Skip to main content
Log in

The primary indicators method—A practical approach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, various methods have been developed to identify and delineate wetlands for regulatory purposes in the United States. This paper discusses major limitations of existing methods and offers an alternative method called the “primary indicators method.” This new method is based on using features (national and regional plant and soil characteristics) unique to wetlands for identifying wetlands and their boundaries. These primary indicators permit accurate wetland determinations and delineations in the absence of significant hydrologic modification because these features only develop in wetlands. Wetlands subject to significant drainage require an assessment of the current hydrology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Allen, D.S., F.C. Golet, A.F. Davis, and T.E. Sokolosky. 1989. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in Transition Zones of Rhode Island Red Maple Swamps. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 89 (9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baad, M.F.. 1988. Soil-Vegetation Correlations within the Riparian Zone of Butte Sink in the Sacramento Valley of Northern California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 88 (25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, G.R., D. Segal, and C. Wolfe. 1990. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in Selected Wetlands and uplands of North-Central Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, Biol. Rep. 90(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N.L., R.B. Burchell, A. Liggett, and E.L. Simms. 1981. The structure and development of pocosin vegetation. p. 43–61.In C.J. Richardson (ed.) Pocesin Wetlands. Hutchinsin Ross Publishing Company, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N.L., R.B. Wilbur, and J.S. McLean. 1988. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in the Pocosins of Croatan National Forest. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. USA, Biol. Rpt. 88(28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, H., 1988. A Focus on Featlands and Peat Mosses. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damman, A.W.H. and T.W. French. 1987. The Ecology of Peat Bogs of the Glaciated Northeastern United States: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rep. 85(7.16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick-Peddie, W.A., J.V. Hardesty, E. Muldavin, and B. Sallach. 1987. Soil-Vegetation Correlations on the Ripariar Zones of the Gila and San Francisco Rivers in New Mexico. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA, Biol. Rpt. 87(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPinto, M.A. and R. McCollum. 1988. Guide to Inland Vegetated Wetlands in Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Wetlands and Waterways. Boston. MA. USA. Pub. No. 15, 190-84-1,000-88. C.R.

  • Duever, M.J., J.E. Carlson, and L.A. Riopelle. 1984. Corkscrew Swamp: a virgin cypress strand. p. 334–348.In K.C. Ewel and H.T. Odum (eds.) Cypress Swamps. University of Florida Press. Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, A.L.. 1988. Soil-Plant Correlations in Wetlands and Adjacent Uplands of the San Francisco Bay Estuary California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 88(21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Defense Fund and World Wildlife Fund. 1992. How Wet Is a Wetland? The Impacts of the Proposed Revisions to the Federa: Wetlands Delineation Manual Washington, DC, USA.

  • Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg. MS, USA. Tech. Rpt. Y-87-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M.E. and D.M. Leslie, Jr. 1987. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in the Sandhils and Rainwater Basin Wetlands of Nebraska. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 87(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, N.D. and D.M. Leslie. 1989. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in Coastal Mississippi Wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 89(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D.D. and A.D. Scott. 1955. A polarographic method of measuring dissolved oxygen in saturated soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 19: 12–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, P.M., E. Keller, A. Sands, and B.M. Massey. 1989. The Ecology of Riparian Habitats of the Southern California Coastal Region: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rep (7.27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freehling, M.D.. 1982. Riparian Woodland of the Middle Rio Grande Valley, Mexico: A Study of Bird Populations and Vegetation with Spanish Reference to Russian Olive (Elceagnus angustifolia). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell, R.P. and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1978. Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments.In D.D. Hook and R.M.M. Crawford (eds.) Plant Life In Anaerobic Environments. Ann Arbor Science Publications, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, P.H.. 1987. The Ecology of Patterned Boreal Peatlands of Northern Minnesota: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rep. 85(7.14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golet, F.C. and J.S. Larson. 1974. Classification of freshwater wetlands in the glaciated Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Resour. Publ. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdendorf, C.S., S.M. Hartley, and M.D. Barnes (eds.), 1981. Fish and Wildlife Resources of the Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Within the United States. Volume One: Overview. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D.W., J.B. Millar, D.D. Malo, and K.F. Higgins. 1988. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in Prairie Potholes of Beadle and Dauel Counties, South Dakota. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 88(22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H.A., J.B. Millar, and A.G., van der Valk. 1989. Vegetation of wetlands of the prairie pothole region. Chapter 5. p. 132–187.In A.G. van der Valk (ed.), Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderman, A.D. (ed.). 1987. Atlantic White Cedar Wetlands. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefor, M.W. and R.W. Tiner. 1972. Tidal wetlands survey of the State of Connecticut. Report of the Consultant Biologists for the period December 22, 1969 to June 30. 1972. Biological Sciences Group, University of Connecticut. Storrs, CT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefor, M.W. and R.W. Tiner. 1974. Tidal wetlands survey of the State of Connecticut. Report of the Consultant Biologists for the period August 1, 1972–December 31, 1973. Biological Sciences Group, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader, S.F. 1991. Forested Wetlands Classification, and Mapping: A Literature Review. National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., New York, NY, USA. Technical Bulletin No 606.

