstborn infants in the first six months of life: Covariation, stability, continuity, correspondence, and prediction.Child Development, 61, 1206–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Pêcheux, M.-G., & Rahn, C. (1991). Mother and infant activity and interaction in France and in the USA: A comparative study.International Journal of Behavioural Development, 14, 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M.H., Toda, S., Azuma, H., Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Ogino, M. (1990). Mother and infant activity and interaction in Japan and in the United States. II: A comparative microanalysis of naturalistic exchanges focused on the organisation of infant attention.International Journal of Behavioural Development, 13, 289–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S. (1982). The organisation of action and the nature of the adult-infant transaction. In E.Z. Tronick (Ed.),Social interchange in infancy: Affect, cognition, and communication, Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B.A., Hayne, H., & Richardson, R. (Eds.) (1992).Attention and information processing in infants and adults. Perspectives from human and animal research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and psychological measurement, 20, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, J., Mitchell, D.W., & Horowitz, F.D. (1988). Infant visual attention in the paired-comparison paradigm: Test-retest and attention-performance relations.Child Development, 59, 1198–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danis, A., & Saules, R. (1994). The effect of situation familiarity on the establishment of co-references between mother and infant.Early Development and Parenting, 3, 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M.K. (1988). Arousal, affect, and attention as component of temperament.Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 55, 958–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J.T. (Ed.) (1990).The development of attention: Research and theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findji, F., Pêcheux, M.-G., & Ruel, J. (1992). Don’t stimulate, just be responsive. Poster presented at the VIIIth. International Conference on Infant Studies, Miami, April 1992.

  • Findji, F., Pêcheux M.-G., & Ruel, J. (1993). Dyadic activities and attention in the infant: A longitudinal study.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M., & Roy, A.K. (1990).Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioural researchers Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haccou, P., & Meelis E. (1992).Statistical analyses of behavioural data: An approach based on time-structured models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, K.R., Parinello, R., & Ruff, H.A. (1992). Maternal behaviour and infant attention.Infant Behaviour and Development, 15, 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S.H., & Chapieski, M.L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: Effects of Down syndrome and prematurity.Child Development, 60, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S.H., Garner, P.W., Swank, P.R., & Baldwin, C.D. (1996). Effects of maternal scaffolding during joint toy play with preterm and full-term infants.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockman, J.J., & McHale, J.P. (1989). Object manipulation in infancy: Developmental and contextual determinants. In J.J. Lockman & N.L. Hazen (Eds.),Action in a social context: Perspectives on early development (pp. 129–167). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R.B. (1971). Attention in the infant: Avenue to the study of cognitive development. In D. Walcher & D.L. Peters (Eds.),Early childhood: The development of self regulatory mechanisms (pp. 107–137). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parinello, R.M., & Ruff, H.A. (1988). The influence of adult intervention on infants’ level of attention.Child Development, 59, 1125–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pêcheux, M.-G., Findji, F., & Ruel, J. (1992). Maternal scaffolding of attention between 5 and 8 months.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pêcheux, M.-G., Ruel, J., & Bornstein, M.H. (1992). Mères et bébés pendant la première année: Une étude longitudinate de deux types d’interaction.Année Psychologique, 92, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, H.A. (1986). Components of attention during infant’s manipulative exploration.Child Development, 57, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, H.A., & Lawson, K.R. (1990). Development of sustained, focused attention in young children during free play.Developmental Psychology, 26, 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifer, R., Clark, G.N., & Sameroff, A.J. (1991). Positive effects of interaction coaching on infants with developmental disabilities and their mothers.American Journal of mental Retardation, 96, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1980). The foundations of intersubjectivity: development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. In D. Olson (Ed.),The social foundation of language and thought: Essays in honor of J.S. Bruner (pp. 316–342). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beek, Y., de Roos, B., Hoeksma, J.B., & Hopkins, B. (1992). Sequential analysis of nominal data in mother-infant communication: Quantifying dominance and bidirectionality.Behaviour, 122, 306–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Findji, F. Infant attention scaffolding at home. Eur J Psychol Educ 13, 323–333 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172948

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172948

Key words

Navigation