European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 439–458 | Cite as

Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom

Article

Abstract

One explanation for the widening achievement gap in America and throughout Europe between ethnic minorities/immigrants, and Whites is the influence of cultural stereotypes on attributions made by both educators and students. This paper explores some factors that increase the likelihood that educators will consciously or unconsciously rely on stereotypes to disambiguate attributional judgments of students. Specifically, the fundamental drive to make attributions in educational settings combine with a norm and pressure for internality judgments in achievement- related domains. These pressures place an extra burden on educators to look for internal causes for student achievement. When that pressure is combined with cognitive overload, motivational barriers, status and hierarchy disparities, and students’ more salient group membership, stereotypes emerge as likely candidates for attributions. The psychological and motivational consequences of attributional stereotypes are discussed in terms of their effects on both educators and students as a function of the distinct attributional patterns implied by stereotypes.

Key words

Attributions Classroom discrimination Education Self-esteem Stereotypes 

Résumé

Une explication de l’écart de plus en plus important entre la réussite des blancs et des minorités ethnique/émigrantes aux USA et en Europe tient dans l’influence des stéréotypes culturels concernant les attributions émises par les enseignants et les étudiants. Dans ce manuscrit, sont traités des facteurs qui augmentent la sensibilité des enseignants à se reposer, consciemment ou inconsciemment, sur les stéréotypes afin de lever l’ambiguïté du jugement attributionnel émis à l’égard des étudiants. Plus spécifiquement, la tendance fondamentale à émettre des inférences dans le contexte scolaire se double d’une norme et d’une pression aux jugements internes dans les domaines liés à la performance. Ces pressions conduisent les enseignants à rechercher des causes internes à la performance des étudiants. Lorsque cette pression se double d’une surcharge cognitive, de barrières motivationnelles, de disparités hiérarchiques, de différences de statut, et d’une appartenance groupale saillante des étudiants, les stéréotypes sont alors de bons candidats comme facteurs attributionnels. Les conséquences psychologiques et motivationnelles sur les enseignants et les étudiants sont discutées pour différents types de stéréotypes attributionnels.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., & Teasdale, J.D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C.M. (1996, Summer). Gifted girls in science: Revisiting the issues.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 4, 447–458.Google Scholar
  3. American Association of University Women (1991).Shortchanging girls. Shortchanging America: Executive Summary. http://www.aauw.org/research/upload/SGSA-2.pdf (last viewed 4/5/08)Google Scholar
  4. American Association of University Women (2002). How schools shortchange girls. In F. Schultz (Ed.),Notable selections in education (pp. 242–249). Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, C.A., & Jennings, D.L. (1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attributing failure to ineffective strategies.Journal of Personality, 48, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, C.A., Krull, D.S., & Weiner, B. (1994). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.),Social psychology: Handbook of basic mechanisms (pp. 271–296). New York; Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, G.R., & Debus, R.L. (1978). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banaji, M.R., & Greenwald, A.G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M.P. Zanna & J.M. Oleson (Eds.),The Psychology of Prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 7, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Beauvois, J., & Dubois, N. (1988). The norm of internality in the explanation of psychological events.European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beauvois, J., Gilbert, D., & Pansu, P., & Abdelaoui, S. (1998). Internality attribution and intergroup relations.European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesanz, J.C., Neuberg, S.L., Smith, D.M., Asher, T., & Judice, T.N. (2001). When accuracy-motivated perceivers fail: Limited attentional resources and the reemerging self-fulfilling prophecy.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blaine, B., Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1995). The unintended negative consequences of sympathy for the stigmatized.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 889–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandler, T.A., & Spies, C.J. (1992). Relationship of attribution, expectancy, performance, and perceived success to change in examination preparation strategies.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C.M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & L. Gardner (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed. pp. 504–553). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darley, J.M., & Zanna, M.P. (1982). Making moral judgments.American Scientist, 70, 515–521.Google Scholar
  19. Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J. (1996). Internality, academic status and intergroup attributions.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 329–341.Google Scholar
  21. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J. (2005). Normativeness and individualism.European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dweck, C.S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dweck, C.S., Davidson, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis.Developmental Psychology, 14, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia (2006). The Annual Report on the Situation Regarding Racism and Xenophobia in the Member States of the EU. European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia. http://eumc.europa.eu/eumc/material/pub/ar06/AR06-P2-EN.pdf (last viewed, september 2007)Google Scholar
  26. Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (1998). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fincham, F.D., & Jaspers, J.M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 13, pp. 82–139). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping.American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiske, S.T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Fiske, S.T. (2001). Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In A.Y. Lee-Chai & J.A. Bargh (Eds.),The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 181–193). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fiske, S.T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context.European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fiske, S.T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S.L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.),Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Forsterling, F. (1985). Attribution retraining: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garcia, D.M., Reser, A.H., Amo, R.B., Redersdorff, S., & Brandscombe, N.R. (2005) Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts.Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guzzetti, B.J., & Williams, W.O. (1996, September). Changing the pattern of gendered discussion: Lessons from science classrooms.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 38–47.Google Scholar
  37. Hamilton, D.L. (1979). A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, J.W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R.S. Wyer, Jr. & T.K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition: vol. 1. Basic Processes (2nd ed. (pp. 1–68). Hillsdale, ND: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, J.W., & Ruvolo, C.M. (1990). Sterotyped-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior.Journal of Social Issues, 46, 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.),Psychological perspectives on the self (vol. 3, pp. 136–182) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Harvey, G. (March 1986).Finding reality among the myths: Why what you thought about sex equity in education isn’t so (pp. 509–511). Phi Delta Kappan.Google Scholar
