Skip to main content
Log in

Does prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent recurrent biliary problems in patients with gallstones and a normal cholangiogram?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is indicated in patients with confirmed bile duct stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The role of ES in patients with suspected bile duct stones but a normal cholangiogram, in the prevention of recurrent biliary symptoms, when cholecystectomy is not planned, is unclear.

Aim

To determine if prophylactic ES prevents further biliary problems in such patients.

Methods

Patients were identified with gallbladder stones presenting with jaundice, abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) or dilated bile ducts on ultrasound, in whom cholecystectomy was not planned and who had a normal cholangiogram at ERCP. Patients were followed-up to determine the frequency of recurrent biliary problems or repeat investigations.

Results

Forty-one patients were included, of whom 20 had an ES. The frequency of pre-ERCP features did not differ between the two groups. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 15–66). Post-ERCP recurrent abdominal pain (5 vs 3; p=0.39), jaundice (3 vs 1; p=0.28), pancreatitis (0 vs 1; p=0.32), and repeat ultrasound (2 vs 1; p=0.52), ERCP (1 vs 1; p=0.97) or cholecystectomy (2 vs 3, p=0.82) did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Patients with gallstones, suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones and a normal cholangiogram need not have a prophylactic sphincterotomy since there is no reduction in recurrent biliary problems and this potentially increases the morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones.Gut 1984; 25: 587–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winslet MC, Neoptolemos JP. The place of endoscopy in the management of gallstones. Bailliere’s ClinicalGastroenterology 1991; 5: 99–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai ECS, Mok FPT, Tan ESY et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis.N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1582–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Davidson BR, Carr-Locke DL. Multivariate analysis of pre-operative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones: implications for treatment.Ann Surg 1989; 209: 157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tham TCK, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in elderly people.Br Med J 1999; 318: 617–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Welbourn CR, Beckly DE, Eyre-brook IA. Endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis.Gut 1995; 37: 119–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, S.D., Lim, P., Collins, J.S.A. et al. Does prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent recurrent biliary problems in patients with gallstones and a normal cholangiogram?. Ir J Med Sci 171, 197–198 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170279

Keywords

Navigation