Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images

  • Posters and Demonstrations
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed visual comparison of 200 head magnetic resonance (MR) and 200 head computed tomography (CT) images compressed at two levels using standard Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) irreversible compression and a preliminary version of the JPEG 2000 irreversible algorithm. Blinded evaluations by neuroradiologists compared original versus either JPEG or JPEG 2000. We found that this version of JPEG 2000 did not perform as well as the current JPEG for head CTs, but for MR images, JPEG 2000 performed as well or better. Around 7∶1 compression ratio seemed to be a conservative point where there was no perceptible difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Wallace GK: The JPEG still picture compression standard. Comm ACM 34:30–44, 1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Erickson MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savcenko, V., Erickson, B.J., Persons, K.R. et al. An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 183–185 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167656

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167656

Keywords

Navigation