  42. Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations (pp. 164–173). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Heine, S.J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D.R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heilman, M.E. (1996). Affirmative action’s contradictory consequences.Journal of Social Issues, 52, 105–109.Google Scholar
  45. Henry, J.W., Martinko, M.J., & Pierce, M.A. (1993). Attributional style as a predictor of success in a first computer science course.Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Henry, P.J., & Reyna, C. (2007). Value judgments: The impact of perceived value violation on American political attitudes.Political Psychology, 28, 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henry, P.J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2004). Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hirschfield, L.A. (1996).Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and child’s construction of human kinds. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Irvine, J.J. (1985). Teacher communication patterns as related to the race and sex of the student.Journal of Educational Research, 78, 338–345.Google Scholar
  50. Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness.British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  51. Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo.Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Katz, L., & Hass, R.G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kaiser, C.R., & Miller, C.T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaiser, C.R., & Miller, C.T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinder, D.R., & Mendelberg, T. (2000). Individualism reconsidered. In D.O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.),Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 236–279) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, F., & Tiedens, L.Z. (2001). Who’s being served? ‘Self-serving’ attributions in social hierarchiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 254–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luciak, M. (May 2006). The educational situation of migrants and ethnic minorities in 15 EU member states in comparative perspective. InTRANS. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften. No. 15/2003. WWW: http://www.inst.at/trans/15Nr/08_1/luciak15.htmGoogle Scholar
  58. Major, B. (August, 1995).Academic performance, self-esteem, and race: The role of disidentification. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Major, B., Spencer, S., & Schmader, T. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller, J.G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. National Governors Association (2007). Closing the achievement gap. http://www.subnet.nga.org/educlear/achievement/(last viewed 9/18/07)Google Scholar
  63. Overbeck, J.R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson, C., & Barrett, L.C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshmen.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pettigrew, T.F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Power, J.G., Murphy, S.T., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups.Human Communication Research, 23, 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Resendez, M.G. (2002). The stigmatizing effects of affirmative action: An examination of moderating variables.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reyna, C. (2000). Lazy, dumb, or industrious: When stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom.Educational Psychology Review, 12, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of teachers’ punishment and intervention strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reyna, C., Henry, P.J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2006). Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rhodewalt, F., & Hill, K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Richman, C.L., Bovelsky, S., Kroovand, N., Vacca, J., & West, T. (1997). Racism 102: The Classroom.Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 378–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174–221). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rubovits, P.C., & Maehr, M.L. (1973). Pygmalion black and white.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ryan, C.S., Hunt, J.S., & Weible, J.A. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R.H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement.Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sears, D.O., Henry, P.J., & Kosterman, R. (2000). Egalitarian values and contemporary racial politics. In D.O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.),Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 236–279): Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  78. Shrauger, J.S., & Schohn, M. (1995). Self-confidence in college students: Conceptualization, measurement, and behavioral implications.Assessment, 2, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999).Social dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Steele, C.M. (1998). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. In J.L. Eberhardt & S.T. Fiske (Eds.),Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 202–233), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
  83. Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Orellana-Damacela, L., Portillo, N., Rowan, J.M., & Andrews-Guillen, C. (2003). Experiences of differential treatment among college students of color.The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 428–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sue, S., & Kitano, H.H.L. (1973). Stereotypes as a measure of success.Journal of Social Issues, 29, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tindall, T., & Hamil, B. (2004). Gender disparity in science education: The causes, consequences, and solutions.Education, 125, 282–295.Google Scholar
  87. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987).Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  88. van Laar, C. (2000). The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: An attributional account.Educational Psychology Review, 12, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2001). Social status and the academic achievement gap: A social dominance perspective.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotionPsychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weiner, B. (1986).An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  93. Weiner, B. (1991). On perceiving the other person as responsible. In R.A. Dienstbier (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 165–198. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  94. Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation.American Psychologist, 48, 957–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weiner, B. (1994). Ability versus effort revisited: The moral determinants of achievement-evaluation and achievement as a moral system.Educational Psychologist, 29, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weiner, B. (1995).Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  97. Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attributional perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck (Eds.),Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 73–84). New York, US: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  98. Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation.Journal of Personality and Psychology, 15, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Reyna, C. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment.Social Justice Research, 10, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Williams, J.H., & Muehl, S. (1978). Relations among student and teacher perceptions of behavior.Journal of Negro Education, 47, 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wittenbrink, B., Gist, P.L., & Hilton, J.L. (1997). Structural properties of stereotypic knowledge and their influences on the construal of social situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schandron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P.J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S.A. Haslam (Eds.),The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Oxford: England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDePaul UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations