Skip to main content
Log in

Verbal discussions about social problem-solving between friends and non-friends

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of developmental social psychology there is a consensus concerning the social nature of intelligence. In spite of the important empirical investigations in this field over the last fifteen years, the influence of the quality of a relationship on joint problem-solving and learning is still poorly understood. This explorary study investigated the influence of socio-affective context on the interactive modalities surrounding social problem-solving discussions conducted with 32 dyads of 8-year-old Swiss francophone children. Sociometric interviews with children and teachers were carried out to identify the following naturally-ocurring socio-affective contexts: reciprocal friendship (RF), asymmetrical friendship (AF) and reciprocal absence of friendship (“reciprocal non-friendship” RNF; excluding enemies). Comparisons of verbal exchanges and dyadic performance across the three groups suggests that reciprocal friendship facilitates collaboration and the organization of collective work. Two rival hypotheses opposing socio-affective proximity (reciprocal friendship) and socio-affective distance (asymmetrical friendship and reciprocal absence of friendship) are discussed with respect to the influence of social interactions on social problem-solving.

Résumé

Dans le champ de la psychologie sociale génétique, il existe un consensus sur la nature sociale de l’intelligence. En dépit des nombreux travaux de recherche effectués au cours des quinze dernières années, l’influence de la qualité d’une relation sur la résolution conjointe de problèmes et sur l’apprentissage reste encore méconnue. Cette étude exploratoire a examiné l’influence du contexte socio-affectif sur les modalités interactives autour d’une discussion impliquant un problème social entre enfants âgés de huit ans (N=32 dyades) en provenance de la suisse francophone. Des entrevues sociométriques avec des enfants et des enseignants ont été effectuées afin d’identifier les contextes socio-affectifs suivants: amitié réciproque, amitié asymétrique et absence d’amitié (excluant les ennemis). Si on compare les échanges verbaux et les performances dyadiques entre les trois groupes, les résultats suggèrent que l’amitié réciproque facilite la collaboration et l’organisation collective du travail. Deux hypothèses rivales opposant la proximité socio-affective (amitié réciproque) et la distance socio-affective (amitié asymétrique et absence d’amitié) ont été discutées en fonction de l’influence des interactions sociales sur la résolution d’un problème social.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahami, A.T., Selman, R.L., & Stone, C. (1981). A developmental assessment of children’s verbal strategies for social action resolution.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, G.J., & Murray, F.B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict.Developmental Psychology, 18, 894–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S.R. (1985). An evolving paradigm in social skill training research with children. In B.H. Schneider, K.H. Rubin, & J.E. Ledingham (Eds.),Children’s Peer Relations Issues in Assessment and Intervention (pp. 157–171). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning.Social Development, 2, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). Social influences on children’s cognition: State of the art and future directions. In H.W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 89–144). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N., Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1985). Sociocognitive conflict and intellectual growth.New Directions for Child Development, 29, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M.W. (1985). The role of discussion in moral education. In M.W. Berkowitz & F. Oser (Eds.),Moral Education: Theory and Application (pp. 197–218). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M.W., Oser, F., & Althof, W. (1987). The development of sociomoral discourse. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.),Moral Development Through Social Interaction (pp. 322–353). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T.J. (1986). Sharing between friends: Contexts and consequences. In E.C. Mueller & C.R. Cooper (Eds.),Process and Outcome in Peer Relationships (pp. 105–127). New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T.J. (1987). The distinctive features of conversations between friends: Theories, research, and implications for sociomoral development. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.),Moral Development Through Social Interaction (pp. 281–300). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T.J., McCartney, K., Caparulo, B.K., & Moore, A.M. (1982–1984). The effects of group discussions on children’s moral decisions.Social Cognition, 2, 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, B.J. (1977). Children’s friendship expectations: A cognitive-developmental study.Child Development, 48, 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, B.J., & La Gaipa, J.J. (1975). Children’s written descriptions of friendship: A multidimensional analysis.Developmental Psychology, 11, 857–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, W.R., & LaFrenière, P. (1983). Dominance, friendship, and resource utilization in preschool children’s groups.Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalzon, C. (1988). Conflit cognitif et construction de la notion de droite/gauche. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont & M. Nicolet (Eds.),Interagir et connaître: Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif (pp. 55–71). Fribourg-Suisse, Editions Delval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Killen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children’s moral reasoning.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations.European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, M. (1990).Similarité dyadique dans l’amitié vécue à l’école. Thèse de doctorat en psychologie. Document non publié. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, M., & Moss, E. (1992). Influence de l’affectivité sur l’activité cognitive des enfants.Enfance, 46, 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem solving and children’s planning skills.Developmental Psychology, 25, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, M., Fraise, J., & Roux, J.-P. (1988). Résolution de problèmes en dyades et progrès cognitifs chez des enfants de 11 à 13 ans: dynamiques interactives et mécanismes socio-cognitifs. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont & M. Nicolet (Eds.),Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif (pp. 73–92). Fribourg-Suisse: Editions Delval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M. (1983). How children become friends.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48 (3, No 201).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. (1988).La construction sociale de l’intersubjectivité entre adulte et enfant en situation de test. Fribourg-Suisse: Editions Delval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. (1989). Le contrat implicite entre l’expérimentateur et l’enfant en situation de test.Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 48, 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W.W. (1975). The origins of friendships. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.),Friendship and Peer Relations (pp. 11–26). New York. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In P.H. Mussen & E.M. Hetherington (Eds.),Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization Personality and Social Development (4th ed.) (vol IV, pp. 103–197).

