Abstract
Radiologists detect small diagnostic signals in radiographic film images by altering the distance between the eye and the image, effectively zooming in on a particular detail. Details thus enlarged are more perceptible to the viewer. Considering that conventional film images are nearly life-size, the potential for increasing the detection of small signals in this manner is high. Digital images, however, presented in video format are usually smaller than life-size, sometimes more than 50% smaller. While local enlargements using computer-based imaging systems are extremely useful, the radiologist cannot examine a whole, life-size image. The importance of the latter in the diagnostic process is revealed in detection studies using the same images of a chest phantom with small nodular inclusions, in different size formats. A clear positive correlation exists between overall image size and the detection of signals that are of a diagnostically-relevant size. While it is widely accepted that image fidelity is an important determinant in the clinical acceptability of digital radiography, digital image displays should also be large enough to display life-size images.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jaffe CC: Medical imaging, vision and psychophysics. Medical Radiography and Photography, 60:1–48, 1984
Brauer GW, Fisher PD, Hanley JA, et al: Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier. J Digital Imaging 2:42–47, 1989
Seeley GW, Fisher D, Stempski MO, et al: Total digital radiology department: Spatial resolution requirements. AJR 148:421–426, 1986
Lams PM, Cocklin ML: Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: An ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. Radiology 158:11–19, 1986
Kastan DJ, Ackerman LV, Feczki PJ: Digital gastrointestinal imaging: The effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities. Radiology 162:853–856, 1987
Ohara K, Chan HP, Doi K, et al: Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography: Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. Med Phy, 13:304–311, 1986
Kelsey CA, Moseley RD, Brogdon BG, et al: Effect of size and position on chest lesion detection. AJR 129:205–208, 1977
Gray JE, Taylor KW: Detection accuracy in chest radiography. AJR 131:247–253, 1978
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, P.D., Brauer, G.W. Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems. J Digit Imaging 2, 39–41 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168014
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168014