Skip to main content
Log in

Memory suggestibility and metacognition in child eyewitness testimony: The roles of source monitoring and self-efficacy

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children can easily be made to believe that they have seen or experienced something that they never did. This phenomenon is called the misinformation effect. In this paper I examine the mechanisms underlying the misinformation effect in 6- and 9-year-old children, by investigating the influence of two metacognitive variables, source monitoring and self-efficacy, on child suggestibility (Experiment 1). Several investigations have reported that source monitoring is one factor at play in creating the misinformation effect. As for self-efficacy, this is the first attempt to investigate its relationship with memory suggestibility. It is demonstrated that source monitoring is related to memory suggestibility in younger children, whereas self-efficacy plays a role in suggestibility mainly in older children. This indicates that suggestibility may be due to two different mechanisms at the two ages examined. Experiment 2 was designed to test this age-interactive hypothesis. Results confirmed that the misinformation effect in younger children was mainly due to genuine memory errors, whereas in older children it was mainly due to acceptance of the misleading information.

Résumé

Les enfants peuvent être facilement conduits à croire qu’ils ont vu quelque chose, ou fait l’expérience de quelque chose, qu’ils n’ont jamais vu ou fait. Ce phénomène est appelé l’effet d’information erronée. L’auteur examine les mécanismes sous-tendant cet effet chez des enfants de 6 et 9 ans, en étudiant l’influence de deux variables métacognitives, contrôlabilité de la source et sentiment d’auto-efficacité, sur la suggestibilité enfantine (1ère expérience). Plusieurs recherches ont indiqué que la contrôlabilité de la source est un facteur en jeu dans la création de l’effet d’information erronée. En ce qui concerne le sentiment d’auto-efficacité, c’est la première tentative d’étude des relations avec la suggestibilité de la mémoire. On montre que la contrôlabilité de la source entretient des relation avec la suggestibilité de la mémoire chez les plus jeunes enfants, alors que le sentiment d’auto-efficacité joue un rôle surtout chez les enfants plus âgés. Cela signifie que la suggestibilité peut être due à deux processus différents aux deux âges étudiés. La seconde expérience a eu pour but de tester cette hypothèse d’interaction avec l’âge. Les résultats confirment que l’effet d’information erronée chez les jeunes enfants a été dû principalement à d’authentiques erreurs de mémoire, alors que chez les enfants plus âgés il a été dû principalement à l’acceptation d’informations erronées.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belli, R.F. (1989). Influences of misleading post-event information: Misinformation interference and acceptance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, R.F., Lindsay, D.S., Gales, M.S., & McCarthy, T.T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals.Memory and Cognition, 22, 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition. Interdependence of metacognition, attributions and self-esteem. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.),Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instructions (pp. 53–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.G., Ryan, E.B., Kurtz, B.E., & Reid, M.K. (1983). Metamemory and metalinguistic development: Correlates of children’s intelligence and achievement.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C.J. (1995). Interference processes in memory development: The case of cognitive triage. In F.N. Dempster & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 105–139). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C.J., Reyna, V.F., Howe, M.L., & Kingma, J. (1990). The development of forgetting and reminiscence.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,55 (3–4, Serial No. 222).

  • Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology (Vol. III, Cognitive Development, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M., Ceci, S.J., Francoeur, E., & Barr, R. (1995). “I hardly cried when I got my shot!”: Influencing children’s memories about a visit to their pediatrician.Child Development, 66, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 403–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S.J., Ross, D., & Toglia, M. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility: Psycholegal implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C. (in press). The impact of metacognitive reflection on cognitive control. In G. Mazzoni, T.O. Nelson (Eds.),Monitoring and control processes in metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • DeBeni, R., & Mazzoni, G. (1991). Attribuzione e fiducia nelle proprie abilita’ mnestiche, il livello strategico e la prestazione di memoria in bambini di eta’ diverse.Età Evolutiva, 38, 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBeni, R., Mazzoni, G., & Pagotto, S. (in press). Autostima, attribuzione e meta-conoscenza in soggetti anziani.Ricerche di Psicologia.

