Abstract
Yearly above-ground production estimates in natural, ditched, and impounded high salt marshes along the Indian River Lagoon in east central Florida ranged from 834.9 g/m2 in the impounded marsh to 2.316.5 g/m2 in the natural one. Mosquito control activities in the impounded marsh prior to the start of this study resulted in larger stocks of dead and litter biomass there during the first year than at the other two marshes. High soil temperature and salinity during the summer may have caused a decrease in production during that season. Annual tumover rales varied from 5.8 at the impounded marsh during the first year to 1.1 at the impounded marsh and at a nearby ditched marsh during the second year. Prduction was inversely correlated with flooding frequency. No significant differences were found in the rates of litter loss from any of the sites, but litter from the impounded marsh had greater organic content than litter from the open and the ditched marshes. The data suggest that flooding for mosquito control during the summer can curtail production, but the effects upon yearly production are minor, as production during the summer is naturally low.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Antlfinger, A.E. and E.L. Dunn. 1979. Seasonal pattems of CO2 and water vapor exchange in three salt marsh succulents. Oecologia 43: 249–260.
Bradley, P.M. and E.L. Dunn. 1989. Effects of sulfide on the growth of thre salt marsh halophytes of the soueasterm United States. American Journal of Botany 76: 1707–1713.
Brenner, D.I., I. Valiela, C.D. van Raalte, and E.J. Carpenter, 1976. Grazing byTalorchestialongicornis on an algal mat in a New England salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 22: 161–170.
Binet, P. 1965. Etudes d’ecologie experimentale etphysiologique surCochlearia anglica L. Oecologia Plantarum 1:7–38.
Bradshaw, J.S. 1968. Environmental parameters and marsh Foraminifera. Limnology and Oceanography 13: 26–38.
Carlson. P.R., L.A. Yabro, C.F. Zimmerman, and J.R. Montgomery. 1983. Pore water chemisty of an overwash mangrove island. Florida Scientist 46: 239–249.
de la Cruz, A.A. 1973. The role of tidal marshes in the productivity of coastal waters. Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 20: 147–156.
DeLaune, R.D., C.I. Smith, and W.H. Patrick. 1983. Relationships of marsh elevation, redox potential, and sulfide toSpartina alterniflora productivity. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 47: 930–935.
Eilers, H.P. 1981. Production in coastal salt marshes in southern California. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Report EPA-60013-81-023. NTIS, Washington, DC, USA.
Ferren, W.R. 1985. Carpinteria salt marsh: Environment, history, and botanical resources of a southern Califormia estuary. The Herbarium (Univ. of Califormia, Santa Barbara) 4: 108–120.
Hackney, C.T. 1987. Factors affecting accumulation or loss of macroorganic matter in salt marsh sediments. Ecology 68: 1109–1113.
Haines, E.B. and R.B. Hanson. 1979. Experimental degradationm of detritus made from the salt marsh plantsSpartina alterniflora Loisel.,Salicornia virginica L., andJuncus roemerianus Scheele. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 40: 27–40.
Hopkinson, C.S., J.G. Gosselink, and R.T. Parrondo. 1978. Aboveground production of seven marsh plant species in coastal Lousiana. Ecology 59: 760–769.
Howarth, R.W. and J.E. Hebbie. 1982. The reggulation of decomposition and heterotrophic microbial activity in salt marsh soils: A review. p. 183–206.In V.S. Kennedy (ed.) Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, NY, USA.
Jervis, R.A. 1964. Primary production in a freshwater marsh ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Keefe, C.W. 1972. Marsh production: A summary of the literature. Contributions to Marine Science 16: 163–181.
King, G.M., M.J. Klug, R.G. Wiegert, and A.G. Chalmers. 1982. Relation of soil water movement and sulfide concentration toSpatina alteriniflora productivity in a Georgia salt marsh. Science 218: 61–63.
Kirby, C.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1976. Primary production in a Louisiana Gulf CoastSparitna alterniflora marsh. Ecology 57: 1052–1059.
Langlois, J. 1971. Influence du rythme dimmersion sur la croissance et la metabolisma proteique deSalicornia stricta Dumort. Oecologia Plantarum 6:227–245.
