Skip to main content
Log in

Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department

  • SESSION 2B: Evaluation of System Components
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the frequency and causes of unsuccessful computed tomography (CT) transmissions in a filmless imaging department and to determine the added efficiency gains provided by the sequential addition of modality worklist software and a major network upgrade. Prospective data on CT transmission error rates were recorded over an 18-month period. During the study interval, modality worklist functionality was added, followed by a network upgrade. Failed transmissions were categorized as to the source of the error (humanv technical), and the specific problem encountered. Prior to the introduction of modality worklist software, the initial CT transmission failure rate was 7.6%, which was primarily the result of human error (69%), in the form of data entry error. Upon the introduction of modality worklist software, the transmission failure rate decreased to 3.5%, with human error accounting for only 16% of all failed transmissions. The subsequent addition of a network upgrade from shared Ethernet to switched Ethernet further reduced the transmission failure rate to 2.0%, which was believed to be the result of a reduction in the number of network collisions. Other sources of failed transmission occur at the levels of the CT scanner (network interface card), picture archiving and communication system (PACS)/hospital information system (HIS) interface, and modality gateway. When planning the transmission from film-based to filmless operation, one should consider various hardware, software, and infrastructural requirements to ensure successful PACS implementation. Software upgrades, in the form of modality worklist software, serve to improve technologist productivity by minimizing data entry error. Infrastructural changes, in the form of network upgrading, ensure proper dissemination of electronic data with decreased frequency of network collisions. Collectively, these improvements lead to enhanced transmission of digital images, resulting in productivity gains within the filmless CT department.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiner BI, Slegel EL, Hooper FJ, et al: Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Radiology 207:481–485, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel EL, Diaconis JD, Pomerantz S, et al: Making filmless radiology work. J Digit Imaging 8:151–155, 1995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel EL, Reiner BI, Protopapas Z, et al: Analysis of the clinical impact of a DICOM HIS/RIS to modality interface and recommendations for improvement. Proc SPIE 3035:146–149, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiner BI, Siegel EL: PACS and productivity, in Siegel EL, Kolodner RM (eds): Filmless Radiology. New York, NY, Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp 103–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Reiner MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiner, B., Siegel, E., Kuzmak, P. et al. Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 79–82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167631

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167631

Keywords

Navigation