Skip to main content
Log in

Low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis in day case surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of Low molecular weight heparins (LAAWH) in day case/ short-stay surgery is unknown.

Aim

To characterise the current national use of LMWH prophylaxis in specific day and short stay surgeries.

Methods

A standardised anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all consultant general surgeons in Ireland. The operations selected were herniorraphy, anorectal, varicose vein and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

Questionnaires were sent to 82 surgeons in 2003. There was a response rate of 68.3% (56). Fifty-four per cent of respondents said there was a protocol in place for administration of LMWH in day case surgery. Of these 41% were not confident that their protocols were being adhered. Fifty-nine per cent of all respondents said they stratified patients according to individual risk.Thirteen per cent reported occurrence of VTE post day case surgery.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a heterogeneous pattern of administration of LMWH. In the absence of published validated protocols, the authors suggest a consensus day case protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Claggett GP, Reisch JS. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgical patients. Result of meta-anaiysis.Ann Surg 1988; 208:227–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowe GDO, Greer IA, Cooke TG, et al. Risk of and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital patients.BMJ 1992; 305:567–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillies TE, Ruckley CV, Nixon SJ. Still missing the boat with fatal pulmonary embolism.Br J Surg 1996; 83:1394–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nurmohamed MT, Rosendaal FR, Buller HR, et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis.Lancet 1992; 340:152–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollingsworth J, Ghadban W, Kelly A, et al. Unfractionated heparin, time for a change?IMJ 1999; 92:302–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Riber C, Alstrup N, Nymann T, et al. Postoperative thromboembolism after day-case herniorrhaphy.Br J Surg. 1996; 83(3):420–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradbury AW, Chan YC, Darzi A, et al. Thromboembolism prophylaxis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.BJS 1997; 84:962–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowe GD, Osborne DH, McArdle BM. Prediction and selective prophylaxis of venous thrombolism in elective gastrointestinal surgery.Lancet 1982; 1:409–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams EV, Williams RS, Hughes JL, et al. Prevention of venous thrombolism in Wales: results of a survey among general surgeons.Postgrad Med J 2002;78:78–88

    Google Scholar 

  10. Risk of and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital patients. Thromboembolic Risk Factors (THRIFT) Consensus Group.BMJ 1992; 305:567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Shabbir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shabbir, J., Ridgway, P.F., Shields, W. et al. Low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis in day case surgery. Ir J Med Sci 175, 26–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167963

Keywords

Navigation