Skip to main content
Log in

Information exchange in classroom conversation: Negociation and extension of the focus

L’échange d’information dans les conversations en classe: négociation et extension du «focus» du discours

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is concerned with clarifying whether teacher’s communicative strategies affect children’s conversational relevance in classroom discourse.

34 conversations between teacher and children in a nursery school in a Rome suburb of low social class, collected with a «quasi-experimental» methodology, have been audiotaped and analysed. 5961 turns at talk have been categorised in order to identify different levels of relevance of the teacher’s and children’s conversational contributions. Categories describe the links between the present turn and the focus or the topic of the preceding turn. Frequencies of turn categorization were elaborated by computing transitional probabilities.

Results of sequential analysis show that the children most often extend or elaborate on the information introduced by the teacher when the teacher has just extended the topic of a child speaker.

In the group observed in this research peer interaction can however take on a function similar to that of teacher-children interaction: high relevance to a preceding utterance somehow «activates» a subsequent highly relevant contribution by another child.

Résumé

Cette recherche se propose de voir si les stratégies comunicatives de l’enseignant influencent la pertinence des conduites conversationnelles des enfants dans les conversations en classe. 34 conversations, recuellies dans une école maternelle de Rome, avec une méthodologie «quasi-expérimentale», ont été audio —enregistrées et analysées. 5961 tours de parole ont été catégorisés. Les catégories decrivent la liaison entre chaque tour de parole et la centration du tour précédent. Les fréquences des catégorisations ont été elaborées en calculant les probabilités transitionnelles. Les résultats des analyses sequentielles montrent que les interventions où l’enseignant se réfère fortement à la centration introduite par le précédent locuteur sont suivies significativement par des interventions où l’enfant développe et élabore l’information introduite par l’enseignant. Ce même résultat a été observé quand le locuteur précédent est un enfant qui se réfère à la centration du précédent message.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986).Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983).Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camaioni, L. (1986). Interazioni imitative e sviluppo comunicativo.Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 2, 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delemos, C. (1982). La specularità come processo costitutivo nel dialogo e nell’acquisizione del linguaggio. In L. Camaioni (a cura di),La Teoria di J. Piaget (pp. 65–74). Firenze: Giunti Barbera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938).Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A. R., & Garvey, C. (1981). Childrens use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts.Discourse processes, 4, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1983). How children become friends.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48, 1–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 225–242). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1986). Costruzione sociale delle strutture cognitive o costruzione sociale del significato?Rassegna di psicologia, 3, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumbelli, L. (1981).Educazione come discorso. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumbelli, L. (1985).Psicologia dell’educazione. Comunicare a scuola. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, M. (1979).Learning Lessons. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrit, M. (1982). Repeats and reformulations in Primary classrooms as windows of the nature of talk engagement.Discourse Processes, 5, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1978). Studies in dialogue and discourse. III. Utterance structure and utterance function in interrogative sequences.Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 4, 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. E., Bonvilian, J. D., Denninger, M. S., Kaplan, J. B., & Baker, N. D. (1984). Maternal input adjustments and non adjustments as related to children’s linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In A. Pellegrini & T. Yawkey (Eds.),The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 31–56) Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S. (1986). The structure of 5 year olds’ verbal quarrels with peers and siblings.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 141, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, C. (1985). Discutere per ragionare: la costruzione della conoscenza come argomentazione.Rassegna di Psicologia, 1-2, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, R. (1978). Conversational Coherency.Cognitive Science, 2, 283–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951).Client-centered therapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugar, G. W. (1987). Pragmatic aspects of adult-child construction of texts. Paper presented at the Fourth Internacional Congress for the Study of Child Language, 19–24 July, Lund (Sweden).

  • Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975).Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E. (1984). Parent-Child interaction and the development of communicative ability. In R. L. Schiefelbush & J. Pickar (Eds.)The acquisition of communicative competence (pp. 69–107). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Goldfield, B. A. (1982). Building stories: the emergence of information structures from conversation. In D. Tannen (Ed.),Analyzing discourse: text and talk (pp. 127–141). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1976).Language, schools and classrooms. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, D., & Delamont, S. (Eds.) (1976).Explorations in classroom observation. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B. (1985). Social relationship between adults and young children, and their impact on intellectual functioning. In R. A. Hinde, A. N. Perret-Clermont & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Social relationships and cognitive development (pp. 116–130). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1980). Apprenticeship in meaning. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.),Children’s language, Vol. II (pp. 314–328). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1983). Talking with children: the complementary roles of parents and teachers. In M. Donaldson, R. Grieve & C. Pratt (Eds.),Early childhood development and education (pp. 127–150) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells (1985).Language Development in the preschool years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1986). The language experience of five-year-old children at home and at school. In J. Cook-Gumperz (Ed.),The social construction of literacy (pp. 69–93) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orsolini, M. Information exchange in classroom conversation: Negociation and extension of the focus. Eur J Psychol Educ 3, 341–355 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172739

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172739

Key words

Navigation