Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of cooperation on spelling achievement at three age levels (Grades 2, 4, and 6)

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a field experiment among second, fourth and sixth grade pupils from 27 primary schools, two instruction methods were compared. At 13 schools (control condition) pupils did spelling exercises as usual, i.e. individually. At 14 schools pupils worked in pairs; each pupil was asked to check a partners’ work and discuss mistakes. At grade 2 cooperation led to less off-task behaviour when pupils did spelling assignments of a more complex type. Nevertheless we found a negative effect on achievement. At grade 4 cooperation led to less off-task behaviour for complex assignments and an increase in pupil’s effort as rated by their teachers as well. These findings were accompanied by a weak effect on achievement. Cooperation did not affect effort nor achievement of pupils from grade 6. At none of three grade levels we found indications of better reasoning strategies as a consequence of pair learning. The differential effect of cooperation at the three age levels may be explained in terms of complexity of learning subject and of lesson type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assink, E. M. H. (1983).Leerprocessen bij het spellen. Aanzet voor de ver-verbetering van de werkwoordsdidaktiek. Academisch proefschrift. (Learning processes in spelling. Initiative to improvement of teaching form verbs). Dissertation at the University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. Utrecht: Elinkwijk BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: a review and analysis.Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984).The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1982). Conservation, what is the question?British Journal of Psychology, 73, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., White, J., & Lobato, D. (1982). Social skills and nonverbal behavior. In R. S. Feldman, (Ed.),Development of nonverbal behavior in children, (pp. 259–277). New-York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (1978).Multivariance: Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance, regression and repeated measures. User’s guide. Chicago: International Educational Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1985).Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, M. (1988). Interactions entre pairs et constructions cognitives: des travaux expérimentaux de laboratoire au terrain pédagogique.European Journal of Psychology of Education, Numero Special Hors-serie, 127–138.

  • Gilly, M. (1990). Mecanismes psychosociaux des constructions cognitives: perspectives de recherche à l’âge scolaire. In N. Netchine-Grynberg (Ed.),Developpement et fonctionnement cognitifs chez l’enfant, (pp. 201–222). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, V. W., & Sherman, J. A. (1973). Effect of peer-tutoring and consequences on math performance of elementary classrooms students.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 6, 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1986). Academic conflict among students: controversy and learning. In R. S. Feldman, (Ed.),The social psychology of learning. Current research and theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effect of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal strutures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. P., & Kagan, S. (1977). Development of prosocial and competitive behaviors in Anglo-American and Mexican-American children.Child Development, 48, 1385–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomov, B. F. (1978). Psychological processes and communication.Soviet Psychology, 1, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. S., & Underwood, B. (1981). The development of prosocial behavior. In S. S. Brehm, S. M. Kassin, & B. F. X. Gibbons, (Eds.),Developmental social psychology, (pp. 72–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepitone, E. A. (1980).Children in cooperation and competition. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980).Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A. N., & Schubauer-Leoni, M. L. (1981). Conflict and cooperation as opportunities for learning. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.),Communication in development, (pp. 203–233). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Janicki, T., & Swing, S. (1981). Ability × Treatment interaction effects on children’s learning in largegroup and small-group approaches.American Educational Research Journal, 18, 453–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning.Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1983) When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools.Journal of Social Issues, 41, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1986). Cooperative learning: engineering social psychology in the classroom. In R. S. Feldman, (Ed.),The social psychology of learning. Current research and theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: a reconciliation.Child Development, 58, 1161–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taal, M. (1984).Socio-cognitief conflict en cognitieve ontwikkeling. Dissertatie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam. (Sociocognitive conflict and cognitive development. Dissertation at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

  • Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Berkum, G. van, & Swen-Koopmans, T. (1987). Effect of cooperation and shared feedback on spelling achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 92–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Wiersema, B., & Yperen, N. van. (1987). Effects of cooperation and feedback by fellow-pupils on spelling achievement.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, P. (1985).Cooperative learning. A study on processes and effect of cooperation between primary school children’s. Gravenhage, The Netherlands: Stichting voor Onderzoek voor het onderwijs, report SVO-1041.

  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups.International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, B. D., & Bearison, D. J. (1985). Social interaction, social observation and cognitive development in young children.European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R., & Ryan, F. L. (1973). Effects of cooperative and competitive classrooms environments on the attitudes and achievement of elementary school students engaged in social studies inquiry activities.Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 402–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was made possible by a grant from the Institute for Educational Research in The Netherlands.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiersema, B., van Oudenhoven, J.P. Effects of cooperation on spelling achievement at three age levels (Grades 2, 4, and 6). Eur J Psychol Educ 7, 95–108 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172887

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172887

Key words

Navigation