Abstract
We have developed a microcomputer based system with an application specific software package which permits the direct digitization and analysis of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. The system is highly flexible and anables access to a wide range of image analysis tools through relatively simple software modifications, which cannot be implemented using a standard ultrasound instrument. We have demonstrated the capability of the system by an analysis of a number of morphometric parameters and by a correlation of these measurements with the presence of prostatic cancer. We found that the measurement of the ratio of the anterior-posterior axis to transverse axis and the presumed circular area ratio (PCAR) were significant predictors of prostatic cancer. The sensitivity of the PCAR measurement was 93%, the specificity was 50%, the positive predictive value was 57%, and the negative predictive value was 91%. The high negative predictive values of these parameters may provide objective criteria to allow for selective biopsy of patients. This system provides researchers with an efficient, economical, and flexible method to aid in the analysis of TRUS images in a quantitative manner.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cancer Statistics, 1988. CA 38:14–15, 1988
Baron E, Angrist A. Incidence of occult carcinoma of the prostate after 50 years of age. Arch Pathol 32:787–793, 1941
Andrews GS: Latent carcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Pathol 2:197, 1949
Walsh PC: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, in Harrion JH, Gittes RF, Perlmutter AD, et al (eds): Campbell’s Urology (ed 4) Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1979, p 949
Killian CS, Enrich LJ, Vargas FP, et al: Relative reliability of five serially measured markers for prognosis of progression of prostate cancer. JNCI 76:179–185, 1986
McNeal JE: Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate. Am J Clin Pathol 49:347–357, 1968
Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp-Pedersen ST, et al: Prostate cancer: Comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 168:389–394, 1988
Kimura A, Nakamura S, Niizuma M, et al: Quantitative analysis of ultrasonogram of the prostate. J Clin Ultrasound 14:501–507, 1986
Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanashi Y, et al: Transcrectal ultrasonotomography of the prostate. J Urol 114:734–739, 1975
Beck JR, Shultz EK: The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110:13–20, 1986
Drago JR, Badalament RA, Wientjes MG, et al: Relative value of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in diagnosis and management of adenocarcinoma of prostate. Urology 34:187–190, 1989
Hardeman SW, Causey JQ, Hickey DP: Transrectal ultrasound for staging prior to radical prostatectomy. Urology 34:175–180, 1989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Craine, B.L., Oldani, G., Engel, J.R. et al. Computer-assisted analysis of transrectal ultrasound images. J Digit Imaging 3, 219–225 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168118
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168118