  • Hartup, W.W. (1985). Relationships and their significance in cognitive development. In R.A. Hinde, A.N. Perret-Clermont, & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Social Relationships and Cognitive Development (pp. 56–82). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W.W. (1987). Relationships and their significance in cognitive development. In R. Hinde, A. Perret-Clermont, & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Social Relationships and Cognitive Development (pp. 66–83). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1976). Towards understanding relationships: Dynamic stability. In P.P.G. Bateson & R.A. Hinde (Eds.),Growing Points in Ethology (pp. 451–479). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A., Titmus, G., Easton, D., & Tamplin, A. (1985). Incidence of “friendship” and behavior toward strong associates versus nonassociates in preschoolers.Child Development, 56, 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janosz, M., & La Frenière, P.J. (1991). Affectivité, amitié et compétence sociale chez des garçons d’âge préscolaire en situation de ressource limitée.Enfance, 45, 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. (1984). Resolving conflicts in friendship: The development of moral understanding in everyday life. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.),Morality, Moral Behavior and Moral Development (pp. 140–158). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G.W., & Emerson, E.S. (1984). Shared knowledge in children’s friendship.Developmental Psychology, 20, 932–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. (1979).Introduction to Statistics. A Nonparametric Approach for the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, E., Parent, S., Gosselin, C., & Dumont, M. (1994). Attachment and the development of metacognitive and collaborative strategies.International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F.B. (1982). Teaching through social conflict.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., & Aboud, F.E. (1985). The resolution of social conflict between friends. ChildDevelopment, 56, 1009–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A.F., & Brady, J.E. (1982). Mutuality in boys’ friendship relations.Child Development, 53, 392–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A.F., Brady, J.E., & Hartup, W.W. (1979). Friendship and incentive condition as determinants of children’s task-oriented social behavior.Child Development, 50, 878–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F. (1985). Structures et developpement du discours moral. In G. Mugny (Ed.),Psychologie Sociale du Développement Cognitif (pp. 185–201). Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1979).La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Nicolet, N. (1988).Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif. Fribourg-Suisse: Editions Delval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Perret, J.-F., & Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 41–63). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., & Grossen, M. (1991). Interactions sociales dans le développement cognitif: nouvelles directions de recherche.Cahiers de psychologie, 17–39. Rapport d’activité du Séminaire de Psychologie, avril. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 639–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pochon, L.-O. (1991). Statistiques et sciences humaines. Notes de travail.Dossiers de psychologie, No 38, Séminaire de psychologie. Université de Neuchâtel.

  • Rommetveit, R. (1979). On Common codes and dynamic residuals in human communication. In R.M. Blakar & R. Rommetveit (Eds.),Studies of Language, Thought and Verbal Communication. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A.W.N., & Howe, C.J. (1990). Effects of cognitive conflict, socio-cognitive conflict and imitation on children’s socio-legal thinking.European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, R.L. (1980).The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S.R., Hills, H.I., Kilmartin, C.T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B.N., Strickland, D., & Meyer III, C.W. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R.E., Provost, M.A., & Strayer, F.F. (1985).Ethologie et développement de l’enfant. Paris: Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1978). The nature of social development: A conceptual discussion of Cognition. In H. McGurk (Ed.),Psychology in Progress, Issues in Childhood Social Development (pp. 203–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., & Smollar, J. (1985).Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumont, M., Moss, E. Verbal discussions about social problem-solving between friends and non-friends. Eur J Psychol Educ 11, 343–360 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172945

Key words

Navigation