Abstract
In this paper two models are proposed for analysing transitions in education. Firstly, transitions are the processes that follow ruptures perceived by people. They include learning, identity change, and meaning making processes. Secondly, processes of change are observed through a semiotic prism, articulating self-other-object-sense of the object for self, and located in a specific social frame. Transitions are thus analysed as reconfigurations of such semiotic prism. The paper proposes to highlight the role of institutions as social frames likely to facilitate, or constrain, such reconfigurations. The role of institutions in transitions is discussed through three case studies: the transition to vocational training, the transition out of a religious school, and the transition to work at war-time.
Résumé
Cet article présente deux modèles pour analyser les transitions éducatives. Premièrement, des transitions sont des processus de changement qui suivent des ruptures perçues par les personnes. Ils comprennent des processus d’apprentissage, de changement identitaire et de construction de signification. Deuxièmement, ces processus peuvent être observés au travers d’un prisme sémiotique, qui articule la personne, autrui, l’objet et le sens de l’objet pour la personne, situés dans un cadre social spécifique. Les transitions sont comprises comme des reconfigurations de ce prisme. Le rôle des institutions en tant que cadres sociaux qui peuvent faciliter ou contraindre ces reconfigurations est mis en évidence. Trois études de cas de transitions — vers la formation professionnelle, hors d’une école religieuse, et vers le travail en temps de guerre — soutiennent cette proposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggleton, P., Hart, G., & Davies, P. (Eds.). (1989).AIDS: Social representations, social practices. London: Taylor & Francis.
Baltes, P.B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny. Selection, optimization and compensation as foundation of developmental psychology.American Psychologist, 52(4), 366–380.
Benson, C. (2001).The cultural psychology of self. London: Routledge.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966).The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bloome, D., Sheridan, D., & Street, B.V. (1993).Reading mass-observation writting. Sussex: University of Sussex Library.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977).The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J.S. (1990).Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J.S. (1996).The culture of education. Cambridge MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Cornish, F. (2004).Constructing an actionable environment: Collective action for HIV prevention among Calcutta sex workers. Unpublished PhD thesis, London School of Economics.
Coulon, A. (1997).Le métier d’étudiant [The profession of student]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Dewey, J. (1910).How we think. Lexington, Mass: D. C. Heath.
Doise, W. (1982).L’explication en psychologie sociale [Explanation in social psychology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Dominicé, P. (Ed.). (1985).Pratiques du récit de vie et théories de la formation [Practices of life narrative and theories of training]. Genève: Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’éducation.
Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.),Social representations: Introductions and explorations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity, youth and crisis. London: Faber & Faber.
Erikson, E. H. (1975). “Identity crisis” in autobiographical perspective.Life history and the historical moment (pp. 17–46). New York: WW Norton & Company INC.
Gillespie, A. (2007).Becoming other. From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich (CT): Info Age.
Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., Aveling, E., & Zittoun, T. (2008). Conflicting community commitments: A dialogical analysis of a woman’s diaries kept during World War II.Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1), 35–52.
Goffman, E. (1975).Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Grossen, M. (2000). Institutional framings in learning and teaching. In H. Cowie, V.D. Aalsvort, & N. Mercer (Eds.),Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 21–34). Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Grossen, M., & Oberholzer, V. (2000).Mise en scène d’une leçon de grammaire: Perspectives et variations. Rapport de recherche dans le cadre du PNR39. Berne: Fonds National de la recherche scientifique [The setting of a grammar class: perspectives and variations].
Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A.N. (Eds.). (1992).L’espace thérapeutique, cadres et contextes [The therapeutic space: frame and contexts]. Neuchâtel, Switzerland/Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Lewin, K. (1951).Field theory in Social Sciences. Selected theoretical papers (Ed. S. Cartwright). New York: Harper & Brothers publishers.
Mead, G.H. (1932).Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Monteil, J.-M. (1989).Eduquer et former [Educate and train]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Moscovici, S. (2003). Introduction. Le domaine de la psychologie sociale [The domain of social psychology]. In S. Moscovici (Ed.),Psychologie sociale (pp. 5–22). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1984)
Muller, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1999). Negotiating identities and meanings in the transmission of knowledge: Analysis of interactions in the context of a knowledge exchange network. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.),Learning sites, social and technological resources for learning (pp. 47–60). London: Pergamon.
