Skip to main content
Log in

High dependency care: impact of lack of facilities for high-risk surgical patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The difference between the level of care available on general ward areas and intensive care units (ICUs) has resulted in the development of high dependency units (HDUs).

Aims

This study examined the current perioperative management techniques and clinical care settings of high-risk surgical patients in a hospital without a HDU.

Methods

A prospective audit of high-risk surgical patients was performed over an eight-week period. Using a pre-operative questionnaire, the anaesthetist categorised patient suitability for one of three post-operative care areas. In addition, desired and actual post-operative monitoring, pain management and organ support were indicated.

Results

Seven (25%) of 28 patients admitted to ICU were rated HDU suitable indicating inappropriate use of resources, while 27 (75%) of 36 patients admitted to the general ward were categorised as fulfilling HDU admission criteria. A total of 21/27 (78%) and 12/27 (44%) of this latter group had alteration of idealised post-operative pain management and haemodynamic invasive monitoring plans respectively.

Conclusions

The absence of an intermediate care area facility in a tertiary hospital without an acute pain team impacts on the type of perioperative care provided to patients and the optimal use of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ridley SA. Intermediate care, possibilities, requirements and solutions.Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 654–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenham AR, Klein H. High dependency units: role and need.Br J Hosp Med 1996; 56: 192–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peacock JE, Edbrooke DL. Rationing intensive care. Data from one high dependency unit supports their effectiveness.BMJ 1995; 310: 1413.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin CM, Rackow EC, Mamdani B et al. Decreases in mortality on a large urban medical service by facilitating access to critical care.Arch Inter Med 1988; 148: 1403–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leeson-Payne CG, Aitkenhead AR. A prospective study to assess the demand for a high dependency unit.Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 383–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan DW, Bayly PJ, Weldon OG, Jingree M. A prospective two-month audit of the lack of provision of a high dependency unit and its impact on intensive care.Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrow BC, Lavery GG, Blackwood BM et al. The provision of adult intensive care in Northern Ireland with reference to the role of high dependency care.Ulster Med J 1996; 65: 39–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singer M, Myers S, Hall G, Cohen SL, Armstrong RF. The cost of intensive care: a comparison of one unit between 1988 and 1991.Intensive Care Med 1994; 20: 542–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edbrooke DL, Stevens VG, Hibbert CL et al. High dependency units in England — the lack of provision and the cost of the shortfall.Care of the Critically Ill 1997; 13: 112–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stoddart JC. National ITU audit 1992/1993. London. Royal College of Anaesthetists, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Irish Standing Committee National Survey of Intensive Care Units. London: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland, 1994.

  12. Lyons RA, Wareham K, Hutchings HA, Major E, Ferguson B. Population requirement for adult critical-care beds: a prospective quantitative and qualitative study.Lancet 2000; 355: 595–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Colbert SA, Marsh B, Phelan D. Evaluating the feasibility of establishing a high dependency unit and its impact on intensive care.Clinician in Management 2001; 10: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gamil M, Fanning A. The first 24 hours after surgery. A study of complications after 2,153 consecutive operations.Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 712–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A et al. Confidential enquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care.BMJ 1998; 316: 1853–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boots R, Lipman J. High dependency units: Issues to consider in their planning.Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 358–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome.Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 62–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.Br Med J 2000; 321: 1493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pain after Surgery; Report of the Working Party. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 1990.

  20. Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler B et al. Double-masked, randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery.Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1054–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Webster NR. The anaesthetist as perioperative physician.Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 839–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner M, McFarlane HJ, Krukowski ZH. Prospective study of high dependency care requirements and provision.J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999; 44: 19–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones HJ, Coggins R, Lamente J, de Cossart L. Value of a surgical highdependency unit.Br J Surg 1999; 86: 1578–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths 1998/9. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths, 2000.

  25. Stress in Anaesthetists. London: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. R. Loughrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loughrey, J.P.R., Fitzpatrick, G., Connolly, J. et al. High dependency care: impact of lack of facilities for high-risk surgical patients. Ir J Med Sci 171, 211–215 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170283

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170283

Keywords

Navigation