Abstract
We performed visual comparison of 200 head magnetic resonance (MR) and 200 head computed tomography (CT) images compressed at two levels using standard Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) irreversible compression and a preliminary version of the JPEG 2000 irreversible algorithm. Blinded evaluations by neuroradiologists compared original versus either JPEG or JPEG 2000. We found that this version of JPEG 2000 did not perform as well as the current JPEG for head CTs, but for MR images, JPEG 2000 performed as well or better. Around 7∶1 compression ratio seemed to be a conservative point where there was no perceptible difference.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Wallace GK: The JPEG still picture compression standard. Comm ACM 34:30–44, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savcenko, V., Erickson, B.J., Persons, K.R. et al. An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 183–185 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167656
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167656