Skip to main content
Log in

Wet soils in the North Carolina lower Coastal Plain

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mostsoils in the lower Coastal Plain are potentially “wet.” However, the wettest soils are usually those that are either next to major streams and estuaries or are on the interstream divides and broad flats. The soils next to streams are usually wet from water coming from higher elevations, and the soils on the interstream divides are wet because both surface and subsurface drainage is restricted. The largest areas of very poorly drained soils are those on the interstream divides. The degree of wetness is the main factor determining the characteristics of the soils found at a particular location. Deep organics (Typic Medisaprists) are located on sites that have historically been the wettest. As the soils became progressively drier, shallow organic soils (Terric Medisaprists), mineral soils with a Histic epipedon (organic surface) and mineral soils are found. The location and type of soil are both important factors influencing value of the land for development purposes and for water quality preservation. The poorly drained soils immediately adjacent to streams or estuaries are much more valuable for water quality purposes than those located some distance from important water bodies. Organic soils have the greatest potential for denitrification but very low capacity for phosphorus sorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Badr, Abdel-Wahed. 1978. The effect of land development on the physical properties of some North Carolina organic soils. Paper No. 78-2537. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL, USA.

  • Bremner, J. M. and K. Shaw. 1958. Denitrification in soil. II. Factors affecting denitrification. Journal of Agricultural Science 51:40–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chescheir, G. M., J. W. Gilliam, R. W. Skaggs, and R. G. Broadhead. 1987. The hydrology and pollutant removal effectiveness of wetland buffer areas receiving pumped agricultural drainage water. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina Report No. 231.

  • Cooper, J. R. and J. W. Gilliam. 1987. Phosphorus redistribution from cultivated fields into riparian areas. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51:1600–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. R., J. W. Gilliam, R. B. Daniels, and W. P. Robarge. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51:416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R. B., E. E. Gamble, and W. H. Wheeler. 1977. The stratigraphy and geomorphology of the Hofmann Forest Pocosin. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41:1175–1180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R. B., E. E. Gamble, and W. H. Wheeler, 1978. Age of soil landscapes in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R. B., H. J. Kleiss, S. W. Buol, H. J. Byrd, and J. A. Phillips. 1984. Soil Systems in North Carolina. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 467.

  • Fox, R. L. and E. J. Kamprath. 1971. Adsorption and leaching of P in acid organic soils and high organic matter soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35:154–156.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, T.J. and J.W. Gilliam. 1985. Riparianlosses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality 14:472–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J. P. 1981a. The Blackland Soils of North Carolina. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 270.

  • Lilly, J. P. 1981b. A history of swamp land development in North Carolina. p. 20–42.In C. J. Richardson (ed.) Pocosin Wetlands: an Integrated Analysis of Coastal Plain Freshwater Wetlands in North Carolina. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stroudburg, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R. R., R. L. Todd, and L. E. Asmussen. 1984. Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed. I. Phreatic movement. Journal of Environmental Quality 13:22–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., R. Todd, J. Fail, O. Hendrickson, R. Leonard, and L. Asmussen. 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34:374–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oats, R. