Abstract
The development of 300 MHz radio-frequency (RF) head coils analogous to those used at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T is complicated by increased dissipative losses in conductive tissue, effects arising from the short RF wavelength in biological tissue (about 13 cm at 300 MHz), and the constraints imposed by the use of head gradient sets desirable for mitigating increased static field susceptibility effects. In this study, five RF head coils were constructed and tested on a 7 T scanner including 2 TEM designs, 2 birdcage designs and a local receive-only array. Signal-to-noise ratio, coil reception profiles and interactions between the coil and dielectric head were examined. Particular attention was placed on the coil’s reception in the neck and shoulders, where the head gradient is unable to spatially encode the image. With the use of conductive shields and distributed capacitance, all of the coil designs could be made to image effectively at high field, but each design was found to have subtle differences in field distribution, interaction with the dielectric boundary conditions of the head and fringe fields in the neck and shoulders. In particular, the birdcage and array coils were found to have reducedB 1 reception field profiles in the neck and shoulders which helped reduce signal detection outside the linear region of the head gradient coil. Although the TEM coils exhibited higher signal detection in the neck and shoulders, all the coils picked up enough signal from these regions to produce artifacts in the brain. These artifacts could be mitigated through use of a conductive shield or by small local dephasing shims sewn into the shoulders of a jacket worn by the subject. Although homogeneous in low-dielectric-constant phantoms, the volume coil’sB 1 profile was strongly peaked in the center of the head, rendering them spatially complementary to that observed in the surface coil array. The image profile of the surface coil was found to be less dramatically changed from patterns observed at lower field strength. Its dielectric brightening pattern was found to depend on the orientation of the coil with respect to the head.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hayes C.E., Edelstein W.A., Schenck J.F., Mueller O.M., Eash M.: J. Magn. Reson.63, 622–628 (1985)
Tropp J.: J. Magn. Reson.82, 51–62 (1989)
Roemer P.B., Edelstein W.A., Hayes C.E. Souza S.P., Mueller O.M.: Magn. Reson. Med.16, 192–225 (1990)
Wald L.L., Carvajal L., Moyher S.E., Nelson S.J., Grant P.E., Barkovich A.J., Vigneron D.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.34, 433–439 (1995)
Roschmann P.: Med. Phys.14, 922–931 (1987)
Chen C.: Birdcage Builder. Penn State Center for NMR 1998.
Krause N.: High-Frequency Field System for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Apparatus. US Patent (4506224) 1982.
Bridges J.F.: Cavity Resonator with Improved Magnetic Field Uniformity for High Frequency Operation and Reduced Dielectric Heating in NMR Imaging Devices. US Patent (4751464) 1988.
Vaughan J.T.: Cavity Resonator for NMR Systems. US Patent (5744957) 1998.
Vaughan J.T., Adriany G., Garwood M., Yacoub E., Duong T., DelaBarre L., Andersen P., Uĝurbil K.: Magn. Reson. Med.47, 990–1000 (2002)
Vaughan J.T., Hetherington H.P., Otu J.O., Pan J.W., Pohost G.M.: Magn. Reson. Med.32, 206–218 (1994)
Vaughan J.T., Garwood M., Collins C.M., Liu W., DelaBarre L., Adriany G., Andersen P., Merkle H., Goebel R., Smith M.B., Uĝurbil K.: Magn. Reson. Med.46, 24–30 (2001)
Robitaille P.M.: J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.23, 879–890 (1999)
Collins C.M., Smith M.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.45, 684–691 (2001)
Ibrahim T.: IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.52, 1999–2003 (2004)
Collins C.M., Li S., Smith M.B.: Magn. Reson. Med.40, 847–856 (1998)
Hoult D.I., Chen C.N., Sank V.J.: Magn. Reson. Med.3, 730–746 (1986)
Kangarlu A., Baertlein B.A., Lee R., Ibrahim T., Yang L., Abduljalil A.M., Robitaille P.M.: J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.23, 821–831 (1999)
Smythe W.R.: Static and Dynamic Electricity. New York: McGraw-Hill 1939.
Liu W., Yang Q.X., Collins C.M., Smith M.B. in: Proceedings of 10th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 18–24, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii (Evelhoch J.L., ed.), p. 915. Honolulu: ISMRM 2002.
Vizmuller P.: RF Design Guide, Systems, Circuits, and Equations, p. 70. Boston: Artech House 1995.
Keltner J.R., Carlson J.W., Roos M.S., Wong S.T., Wong T.L., Budinger T.F.: Magn. Reson. Med.22, 467–480 (1991)
Robitaille P.M., Kangarlu A., Abduljalil A.M.: J. Comput Assist. Tomogr.23, 845–849 (1999)
Beck B.L., Jenkins K., Caserta J., Padgett K., Fitzsimmons J., Blackband S.J.: Magn. Reson. Med.51, 1103–1107 (2004)
Tropp J.: J. Magn. Reson.167, 12–24 (2004)
McKinnon G., Boscamp E. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 1642, Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.
Ibrahim T.S., Abduljalil A.M., Baertlein B.A., Lee R., Robitaille P.M.: Phys. Med. Biol.46, 2545–2555 (2001)
Wiggins G., Triantafyllou C., Wiggins C., Potthast A., Wald L.L. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 36, Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.
Wang C., Yuan J., Wu B., Shen G.X. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 487. Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.
Alsop D.C., Connick T.J., Mizsei G.: Magn. Reson. Med.40, 49–54 (1998)
King S.B., Volotovsky V., Duensing G.R., Tomanek B. in: Proceedings of 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan (Duerk J.L., ed.), p. 1559. Kyoto: ISMRM 2004.
Ibrahim T.S., Lee R., Baertlein B.A., Abduljalil A.M., Zhu H., Robitaille P.M.: Magn. Reson. Imaging19, 1339–1347 (2001)
Lin F.H., Chen Y.J., Belliveau J.W., Wald L.L.: Hum. Brain Mapp.19, 96–111 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wald, L.L., Wiggins, G.C., Potthast, A. et al. Design considerations and coil comparisons for 7 T brain imaging. Appl. Magn. Reson. 29, 19–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166954
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166954