Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative renography with the organ volume method and interporative background subtraction technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When quantification of renal activity is performed by planar imaging, many correction factors must be considered. To obtain quantitative renal images and renogram, we have examined our proposed method by using the organ volume for scatter, attenuation, and background activity, and the interporative background subtraction (IBS) technique in phantom and clinical studies. A renal phantom study was performed by varying the renal depth from 3 to 11 cm and the kidney-to-background activity concentration ratio from 5 to 80. Planar images were properly corrected for scatter, attenuation and background activity by our method and the corrected images were compared with the images obtained by the conventional method for the estimation of true renal activity. Clinical Tc-99m DTPA dynamic data for both a good and a poor renal function were also corrected by our method and volume-corrected renograms were obtained. For the phantom study, depth-independent images were obtained and these images gave a good estimation of the true count rate. In the clinical study, the conventional renogram was especially modified to allow for oversubtraction of background counts in the early phase (0–4 min). In conclusion, our proposed correction method can assess renal function qualitatively and quantitatively in both static and dynamic planar renal imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of Tc-99m DTPA (stanous).AJR 138: 565–570, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gates GF. Split renal function testing using Tc-99m DTPA: A rapid technique for determining deferential glomerular filtration.Clin Nucl Med 8: 400–407, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kojima A, Takaki Y, Matsumoto M, Tomiguchi S, Hara M, Shimomura O, et al. A preliminary phantom study on a proposed model for quantification of renal planar scintigraphy.Med Phys 20: 33–37, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takaki Y, Kojima A, Tsuji A, Nakashima R, Tomiguchi S, Takahashi M. Quantification of renal uptake of technetium-99m-DTPA using planar scintigraphy: a technique that considers organ volume.J Nucl Med 34: 1184–1189, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goris ML, Daspit SG, McLaughlin P, Kriss JP. Interpolative background subtraction.J Nucl Med 17: 744–747, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel JA. The effect of source size in the buildup factor calculation of absolute volume determination.J Nucl Med 26: 1319–1322, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Conrad GR, Wesolowski CA. Avoidance of errors related to renal depth during radionuclide evaluation of renal perfusion.Clin Nucl Med 13: 721–726, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown NJG. The application of interpolative background subtraction to Tc-99m DTPA gamma camera renography data.In: Joekes AM, et al., eds.Radionuclide in Nephrography. London: Academic Press/Grune and Stratton, pp. 113–118, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hurwitz GA, Champagne CL, Gravelle DR, Smith FJ, Powe JE. The variability of processing of technetium-99m DTPA renography: role of interpolative background subtraction.Clin Nucl Med 18: 273–277, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Piepsz A, Dobbeleir A, Ham HR. Background determination for99mTc DTPA renal studies: a comparison between interpolative background subtraction and surface ratio method.Nucl Med Commun 4: 276–281, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sennewald K, Taylor A. A pitfall in calculating differential renal function in patients with renal failure.Clin Nucl Med 18: 377–381, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Piepsz A, Dobbeleir A, Erbsmann F. Measurement of separate kidney clearance by means of99mTc-DTPA complex and a scintillation camera.Eur J Nucl Med 2: 173–177, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Piepsz A, Denis R, Ham HR, Doebbeleir A, Schulman C, Erbsmann F. A simple method for measuring separate glomerular filtration rate using a single injection of99mTc-DTPA and the scintillation camera.J Pediatr 93: 769–774, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shore RM, Koff SA, Mentser M, Hayes JR, Smith SP, Smith JP, et al. Glomerular filtration rate in children: determination from the Tc-99m-DTPA renogram.Radiology 151: 627–633, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenny RW, Ackery DM, Fleming JS, Goddard BA, Grant RW. Deconvolution analysis of the scintillation camera renogram.Br J Radiol 48: 481–486, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diffey BL, Hall FM, Corfield JR. The99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scan with deconvolution analysis.J Nucl Med 17: 352–355, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Piepsz A, Ham HR, Erbsmann F, Hall M, Diffey BL, Goggin MJ, et al. A co-operative study on the clinical value of dynamic renal scanning with deconvolution analysis.Br J Radiol 55: 419–433, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gullquist RR, Fleming JS. Error analysis by simulation studies in renography deconvolution.Phys Med Biol 32: 383–395, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kojima, A., Takaki, Y., Tsuji, A. et al. Quantitative renography with the organ volume method and interporative background subtraction technique. Ann Nucl Med 10, 401–407 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164801

Key words

Navigation