Abstract
The progressive use of digital image—generating devices and digital communication technology in clinical and practice environments implies changes in radiological workflow and asks for adequate quality assurance in the whole process of radiology report preparation. This improvement potential has to be rigorously reinvestigated with regard to up-to-date procedures and the full exploitation of supporting technologies like linguistic analysis, help desk and trouble ticket systems, competitive allocation algorithms, time-and-event monitoring, and intelligent agents. These approaches are to be evaluated in combination with business process analysis and shall help to reduce turnaround timesfor radiology reports while maintaining or even increasing quality-assurance levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeJarnette WT, Csipo D, Orth A, et al: A standards based distributed PACS architecture. DeJarnette Research Systems, Inc. SCAR 99, 16th Symposium for Computer Applications in Radiology, Houston, TX, May 1999
Schmidt J: Workflow management systems—A powerful means to integrate radiological processes and application systems. Philips Research Laboratories. SCAR 99, 16th Symposium for Computer Applications in Radiology, Houston, TX, May 1999
Eichelberg M, Riesmeier J, Kleber K, et al: Consistency of softcopy and hardcopy: Preliminary experiences with the new DICOM extensions for image display. Medical Imaging 2000, Spie’s International Symposium, San Diego, CA, July 2000
Bollen J, Heylighen F: Cluster analysis of word associations. Principia Cybernetica, Jan 22, 1997:http://pespmcl.vub. ac.be/CLUSTERW.html
Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gebring DG, et al: Image display for clinicians on medical record workstations. J Digit Imaging 10:38–40, 1997 (suppl 1)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mack, S., Holstein, J., Kleber, K. et al. New aspects of image distribution and workflow in radiology. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 17–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167617
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167617