Peirce, C.S. (1877). The fixation of belief.Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1–15.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2001). Psychologie sociale de la construction de l’espace de pensée [The social psychology of the constrction of the thinking space]. In Ducret (Ed.),Constructivismes: Usages et perspectives en éducation (pp. 65–82). Genève: SRED.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2004). Thinking spaces of the young. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 3–10). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Nicolet, M. (Eds.). (2001).Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif (2nd edition) [Interacting and knowing. Challenges and regulation in cognitive development]. Paris: L’Harmattan. (Original work published 1986)
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Zittoun, T. (2002). Esquisse d’une psychologie de la transition [Sketch for a psychology of transition].Education permanente. Revue Suisse pour la Formation Continue, 1, 12–15.
Piaget, J. (1974).The grasp of conciousness: Action and concept in the young child. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.
Psaltis, C. (2005). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation types and representations of gender. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.
Psaltis, C., & Duveen, G. (2006). Social rRelations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation types and representations of gender.European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 407–430.
Rochex, J.-Y. (1995).Le sens de l’expérience scolaire [The sense of school experience]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Schutz, A. (1944). The Stranger: An essay in social psychology.American Journal of Sociology, 49, 499–507.
Shaffir, W. (1997). Disaffiliation: The experiences ofHaredi Jews. In M. Bar-Lev & W. Shaffir (Eds.),Religion and the social order: Leaving religion and religious life (vol. 7, pp. 205–228). Greenwich, CT/London: Jai Press.
Shaffir, W. (2000). Movements in and out of Orthodox Judaism: The case of penitents and the disaffected. In L.J. Francis & Y.J. Katz (Eds.),Joining and leaving religion: Research perspectives (pp. 269–285). Leominster: Gracewing.
Stiles, W.B. (2005). Case studies. In J.C. Norcross, L.E. Beutler, & R.F. Levant (Eds.),Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 57–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Valsiner, J. (1989).Human development and culture: The social nature of personality and its study. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Valsiner, J. (1998).The guided mind. A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J., & Connolly, K.J. (2003). The nature of development: The continuing dialogue of processes and outcomes. In J. Valsiner & K.J. Conolly (Eds.),Handbook of Developmental Psychology (pp. ix-xviii). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage publications.
Valsiner, J., & Lawrence, J.A. (1997). Human development in culture across the life span. In J.W. Berry, P.R. Dasen & T.S. Saraswathi (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 2, pp. 69–106). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic system approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K.J. Conolly (Eds.),Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–672). London/Thousand oaks/New Delhi: Sage publications.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962).Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press. (Original work published 1934)
West, L. (2006). Managing change and transition. A psychosocial perspective on lifelong learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.),Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts (pp. 39–47). Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Wiener, W.J. (1993). A monument’s moment. The psychology of keeping a diary. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.),The narrative study of lives (pp. 30–58). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zittoun, T. (2004). Preapprenticeship as a transitional space. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 153–176). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zittoun, T. (2006a).Insertions. A quinze ans, entre échecs et apprentissage [Insertions. Being fifteen, from failure to apprenticeship]. Berne: Peter Lang.
Zittoun, T. (2006b).Transitions. Development through symbolic resources. Coll. Advances in Cultural Psychology: Constructing Development. Greenwich (CT): InfoAge.
Zittoun, T. (2006c). Difficult secularity: Talmud as symbolic resource.Outlines, 2, 59–75.
Zittoun, T., Aveling, E.-L., Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (in press). People in transitions in worlds in transition: Ambivalence in the transition to womanhood during WWII. In A.C. Bastos, K. Uriko, & J. Valsiner (Eds.),Cultural dynamics of women’s lives. Trieste: Carlo Amore.
Zittoun, T., Cornish, F., Gillespie, & Aveling, E.-L. (2008). Using social knowledge: A case study of a diarist’s meaning making during World War II. In W. Wagner, T. Sugiman, & K. Gergen (Eds.),Meaning in action: Constructions, narratives and representations (pp. 163–179). New York: Springer.
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development.Human Development, 50, 208–229.
Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The uses of symbolic resources in transitions.Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 415–448.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zittoun, T. Learning through transitions: The role of institutions. Eur J Psychol Educ 23, 165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172743
Received:
Revised:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172743