, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 634–645 | Cite as

Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model

  • John M. Mahoney
  • Stewart B. Rood


This paper describes the ‘recruitment box,’ an integrative model that defines the stream stage patterns that enable successful establishment of riparian cottonwood seedlings. In western North America, cottonwood seed dispersal generally occurs after annual peak river flows. The receding stream exposes moist sites upon which seeds land after transport by wind and water. Germination is rapid, and initial seedling establishment is often prolific. However, the vast majority of seedlings die, primarily due to drought stress, as root growth is insufficient to maintain contact with the receding zone of moisture. Cottonwood roots grow about 0.5 to 1 cm per day or 60 to 100 cm in the first year. Along the ‘losing’ streams in semi-arid regions, the riparian water table is an almost horizontal extension from the stream stage. A capillary fringe exists above the water table and is often 30 to 40 cm in elevation, but can range from about 5 to 130 cm depending on substrate texture. The combination of root growth and capillary fringe define the successful recruitment band, which is usually from about 0.6 to 2 m in elevation above the late summer stream stage. Within this range, higher elevation establishment occurs (i) for theAigeiros cottonwoods,Populus deltoides, andP. fremontii, which grow more rapidly thanTacamahaca species and occur in warmer areas with longer growing seasons; (ii) along larger rivers that are characterized by more gradual stage fluctuations; and (iii) along streams with finer substrate. The rate of stream stage decline is also critical for seedling survival and should not exceed 2.5 cm per day. The recruitment box model is consistent with dendrochronological interpretations that moderate flood events are naturally required for cottonwood recruitment. Flood events with recurrences of about 1 in 5 to 1 in 10 years often satisfy the model and provide stream stage patterns with a gradual decline through the recruitment box. The model will facilitate analyses of the reproductive ecology of riparian cottonwoods and also permit the prescription of stream stage patterns for cottonwood seedling recruitment along dammed rivers.

