Abstract
Hydrologic and soil parameters were surveyed in three wetlands to determine the prevailing influences on vegetation distribution and composition. Five hydrologic parameters, four soil parameters, and the relative elevation of sampling plots in two restored wetlands and one reference wetland were compared. Bray-Curtis ordination techniques were used to discern correlations between the measured environmental parameters and the presence and abundance of twelve wetland plant species. Speices’ environmental preferences were then related to differences in vegetation distribution and composition between reference and restored wetlands. Data analysis revealed the strongest correlations between average water level, minimum water level, and depth of peat and the presence and abundance of the twelve wetland plant taxa. The relatively thin layer of peat found in the restored areas, and the consequent lower average and minimum water levels, was correlated with the presence and spread ofSalix spp. The thicker layer of peat found in the reference area was correlated with the greater presence of the co-dominantsCarex aquatilis andCalamagrostis canadensis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Literature Cited
Beals, E. W. 1984. Bray-Curtis ordination: An effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research 14:1–55.
Bridgham S. D. and C. J. Richardson. 1993. Hydrology and Nutrient Gradients in North Carolina Peatlands. Wetlands 13:207–218.
Curtis, J. T. and R. P. McIntosh. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476–96.
Day, E. 1986. Mitigation for the South Madison Beltline Dane Country, Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Madison, WI, USA.
Eggars, S. D. and D. M. Reed. 1987. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Elias, T. S. 1980. The Complete Trees of N. America Field Guide and Natural History. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York, NY, USA.
Garwood, A. N. 1996. Weather America. Toucan Vailey Publications, Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Grace, J. B. and R. G. Wetzel 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha): Experimental field studies. The American Naturalist 118:463–474.
Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. University of California Press, Davis, CA, USA.
Harris, S. W. and W. H. Marshall. 1963. Ecology of water-level manipulations on a northern marsh. Ecology 44:331–343.
Kadlec, J. A. 1962. Effects of a drawdown on a waterfowl impoundment. Ecology 43:267–281.
McCune, B. 1987. Multivariate Analysis on the PC-ORD System. A Software Documentation Report. Butler University. Indianapolis, IN, USA. HRI Report No. 75.
Meeks, R. 1969. The effect of drawdown date on wetland plant succession. Journal of Wildlife Management 33:817–821.
Millar, J. B. 1973. Vegetation changes in shallow marsh wetlands under improving moisture regime. Canadian Journal of Botany 51:1443–1457.
Nelson, D. W. and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 539–579.In A. L. Page (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties-Agronomy Monograph no. 9. Madison, WI, USA.
Ovendum, L., and G. R. Brassard. 1989. Wetland vegetation near Old Crow, northern Yukon. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:954–960.
Owen C. R., Q. J. Carpenter, and C. B. DeWitt. 1989. Evaluation of Three Wetland Restorations Associated with Highway Projects. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, WI, USA.
Owen, C. R.. 1995. Water budget and flow patterns in an urban wetland. Journal of Hydrology 169:171–187.
Ruffner, J. A.. 1978. Climates of the States. Gale Research Company, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sculthorpe, C. D.. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold Ltd., London, England.
Shay, J. M., and C. T. Shay. 1986. Prairie marshes in western Canada, with specific references to the ecology of five emergent macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:443–454.
Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.
Vivian-Smith, G., and S. N. Handel. 1996. Freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine: seed bank recruitment dynamics and plant colonization. Wetlands 16:185–196.
Walker, B. H., and R. T. Coupland. 1968. An analysis of vegetation-environment relationships in Saskatchewan sloughs. Canadian Journal of Botany 46:509–522.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashworth, S.M. Comparison between restored and reference sedge meadow wetlands in south-central wisconsin. Wetlands 17, 518–527 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161518
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161518
Key Words
- wetland
- sedge meadow
- Wisconsin
- restoration
- salvaged marsh surface