Abstract
Background
The National Drug Treatment Reporting System (NDTRS) is the Irish treated-drug misuse surveillance system.
Aim
To measure completeness and accuracy of the NDTRS
Methods
Cross-sectional survey of clinical records and matching NDTRS reporting forms of a random sample of 520 clients attending 4 Dublin treatment centres. Using clients’ clinical records as the gold standard, system completeness (proportion of sample reported to the NDTRS) and accuracy of selected variables (proportion of reported clients’ information on the NDTRS that matched clinical record information) were measured.
Results
452/520 (87%) selected records were retrieved. The NDTRS was only 61.1% (95% Cl 56.5–65.5) complete; completeness differed across treatment centres (21.8%–85.6%, p< 0.0001) and was greater for new and returning clients than for continuing clients (81.7% versus 53.9% respectively, p< 0.0001). Problems were identified with the accuracy of some key variables.
Conclusions
Urgent actions have been taken to improve the completeness and accuracy of the reporting system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rychetnik L, Hawe P, Waters E, Barrat A, Frommer M. A glossary for evidence based public health.J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58:538–545.
Heller RF, Page J. A population perspective to evidence based medicine: “evidence for population health”.J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56:45–47.
Brownson RC, Baker EA, Leet TL, Gillespie KN. Evidencebased public health. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Government of Ireland: Department of Tourism, Sport and Recreation. Building on experience: national drug strategy 2001–2008. Dublin: The Stationary Office, 2001.
Kraus L, Augustin R, Frischer M, Kummler P, Uhl A, Weissing L. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use at a national level in countries of the European Union and Norway.Addiction 2003; 98:471–85.
Hartnoll R. Drug treatment reporting systems and the first Treatment Demand Indicator. Definitive Protocol. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press, 1994.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. EMCDDA Scientific Report: Treatment demand indicator standard protocol 2.0. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 2000.
Drug Misuse Research Division HRB. Occasional Paper No. 8/2002: trends in treated drug misuse in the Eastern Health Board area 1996–1999. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2002.
The Council of the European Union. EU Drugs Strategy, 2005–2012 — Cordrogue 77. Brussles: General Secretariat, 2004.
Sutton M, Maynard M. Are drug policies based on fake statistics?Addiction 1993; 88:455–458.
Crabbe T, Donmall M, Millar T. Validation of the University of Manchester Drug Misuse Database.J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53:159–164.
Frischer M, Norwood J, Heatlie H,et al A comparison of trends in problematic drug misuse from two reporting systems.J Public Health Med 2000; 22:362–367.
Hickman M, Sutcliffe H, Sondhi A, Stimson G. Validation of a regional drug misuse; implications for policy and surveillance of problem drug use in the UK.Br Med J 1997; 315–581.
Hickman M, Sutcliffe H, Sondhi A, Stimson G. Surveillance of problem drug use in the UK; a review of a regional drug misusedatabase. J Public Health Med 1999; 21(271–277).
Mott J, Caddie D, Donmall M. A comparison of doctors’ practice in notifying addicts to the Home Office and reporting them to the North Western Dug Misuse Database.Addiction 1993; 88:249–256.
Wilkinson S, Soteriou T, Gray S, Orme J, Myles J. Artefact or reality? Increases in persons notified to the Regional Drug Misuse Database in the South West of England, 1996–2001.J Public Health 2004; 26:3–5.
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the guidelines working group.MMWR Recomm Rep 2001; 50 (no. RR-13):1–29.
JMP [program]. Version 4.0.4. version: SAS Institute Incorporated, 1989–2001.
STATA [program]. Version 7 version: STATA Corporation, 1984–2001.
Department of Health. Statistics from the Regional Drug Misuse Databases on drug users in treatment in England, 2000/01. London: Department of Health, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kavanagh, P., Long, J. & Barry, J. Completeness and accuracy of the drug treatment reporting system in Dublin, Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 175, 52–56 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03169173
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03169173