  • Fivush, R., & Shukat, J. (1995). What young children recall: Issues of content, consistency, and coherence of early autobiographical recall. In M.S. Zaragoza, J.R. Graham, G.C.N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y.S. Ben-Porath (Eds.),Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 5–23). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M.A., Johnson, M.K., & Raye, C.L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech.Child Development, 54, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garry, M.A. & Loftus, E.F., & Brown, S.W. (1994). Memory: A river runs through it.Consciousness & Cognition, 3, 438–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G.S., Aman, C., & Hirshman, J. (1987). Child sexual and physical abuse: Children’s testimony. In Ceci, S.J., Toglia, M.P., & Ross, D.F. (Eds.),Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 1–23). New York, Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., Brown, E., Marriott, C., Whittall, S., & Harmer, S. (1991). Monsters, ghosts and witches: Testing the limits of the fantasy-reality distinction in young children.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D.J. (1989).Self-efficacy questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R.A. (1994). Metacognitive development ina adulthood and old age. In J. Metcalfe & A.P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 227–251). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., Dixon, R.A., & Hultsch, D.F. (1990). Metamemory in adulthood: Differentiating knowledge, belief and behavior. In T.M. Hess (Ed.),Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 161–212). New York, Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source Monitoring.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R.V. (1989).The development of memory in children (2nd ed.), New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R.V., & Hagen, J.W. (Eds.) (1977).Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for sources.Memory and Cognition, 17, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D.S., Johnson, M.K., & Kwon, P. (1991). Developmental changes in source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report.Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F., Garry, M., Brown, S.W., & Reder, M. (1994). Near-natal memories, past-life memories and other memory myths.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis.

  • Lynn, S.L. (1996).Hypnotizability and suggestibility. Paper presented at the IV ASI NATO Meeting on Memory for Traumatic Events, Port Bourgenay.

  • Mazzoni, G. (1991). Differenze individuali nella tendenza alla suggestionabilita’.Età Evolutiva, 38, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., & De Beni, R. (1989).The relationship between metamemory and memory: Attribution and memory beliefs on strategy and memory. 10th Biennal Meeting of ISSBD, Yuvaskyla, Finland.

  • McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, & Wagenaar.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morison, P., & Gardner, H. (1978). Dragons and dinosaurs: The child’s capacity to differentiate fantasy from reality.Child Development, 49, 642–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, P.A. (Ed.) (1978).Memory development in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, P.A., Gordon, B.N., & Larus, D. (1992). Children’s memory for a personally experienced event: Implications for testimony.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D.S. (1995). Interviewing preschoolers: effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E.S. (1989). Metacognitive benefits of taking a test for children and young adolescents.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 430–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringel, B.A., & Springer, C.J. (1980). On knowing how well one is remembering: The persistence of strategy use during transfer.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L., & Goodman, G.S. (1991). Effects of participation in children’s reports: Implications for children’s testimony.Developmental Psychology, 27, 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1986). The role of conceptual knowledge and metamemory in the development of organizational processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 218–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Borkowski, J.G., Kurtz, B.E., & Kerwin, K. (1986). Metamemory and motivation: A comparison of strategy use and performance in German and American children.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider W., & Pressley, M. (1989).Memory development between two and twenty. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toglia, M.P., Ross, D.F., Ceci, S.J. (1992). The suggestibility of children’s memory: A cognition and social-psychological interpretation. In M.H. Howe, C.J. Brainerd, & V.F. Reyna (Eds.),The development of long-term retention (pp. 217–241). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt, K.R., Loftus, E.F., & Lindsay, D.S. (1995). Misinformation revisited: New evidence on the suggestibility of memory.Memory and Cognition, 23, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, E., Glover, T.A., & Peluso, J. (1996).Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazzoni, G. Memory suggestibility and metacognition in child eyewitness testimony: The roles of source monitoring and self-efficacy. Eur J Psychol Educ 13, 43–60 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172812

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172812

Key words

Navigation