Skip to main content
Log in

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of an Irish teaching hospital

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since its introduction, laparoscopic nephrectomy is increasingly being used worldwide as a method of removing the kidney, both in benign disease and in small volume tumours. To our knowledge, we are the first surgeons in Ireland to perform this procedure with results that support its use in select cases.

Aims

We looked at 12 cases of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, which we carried out over a five-year period.

Methods

Of the 12 cases performed, five were for renal cell carcinoma and seven were for benign disease. Regarding patients with carcinoma, careful patient selection was based on physical examination, biochemical renal profile and tumour stage.

Results

Mean tumour size was 3.3cm. Mean specimen weight was 184g (carcinoma) and 42g (benign). Mean surgical time was 90 minutes and average blood loss was 45ml. Average length of hospital stay was 3.5 days. No major complications occurred. Follow-up of those with renal cell carcinoma revealed all to be tumour-free and renal profile studies of all patients fell within the normal range for all parameters.

Conclusions

Our results support previous reports that recommend laparoscopic nephrectomy as a method for removing kidneys with benign disease or with small volume carcinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report.J Urol 1991; 146: 278.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gill IS, Schweizer D, Hobart MG et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland Clinic experience.J Urol 2000; 163: 1665–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Fadden PT. Retroperitoneoscopy: the Washington University Medical School experience.Urology 1994; 43: 446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma. Workgroup No. 3.Cancer 1997; 80.

  5. Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device.J Urol 1992; 148: 1137–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review.J Urol 1995; 154: 479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Washington University experience.Br J Urol 1994; 73: 231–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Foley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, K.A., El-Jack, M.S. & Hegarty, J. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of an Irish teaching hospital. Ir J Med Sci 171, 76–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168956

Keywords

Navigation