Abstract
The authors have been developing a fully automated temporal subtraction scheme to assist radiologists in the detection of interval changes in digital chest radiographs. The temporal subtraction image is obtained by subtraction of a previous image from a current image. The authors' automated method includes not only image shift and rotation techniques but also a nonlinear geometric warping technique for reduction of misregistration artifacts in the subtraction image. However, a manual subtraction method that can be carried out only with image shift and rotation has been employed as a common clinical technique in angiography, and it might be clinically acceptable for detection of interval changes on chest radiographs as well. Therefore, the authors applied both the manual and automated temporal subtraction techniques to 181 digital chest radiographs, and compared the quality of the subtraction images obtained with the two methods. The numbers of clinically acceptable subtraction images were 147 (81.2%) and 176 (97.2%) for the manual and automated subtraction methods, respectively. The image quality of 148 (81.8%) subtraction images was improved by use of the automated method in comparison with the subtraction images obtained with the manual method. These results indicate that the automated method with the nonlinear warping technique can significantly reduce misregistration artifacts in comparison with the manual method. Therefore, the authors believe that the automated subtraction method is more useful for the detection of interval changes in digital chest radiographs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kano A, Doi K, MacMahon H, et al: Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys 21:453–461, 1994
Ishida T, Ashizawa K, Engelmann R, et al: Application of temporal subtraction for detection of interval changes on chest radiographs: Improvement of subtraction image using automated initial image matching. J Digit Imaging 12:77–86, 1999
Ishida T, Katsuragawa S, Nakamura K, et al: Iterative image warping technique for temporal subtraction of sequential chest radiographs to detect interval change. Med Phys 26:1320–1329, 1999
Difazio MC, MacMahon H, Xu XW, et al: Digital chest radiography: Effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. Radiology 202:447–452, 1997.
Kruger RA, Mistretta CA, Houk TL, et al: Computerized fluoroscopy in real time for noninvasive visualization of the cardiovascular system: Preliminary studies. Radiology 130:49–57, 1979.
Buonocore E, Meaney TF, Borkowski GP, et al: Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries: Comparison with conventional aortography. Radiology 139:281–286, 1981.
Sasaki Y, Katsuragawa S, MacMahon H, et al: Application of temporally subtracted images with mobile computed radiography system in screening chest radiographs. Proc CAR 21–24, 1998.
Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, et al: Computed radiography utilizing scanning stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148:833–838, 1983
Nakamori N, Doi K, Sabeti V, et al: Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: Automated analysis of sizes of heart and lung in digital chest images. Med Phys 17:342–350, 1990
Xu XW, Doi K: Image feature analysis for computeraided diagnosis: Accurate determination of ribcage boundary in chest radiographs. Med Phys 22:617–626, 1995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
K. Doi and H. MacMahon are shareholders of R2 Technology, Inc, Los Altos, CA. It is the policy of the University of Chicago that investigators disclose publicly actual or potential significant financial interests that may appear to be affected by research activities.
Supported by USPHS Grants CA62625 and CA64370.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katsuragawa, S., Tagashira, H., Li, Q. et al. Comparison of the quality of temporal subtraction images obtained with manual and automated methods of digital chest radiography. J Digit Imaging 12, 166–172 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168852
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168852