Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems

  • SESSION 2A: Electronic Systems Applications: Radiology
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The overall goal of this research is to build a structured reporting system that reduces the cost, delays, and inconvenience associated with conventional dictation and speech recognition systems. We have implemented such a structed reporting system for radiology that replaces current dictation and transcription processes by allowing radiologists and other imaging professionals to select imaging findings from a medical lexicon. The system uses an imaging-specific information model, called a “description set’, to organize selected terms in a relational database. Unique features of the knowledge representation that enhance its expressiveness include its ability to codify uncertainty about an imaging observation and to represent explicity the logical relationships among imaging findings. In addition, the system does not require the user to fill in “blanks’ in a static text template. Instead, it allows entry of terms in arbitrary order and uses automated text-generation techniques to create a text report that referring physicians are accustomed to receiving. In parallel, the system also produces a multimedia report that the referring physician can use as a quick reference. Unlike the results of conventional dictation or speech recognition, each finding is coded in a relational database for later information processing. Thus, the structured report database can be used to index images by content, to provide real-time decision support, to enhance radiologists’ performance, to conduct exploratory clinical research, and to transmit imaging report data to computer-based patients record systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S, et al: Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 191:519–521, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seltzer S, Kelly P, Adams D, et al: Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists’ report signing. AJR 162:775–781, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, et al: Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3:709–717, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman C, Cimino J, and Johnson S: A schema for representing medical language applied to clinical radiology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:233–248, 1994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, et al: An on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology 92:709–713, 1969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenes R, Barnett G, Klein S, et al: Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. N Engl J Med 282:307–315, 1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, et al: A radiology reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res 13:258–270, 1980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell D, Greenes R: Evaluation of UltraSTAR: Performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. JAMIA Symposium Supplement, 1994, pp 216–222

  9. Moorman P, van Ginneken A, Siersema P, et al: Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2:365–373, 1995

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn C, Wang K, Bell D: Structured entry of radiology reports using world-wide web technology. Radiographics 16:683–691, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P: Form-based clinical input from a structured vocabulary: Initial application in ultrasound reporting. JAMIA Symposium Supplement, 1992, pp 789–791

  12. MacGregor J, Lee E, Lam N: Optimizing the structure of database menu indexes: A decision model of menu search. Hum Factors 28:387–399, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parkinson S, Sisson N, Snowberry K: Organization of broad computer menu displays. Int J Man Machine Studies 23:689–697, 1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poon A, Fagan L, Shortliffe E: The Pen-Ivory project: Exploring user interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 3:168–183, 1996

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bidgood D, DICOM Working Group 8: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 23: Structured Reporting. Northfield, IL, College of American Pathologists, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cimino J, Clayton P, Hripcsak G, et al: Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. J Am Med Infermatics Assoc 1:35–50, 1994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott A, Clancey W, Davis R, et al: Methods for generating explantation, in Buchanan B, Shortliffe E (eds): Rule-Based Expert System: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1994, pp 338–362

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curits P. Langlotz MD, PhD.

Additional information

Supported in part by Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Grant No. R43-LM06837 from the National Library of Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langlotz, C.P. Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 49–53 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167624

Keywords

Navigation