Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and function of a desktop viewer at mayo clinic scottsdale

  • SESSION 4A: Electronic Systems Applications: Enterprise
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A clinical viewing system was integrated with the Mayo Clinic Scottsdale picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for providing images and the report as part of the electronic medical record (EMR). Key attributes of the viewer include a single user log-on, an integrated patient centric EMR image access for all ordered examinations, prefetching of the most recent prior examination of the same modality, and the ability to provide comparison of current and past exams at the same time on the display. Other functions included preset windows, measurement tools, and multiformat display. Images for the prior 12 months are stored on the clinical server and are viewable in less than a second. Images available on the desktop include all computed radiography (CR), chest, magnetic resonance images (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (U/S), nuclear, angiographic, gastrointestinal (GI) digital spots, and portable C-arm digital spots. Ad hoc queries of examinations from PACS are possible for those patients whose image may not be on the clinical server, but whose images reside on the PACS archive (10TB). Clinician satisfaction was reported to be high, especially for those staff heavily dependent on timely access to images, as well as those having heavy film usage. The desktop viewer is used for resident access to images. It is also useful for teaching conferences with large-screen projection without film. We report on the measurements of functionality, reliability, and speed of image display with this application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erickson B, Ryan W, Gehring D, et al: Image display for clinicians on medical record workstations. J Digit Imaging 10:38–40, 1997 (suppl)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlicek W, Zavalkovskiy B, Eversman W, et al: Performance and function of a multiple star topology image management system at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale. J Digit Imaging 12:168–174, 1999 (suppl)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson B, Ryan W, Gehring D, et al: Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application. J Digit Imaging 11:137–141, 1998 (suppl)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erickson B, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al: Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 206:599–607, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson B: Picture archiving and communication system activities at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. J Digit Imaging 11:12–15, 1998 (suppl)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Savcenko V, Erickson B, Palisson P, et al: Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 206:609–616, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erickson B, Manduca A, Persons K, et al: Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 10:97–102, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Digital Image Communication in Medicine (DICOM) Standards. Rosslyn, VA, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), 1998

  9. Manduca A, Said A: Wavelet compression of medical images with set partitioning in hierarchical trees. Medical Imaging 1996, Image Display Proc SPIE 2707:192–200, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  10. Otto D, Bernhardt T, Rappbernhardt U, et al: Subtle pulmonary abnormalities—Detection on monitors with varying spatial resolutions and maximum luminance levels compared with detection on storage phosphor radiographic hard copies. Radiology 207:237–242, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parisi S, Mogel G, Dominguez R, et al: The effect of 10∶1 compression and soft copy interpretation on the chest radiographs of premature neonates with reference to their possible application in teleradiology. Eur Radiol 8:141–143, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parasyn A, Hanson R, Peat J, et al: A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physician. J Digit Imaging 11:45–49, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Honea R, Mccluggage C, Parker B, et al: Evaluation of commercial PC-based DIC OM image viewer. J Digit Imaging 11:151–155, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pavlicek W, Owen JM, Peter MB: Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: Comparison with cathode ray tube displays. J Digit Imaging 13:155–161, 2000 (suppl 1)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eversman, W.G., Pavlicek, W., Zavalkovskiy, B. et al. Performance and function of a desktop viewer at mayo clinic scottsdale. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 147–152 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167648

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167648

Keywords

Navigation