Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of three display methods for evaluating CT angiography data for the vascular assessment of renal donors

  • Sessions
  • Session X Enterprise-Wide Issues
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

In conclusion, CTA display methods are useful when evaluating renal vascular anatomy. Cinematic loop appears to be the most useful display method and is significantly more sensitive, specific, and accurate than the 3D-MIP or stack axial when identifying renal arterial anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al: Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 195:457–462, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, et al: Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: Findings in 154 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1325–1330, 1997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gur D, Good WF, Oliver JH: et al: Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates. Radiology 191:119–122, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pace, M.E., Krebs, T.L., Wong-You-Cheong, J.J. et al. Comparison of three display methods for evaluating CT angiography data for the vascular assessment of renal donors. J Digit Imaging 11 (Suppl 1), 145–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168287

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168287

Keywords

Navigation