Key Words

cottonwoods hydrology modelling Populus riparian zone seedlings 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Baker, W.L. 1990. Climatic and hydrologic effects on the regeneration ofPopulus angustifolia James along the Animas River, Colorado. Journal of Biogeography 17:59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bessey, D.E. 1904. The number and weight of cottonwood seeds. Science 20:118–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braatne, J.H., S.B. Rood, and P.E. Heilman. 1996. Life history, ecology and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. p. 57–85.In R.F. Stettler, J.H.D. Bradshaw, P.F. Heilman, and T.M. Hinckley (eds.) Biology ofPopulus and Its Implications for Management and Conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, C.E. and D.G. Smith. 1986. Plains cottonwood recruitment and survival on a prairie meandering river floodplain, Milk River, southern Alberta and northern Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1433–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brayshaw, T.C. 1965. The status of the black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torrey and Gray). Canadian Field-Naturalist 79:91–95.Google Scholar
  6. Cordes, L.D. 1991. The distribution and age structure of cottonwood stands along the Lower Bow River, Alberta. p. 13–24.In S.B. Rood and J.M. Mahoney (eds.) Proceedings of the Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods Conference. University of Lethbridge. Lethbridge, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Cordes, L.D., F.M.R. Hughes, and M. Getty. 1997. Factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river: the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Biogeography 24:675–695.Google Scholar
  8. Everitt, B. 1968. Use of the cottonwood in an investigation of the recent history of a flood plain. American Journal of Science 266: 417–439.Google Scholar
  9. Fenner, P.W., Brady, and D. Patton. 1984. Observations on seeds and seedlings of fremont cottonwood. Journal of Desert Plants 6: 55–58.Google Scholar
  10. Finch, D.M. and L.R. Ruggicro. 1993. Wildlife and biological diversity in the Rocky Mountains and north Great Plains. Natural Areas Journal 13:191–203.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, J.M., M.L. Scott, and G.T. Auble. 1997. Water management and cottonwood forest dynamics along prairic streams. p. 49–71.In F.L. Knopf and F.B. Samson (eds.) Ecology and Conservation of Great Plains Vertebrates. Springer-Verlag Inc. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, J.M., W.R. Osterkamp, and W.M. Lewis. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology 77:2167–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gom, L.A. 1996. The discrimenation of cottonwood clones in a mature population along the Oldman River, Alberta. M. S. Thesis. University of Lethbridge. Lethbridge, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. London, England.Google Scholar
  15. Howe, W.H. and F.L. Knopf. 1991. On the imminent decline of Rio Grande cottonwoods in central New Mexico. Southewestern Naturalist 36:218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, F.M.R. 1994. Environmental change, disturbance and regeneration in semi-arid floodplain forests. p. 321–345.In A.C. Millington and K. Pye (eds.) Environmental Change in Drylands: Biogeographical and Geomorphological Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London, England.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, W.C. 1994. Woodland expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs 64:45–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, W.C., R.L. Burgess, and W.R. Keammerer. 1976:Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 46:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapustka, L.A. 1972. Germination and establishment ofPopulus deltoides in eastern Nebraska. M.S. Thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Kondolf, G.M., J.W. Webb, M.J. Sale, and T. Felando. 1987. Basic hydrologic studies for assessing the impacts of flow diversions on riparian vegetation: examples from streams of the eastern Sierra Nevada, California. Environmental Management 11:757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, C., J.M. Mahoney, and S.B. Rood, 1991. Poplar seeds and seedlings along the St. Mary, Belly, and Waterton rivers, Alberta. p. 85–90.In S.B. Rood and J.M. Mahoney (eds.) Proceedings of the Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods Conference. University of Lethbridge. Lethbridge AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Mahoney, J.M. 1996. How river hydrology affects the establishment and growth of riparian poplars. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1991a. A device for studying the influence of declining water table on poplar growth and survival. Tree Physiology 8:305–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1991b. A model for assessing the impact of altered river flows on riparian poplars in southwestern Alberta. p. 99–104.In S.B. Rood and J.M. Mahoney (eds.) Proceedings of the Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods Conference. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1992. Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Management 54:141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1993a. A model for assessing the effects of altered river flows on the recruitment of riparian cottonwoods. p. 228–232.In B. Tellman, H.J. Cortner, M.G. Wallace, L.F. DeBano, and R.H. Hamre. (eds.) Riparian Management: Common Threads and Shared Interests. USDA Forest Service, Albuquerque, NM, USA. General Technical Report RM-226.Google Scholar
