Skip to main content
Log in

Ga-67 citrate scan in vascular graft infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical utility of the Ga-67 scan has been studied in 9 patients with clinical suspicion of vascular graft infection. Eleven grafts were analyzed: 4 aortobifemoral, 2 iliofemoral, 3 femoropopliteal, 1 axillofemoral, and 1 axillobifemoral. The Ga-67 scan was positive in 8 grafts with bacteriological proof of infection and negative in 3 grafts in which infection was ruled out by clinical follow-up. A Ga-67 scan also demonstrated the spread of infection to the thigh in two patients and to the pelvis in another two patients. In 4 patients CT was performed. The CT findings included graft thrombosis, perigraft fluid collection and thickened graft wall. No discrepancies were found between the CT scan and Ga-67 scan. In three patients a control Ga-67 scan was carried out after specific antibiotic and surgical treatment. Two of these showed increased Ga-67 uptake and spreading of infection along the graft; in the other patient, a Ga-67 scan revealed normalization after resolution of an abdominal abscess. In conclusion, the Ga-67 scan proved useful in the diagnosis of vascular graft infection, the definition of location of the extent of the disease and in the evaluation of the efficiency of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorentzen JE, Nielsen OM, Arendrup H, et al: Vascular graft infection: An analysis of sixty two graft infections in 2411 consecutively implanted synthetic vascular grafts.Surgery 98: 81–86, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunt TJ, Haynes JL: Synthetic vascular graft infection: The continuing headache.Am Surg 50: 43–48, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson KK, Russ PD, Bair JH, et al: Diagnosis of synthetic vascular graft infection: Comparison of CT and gallium scans.AJR 154: 405–409, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunt TJ: Synthetic vascular graft infections. I. Graft infections.Surgery 93: 733–746, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vogelzang RL, Limpert JD, Yao JS: Detection of prosthetic vascular complications: Comparison of CT and angiography.AJR 148: 819–823, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson AJ, Astin JK, Peck MR Diagnosis of an abdominal aortic graft abscess by combined ultrasonography and scintigraphy.Clin Nucl Med 4: 338–340, 1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haaga JR, Baldwin N, Reich NE, et al: CT detection of infected synthetic grafts: Preliminary report of a new sign.AJR 131: 317–320, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Justich E, Amparo EG, Hricak H, et al: Infected aortoiliofemoral grafts: Magnetic resonance imaging.Radiology 154: 133–136, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LaMuraglia GM Eischman AJ, Strauss, W, et al Utility of the indium-111 -labeled human irnmunoglobulin G scan for the detection of focal vascular graft infection.J Vasc Surg 10: 20–27, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson DG, Seabold JE, Lieberman LM: Detection of aortoarterial graft infections by leukocyte scintigraphy.Clin Nucl Med 8: 421–423, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung CJ, Hicklin OA, Payan JM, et al: Indium-111-labeled leukocyte scan in detection of synthetic vascular graft infection: The effect of antibiotic treatment.J Nucl Med 32: 13–15, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Banzo J, Prats E, Azcona M, et al: The use of99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scan in the diagnosis of vascular graft infections.Eur J Nucl Med 16: 503, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vorne M, Soini I, Lantto T, et al: Technetium-99m HMPAO-labeled leukocytes in detection of inflammatory lesions: Comparison with Gallium-67 citrate.J Nucl Med 30: 1332–1336, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Causey DA, Fajman WA, Perdue GD, et al:67Ga scintigraphy in postoperative synthetic graft infections.AJR 134: 1041–1045, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thivolle P, Varenne L, Heyden Y, et al: Gallium-67 citrate whole body scanning for the localization of infected vascular synthetic grafts.Clin Nucl Med 10: 330–332, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva J, Harvey WC: Detection of infections with gallium-67 and scintigraphic imaging.J Infect Dis 130: 125–131, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vorne M, Laitinen R, Lantto T, et al: Chronic prosthetic vascular graft infection visualized with Technetium-99m-Hexamethylpropyleneamine Oximelabeled leukocytes.J Nucl Med 32: 1425–1427, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lantto EH, Lantto TJ, Vorne M: Fast diagnosis of abdominal infections and inflammations with technetium-99m-HMPAO labeled leukocytes.J Nucl Med 32: 2029–2034, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. LaMuraglia GM: Chronic prosthetic vascular graft ; infection visualization with Gallium-67.J Nucl Med 32: 1427–1428, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mark AS, McCarthy SM Moss A A, et al: Detection of abdominal aortic graft infection: Comparison of CT and In-labeled white blood cell scan.AJR 144: 315–318, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hilton S, Megibow AJ, Naidich DP, et al: Computed tomography of the postoperative abdominal aorta.Radiology 145: 403–407, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mark A, Moss A A, Lusby R, et al: CT evaluation of complications of abdominal aortic surgery.Radiology 145:409–414, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banzo, I., Quirce, R., Serrano, J. et al. Ga-67 citrate scan in vascular graft infection. Ann Nucl Med 6, 235–239 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164660

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164660

Key words

Navigation