Langlois, J. and I.A. Ungar. 1976. A comparison of the effect off artificial tidal action on the growth and protein nitrogen content ofSalicornia stricta Dumort andSalicornia ramossisima Woods. Aquatic Biology 2: 43–50.
Linthurst, R.A. and R.J. Reimold. 1978. An evaluation of methods forestimating the net aerial primary productivity of estuarine angiosperms. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 919–931.
McIntyre, W.R. 1977. The biotic and physical effects of trampling salt marsh(Salicornia virginica L.). M.S. Thesis. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. (in Zedler 1982).
Mendelssohn, I.A. and K.L. Marcellus. 1978. Angiosperm production of three Virginia marshes in various salinity and soil nutrient regimes. Chesapeake Science 17: 15–23.
Morgan, M.H. 1961. Annual angiosperm production on a salt marsh. M.S. Thesis. University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Odum, E.P., J.B. Birch, and J.I. Cooley. 1983. Comparison of giant outgrass productivity in tidal and impounded marshes with special reference to tidal subsidy and waste assimilation. Estuaries 6: 88–94.
Onuf, C.P. 1987. The ecology of Mugu Lagoon, California: an Estuarine Profile. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 85 (7.15). Washington, DC, USA.
Onuf, C.P., M.L. Quammen, G.P. Shaffer, C.H. Peterson, J.W. Chapman, J. Cermak, and R.W. Holmes. 1978. An analysis of the values of central and southem California coastal wetlands. p. 189–199.In P. W. Greeson, J.R. Clark, and J.E. Clark (eds.) Wetlands Functions and Values: the State of our Understanding. American Water Resources Association, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Provost, M.W. 1973. Mean high water mark and use of tidelands in Florida. Florida Scientist 36: 50–66.
Rey, J.R., R.A. Crossman, and T.R. Kain. 1990. Vegetation dynamics in impounded marshes along the Indian River Lagoon-Florida, U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Management, 14: 397–409.
Ruber, E. and R.E. Murray. 1978. Some ideas about coastal management: from production and export studies on a Massachusetts salt marsh. Proceedings New Jersey Mosquito Control Association 65: 51–58.
Shew, D.M., R.A. Linthurst, and E.D. Seneca. 1981. Comparison of production computation methods in a southcastem North CarolinaSpatina alterniflora salt marsh. Estuaries 4: 97–109.
Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Steever, E.Z., R.S. Warren, and W.A. Niering. 1976. Tidal energy subsidy and standing crop production ofSpartina alterniflora. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 4: 473–478.
Stroud, L.M. and A.W. Cooper. 1969. Color infrared aerial photographic interpretation and net primary productivity of a regularly-flooded North Carolina salt marsh. University of North Carolina Water Resources Institute Report #14.
Turner, R.E. 1976. Geographic variation in salt marsh macrophyte prodation: A review. Contributions to Marine Science 20: 47–68.
White, D.A. and J.M. Trapani. 1982. Factors influencing the disappearance ofSpartina alterniflora from litter bags. Ecology 63: 242–245.
White, D.A., T.E. Weiss, J.M. Trapani, and L.B. Thien. 1978. Productivity and decomposition of the dominant saltmarsh plants in Louisiana. Ecology 59: 751–759.
Wiebe, P.O. 1935. A quantitative study of the influence of tide upon populations ofSalicornia europaea. Journal of Ecology 23: 323–333.
Wiegert, R. and F. Evans. 1964. Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation from an old field. Ecology 45: 49–63.
Williams, P. 1979. Detritus utilization byMytilus edulis. M.S. Thesis. San Diego State University. San Diego, CA. USA.
Winfield, T.P. 1980. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in a Southem California salt marsh. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California. Riverside, CA, USA.
Zedler, J.B. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/54.
Zedler, J.B., T.P. Winfield, and P. Williams. 1980. Salt marsh productivity with natural and altered tidal circulation. Oecologia 44: 236–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rey, J.R., Shaffer, J., Crossman, R. et al. Above-ground primary production in impounded, ditched, and naturalBatis-salicornia marshes along the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, U.S.A.. Wetlands 10, 151–171 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160830
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160830