Skip to main content
Log in

Design considerations and coil comparisons for 7 T brain imaging

  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of 300 MHz radio-frequency (RF) head coils analogous to those used at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T is complicated by increased dissipative losses in conductive tissue, effects arising from the short RF wavelength in biological tissue (about 13 cm at 300 MHz), and the constraints imposed by the use of head gradient sets desirable for mitigating increased static field susceptibility effects. In this study, five RF head coils were constructed and tested on a 7 T scanner including 2 TEM designs, 2 birdcage designs and a local receive-only array. Signal-to-noise ratio, coil reception profiles and interactions between the coil and dielectric head were examined. Particular attention was placed on the coil’s reception in the neck and shoulders, where the head gradient is unable to spatially encode the image. With the use of conductive shields and distributed capacitance, all of the coil designs could be made to image effectively at high field, but each design was found to have subtle differences in field distribution, interaction with the dielectric boundary conditions of the head and fringe fields in the neck and shoulders. In particular, the birdcage and array coils were found to have reducedB 1 reception field profiles in the neck and shoulders which helped reduce signal detection outside the linear region of the head gradient coil. Although the TEM coils exhibited higher signal detection in the neck and shoulders, all the coils picked up enough signal from these regions to produce artifacts in the brain. These artifacts could be mitigated through use of a conductive shield or by small local dephasing shims sewn into the shoulders of a jacket worn by the subject. Although homogeneous in low-dielectric-constant phantoms, the volume coil’sB 1 profile was strongly peaked in the center of the head, rendering them spatially complementary to that observed in the surface coil array. The image profile of the surface coil was found to be less dramatically changed from patterns observed at lower field strength. Its dielectric brightening pattern was found to depend on the orientation of the coil with respect to the head.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayes C.E., Edelstein W.A., Schenck J.F., Mueller O.M., Eash M.: J. Magn. Reson.63, 622–628 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tropp J.: J. Magn. Reson.82, 51–62 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roemer P.B., Edelstein W.A., Hayes C.E. Souza S.P., Mueller O.M.: Magn. Reson. Med.16, 192–225 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wald L.L., Carvajal L., Moyher S.E., Nelson S.J., Grant P.E., Barkovich A.J., Vigneron D.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.34, 433–439 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roschmann P.: Med. Phys.14, 922–931 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C.: Birdcage Builder. Penn State Center for NMR 1998.

  7. Krause N.: High-Frequency Field System for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Apparatus. US Patent (4506224) 1982.

  8. Bridges J.F.: Cavity Resonator with Improved Magnetic Field Uniformity for High Frequency Operation and Reduced Dielectric Heating in NMR Imaging Devices. US Patent (4751464) 1988.

  9. Vaughan J.T.: Cavity Resonator for NMR Systems. US Patent (5744957) 1998.

  10. Vaughan J.T., Adriany G., Garwood M., Yacoub E., Duong T., DelaBarre L., Andersen P., Uĝurbil K.: Magn. Reson. Med.47, 990–1000 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaughan J.T., Hetherington H.P., Otu J.O., Pan J.W., Pohost G.M.: Magn. Reson. Med.32, 206–218 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaughan J.T., Garwood M., Collins C.M., Liu W., DelaBarre L., Adriany G., Andersen P., Merkle H., Goebel R., Smith M.B., Uĝurbil K.: Magn. Reson. Med.46, 24–30 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robitaille P.M.: J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.23, 879–890 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins C.M., Smith M.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.45, 684–691 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim T.: IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.52, 1999–2003 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins C.M., Li S., Smith M.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.40, 847–856 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoult D.I., Chen C.N., Sank V.J.: Magn. Reson. Med.3, 730–746 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kangarlu A., Baertlein B.A., Lee R., Ibrahim T., Yang L., Abduljalil A.M., Robitaille P.M.: J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.23, 821–831 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smythe W.R.: Static and Dynamic Electricity. New York: McGraw-Hill 1939.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu W., Yang Q.X., Collins C.M., Smith M.B. in: Proceedings of 10th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 18–24, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii (Evelhoch J.L., ed.), p. 915. Honolulu: ISMRM 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vizmuller P.: RF Design Guide, Systems, Circuits, and Equations, p. 70. Boston: Artech House 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keltner J.R., Carlson J.W., Roos M.S., Wong S.T., Wong T.L., Budinger T.F.: Magn. Reson. Med.22, 467–480 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robitaille P.M., Kangarlu A., Abduljalil A.M.: J. Comput Assist. Tomogr.23, 845–849 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck B.L., Jenkins K., Caserta J., Padgett K., Fitzsimmons J., Blackband S.J.: Magn. Reson. Med.51, 1103–1107 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tropp J.: J. Magn. Reson.167, 12–24 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. McKinnon G., Boscamp E. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 1642, Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibrahim T.S., Abduljalil A.M., Baertlein B.A., Lee R., Robitaille P.M.: Phys. Med. Biol.46, 2545–2555 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiggins G., Triantafyllou C., Wiggins C., Potthast A., Wald L.L. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 36, Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang C., Yuan J., Wu B., Shen G.X. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 487. Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alsop D.C., Connick T.J., Mizsei G.: Magn. Reson. Med.40, 49–54 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. King S.B., Volotovsky V., Duensing G.R., Tomanek B. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 1559. Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibrahim T.S., Lee R., Baertlein B.A., Abduljalil A.M., Zhu H., Robitaille P.M.: Magn. Reson. Imaging19, 1339–1347 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin F.H., Chen Y.J., Belliveau J.W., Wald L.L.: Hum. Brain Mapp.19, 96–111 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wald, L.L., Wiggins, G.C., Potthast, A. et al. Design considerations and coil comparisons for 7 T brain imaging. Appl. Magn. Reson. 29, 19–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166954

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166954

Keywords

Navigation