  27. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1993b. The potential effects of an operating plan for the Oldman River Dam on riparian cottonwood forests. Oldman River Dam Mitigation Program Downstream Vegetation Project Report Volume II. Report prepared for Alberta Public Works, Supply and Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Marken, S.L. 1993. Plains cottonwoods and riparian plant communities on the lower Red Deer River. M.S. Thesis. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. McBride, J.R. and J. Strahan. 1984. Fluvial processes and woodland succession along Dry Creek. Sonoma County, California. p. 110–119.In R.E. Warner and K.M. Hendrix (eds.) Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference. University of California, Davis, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  30. McBride, J.R., N. Sugihara, and E. Norberg. 1988 Growth and survival of three riparian woodland species in relation to simulated water table dynamics. Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Noble, M.G. 1979. The origin ofPopulus deltoides andSalix interior zones on point bars along the Minnesota River. American Midland Naturalist 102:59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peterson, E.B. and N.M. Peterson. 1992. Ecology, management, and use of aspen and balsam poplar in the prairie provinces, Canada. NTIS Special Report 1 prepared for Forestry Canada Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Reed, J. 1995. Factors affecting the genetic architecture of black cottonwood populations. M.S. Thesis. University of Washington, Scattle, WA, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Reid, D.E. 1991. Cottonwoods of the Milk River. p. 35–42.In S.B. Rood and Mahoney, J.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods Conference. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  35. Reid, D.E., L. Zilm, J.M. Mahoney, and S.B. Rood. 1992. Riparian vegetation of the St. Mary, Belly and Waterton River valleys. Alberta. Report prepared for Alberta Environmental Protection, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  36. Rood, S. 1995. Cottonwoods along the Columbia River and potential impacts of river stage decline downstream from the Keenleyside Dam, British Columbia. Report prepared for Mirkwood Ecological Consultants, Castlegar, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Rood, S.B., C.E. Bradley, and K. Taboulchanas. 1998a. Instream flows and riparian vegetation along the middle Bow River, Alberta. Report prepared for Alberta Environmental Protection, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Rood, S.B., C. Hillman, T. Sanche, and J.M. Mahoney. 1994. Clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:1766–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rood, S.B., A.R. Kalischuk, T. Bond, L. Bridges, R. Cain, P. Fay, M. Heller, K. Larter, K. Mikkelborg, G. Neufeld, M.L. Polzin, C. Rogers, J. Schmaltz, C. Vair, and L. Weaver, 1997. Canyonlands cottonwoods: Mortality of Fremont cottonwoods in the Matheson Wetlands Preserve along the Colorado River at Moab, Utah. Report prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Moab, UT. USA.Google Scholar
  40. Rood, S.B., A.R. Kalischuk, and J.M. Mahoney. 1998b. Initial cottonwood seedling recruitment following the flood of the century along the Oldman River, Alberta, Canada, Wetlands 18:557–570.Google Scholar
  41. Rood, S.B. and J.M. Mahoney. 1990. Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in Western Prairies: Probable causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14: 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rood, S.B. and J.M. Mahoney. 1995. River damming and riparian cottonwoods along the Marias River, Montana. Rivers 5:195–207.Google Scholar
  43. Rood, S.B., J.M. Mahoney, D.E. Reid, and L. Zilm. 1995. Instream flows and the decline of riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:1250–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, M.L., G.T. Auble, and J.M. Friedman. 1997. Flood dependency of cottonwood establishment along the Missouri River, Montana, USA. Ecological Applications 7:677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scott, M.L., J.M. Friedman, and G.T. Auble. 1996. Fluvial process and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology 14: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott, M.L., M.A. Wondzell, and G.T. Auble. 1993. Hydrograph characteristics relevant to the establishment and growth of western riparian vegetation. p. 237–246.In H.J. Morel-Seytoux (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th Annual American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Hydrology Days Publications, Atherton, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Segelquist, C.A., M.I. Scott, and G.T. Auble. 1993. Establishment ofPopulus deltoides under simulated alluvial groundwater declines. American Midland Naturalist 130:274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shafroth, P.B., G.T. Auble, and M.L. Scott. 1995. Germination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subsp.monilifera) and the exotic Russian-olive (Eleagnus angustifolia L.). Conservation Biology 9:1169–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shafroth, P.B., G.T. Auble, J.C. Stromberg, and D.T. Patten. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River Arizona. Wetlands 18: 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stromberg, J.C., J. Fry, and D.T. Patten 1997. Marsh development after large floods in an alluvial, arid-land river. Wetlands 17:292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stromberg, J.C. and D.T. Pattern, 1991. Instream flow requirements for cottonwoods at Bishop Creek, Inyo County. California. Rivers 2:1–11.Google Scholar
  52. Stromberg, J.C., D.T. Patten, and B.D. Richter. 1991 Flood flows and dynamics of Sonoran riparian forests. Rivers 2:221–235.Google Scholar
  53. Tyree, M.T., K.J. Kolb, S.B. Rood, and S. Patino. 1994. Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation of riparian cottonwoods in Alberta: a possible factor in the decline of the ecosystem? Tree Physiology 14:455–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Virginillo, M., J.M. Mahoney, and S.B. Rood. 1991 Establishment and survival of poplar seedlings along the Oldman River, Southern Alberta. p. 55–62.In S.B. Rood and J.M. Mahoney (eds.) Proceedings of the Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods Conference. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
  55. Wallace, J.B., S.L. Eggert, J.L. Meyer, and J.R. Webster. 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ware, G. and W. Penfound. 1949. The vegetation of the lower levels of the floodplain of the South Canadian River in central Oklahoma. Ecology 30:478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Mahoney
    • 1
  • Stewart B. Rood
    • 2
  1. 1.Alberta Environmental ProtectionPincher CreekCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations