Skip to main content
Log in

Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS)

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the important advantages of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is the time saved in comparison with the conventional system. A group of 100 radiologic studies done in a conventional radiology department is compared with another group of the same number done in a completely filmless PACS department to assess the difference in the radiologist report turnaround time. There was a statistically significant (P<.00001) decrease in the median imaging-to-dictation time (IDT) of the PACS group (3 hours and 40 minutes) in comparison with the pre-PACS group (25 hours and 19 minutes). This can be attributed to the fact that PACS eliminates all the workload associated with hard copy films, thus, improving the department’s efficiency and decreasing the number of lost films.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Honeyman JC, Frost MM, Huda W: Picture archiving and communication system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 23:101–160, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauman RA, Gell G, Dwyer SJ 3rd: Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world—Part 1. J Digit Imaging 9:99–103, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauman RA, Gell G, Dwyer SJ 3rd: Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world—Part 2. J Digit Imaging 9:172–177, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker SH, Arenson RL: Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1:361–371, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, et al: Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Radiology 207:481–485, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inamura K, Umeda T, Harauchi H, et al: Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10:1–9, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook JF, Hansen M, Breitweser J: Optimising radiology in the new picture archiving and communication system environment. J Digit Imaging 10:165–167, 1997 (3 Suppl 1)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, et al: Radiology report times: Impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1153–1159, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Excel 97, 1997, Microsoft Corporation

  10. Stata 5.0, 1997, Stata Corporation, Texas 77840, USA

  11. Mattern CW, King BF Jr, Hangiandreou NJ, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12:155–159, 1999 (Suppl 1)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamm EP, Raval B, West OC, et al: Evaluating the impact of workstation usage on radiology report times in the initial 6 months following installation. J Digit Imaging 12:152–154, 1999 (2 Suppl 1)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Twair, A.A., Torreggiani, W.C., Mahmud, S.M. et al. Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS). J Digit Imaging 13, 175–177 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168392

Key Words

Navigation