  • Metzler, K.J. and R.W. Tiner. 1992. Wetlands of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, Harford, CT, USA, Report of Investigations No. 13.

  • Minshall, G.W., S.E. Jenson, and W.S. Platts. 1989. The Ecology of Stream and Riparian Habitats of the Great Basin Region: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA Biol. Rep. 85(7.24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1986. Wetlands. Var. Nostrand Reinhold Co., Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachlinger J.L.. 1988. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in Riparian and Emergent Wetlans, Lyon County, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 88(17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.W., W.J. Logan, and E.C. Weller. 1983. Playa Wetlands and Wildlife on the Southern Great Plains: A Characterization of Habitat. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-83/28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmart, R.D., B.W. Anderson, and W.C. Hunter. 1988. The Ecology of the lower Colorado River from Davis Dam to the MexicoUnited States International Boundary: A Community Profile, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rep. 85(7.19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma, F.N.. 1972. The chemistry of submerged soils. Advances in Agronomy 24: 29–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: National Summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA, Biol Rpt. 88(24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.L., W.L. Slauson, C.A. Segelquist, and G.T. Auble. 1989. Correspondence between vegetation and soils in wetlands and nearby uplands. Wetlands 9: 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segelquist, C.A., W.L. Slauson, M.L. Scott, and G.T. Auble. 1990. Synthesis of Soil-Plant Correspondence Data from Twelve Wetland Studies throughout the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 90(19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipple, W.S.. 1985. Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Federal Activities, Washington, DC, USA. Draft Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipple, W.S.. 1988. Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. Volume I. Rationale, Wetland Parameters, and Overview of Jurisdictional Approach. Volumn II. Field Methodology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands Protection, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipple, W.S., 1992. Time to move on. National Wetlands Newsletter 14:4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoropanov, S.G.. 1961. Reclamation and Cultivation, of Peat-bog Soils. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. (Translated from Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1975. Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification and for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA. Agriculture Handbook No. 436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1990. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Agency for International Development and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Management Support Staff Technical Monograph No. 19, 4th edition. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroka, E.E., 1975. A vegetation survey on cross-sectional transects in Austin Cary Forest cypres dome.In Cypress Wetlands for Water Management, Recycling and Conservation. Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, Gainesvilled, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.E. and H.A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairic region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA. Resour. Publ. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985a. Wetlands of New Jersey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Newton Comer, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985b. Wetlands of Delaware U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, DE, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1987. A Field Guide to Coastal Wetland Plants of the Northeatern United States. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1988. Field Guide to Nontidal Wetland Identification. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Annapolis, MD, USA and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton, Corner, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1989a. Wetland boundary delineation. p. 231–248.In S.K. Majumdar, R.P. Brooks, F.J. Brenner, and R.W. Tiner, Jr. (eds.) Wetlands Ecology and Conservation: Emphasis in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences. Easton, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W.. 1989b. Wetlands of Rhode Island. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Comer, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1991a. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. BioScience 41. 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1991b. How wet is a wetland? Great Lakes Wetlands Newsletter 2(3): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1991c. Wetland delineation 1991.In G. Aron and E.L. White (eds.) Proceedings of the 1991 Stormwater Management/Wetlands/Floodplain Symposium (September 23–24 1991). The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Civil Engineering. University Park, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W.. 1993. Field Guide to Coastal Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. and P.L.M. Veneman. 1987. Hydrie Soils of New England. University of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension Service, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F.T. and W.H. Patrick. 1968. Chemical changes in waterlogged soils as a result of oxygen depletion. 9th Transactions of the International Congress on Soil Science 4: 53–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 1962. Supplement to Agriculture Handbook No. 18 Soil Survey Manual (replacing pages 173–188). Washington, DC, USA.

  • U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. Washington, DC, USA. Misc. Publication No. 1491.

  • Veneman, P.L.M. and R.W. Tiner. 1990. Soil-Vegetation Correlations in the Connecticut River Floodplain of Western Massachusetts. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rpt. 90(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C.H., W.M. Kitchens, E.C. Pendleton, and T.W. Sipe. 1982. The Ecology of Bottomland Hardwood Swamps of the Southeast: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D.L., K. Schneller-McDonald, R.W. Olson, and G.T. Auble. 1987. Synopsis of Wetland Functions and Values: Bottomland Hardwoods with Special Emphasis on Eastern Texas and Oklahoma. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biol. Rep. 87(12).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiner, R.W. The primary indicators method—A practical approach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States. Wetlands 13, 50–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160865

Key Words

Navigation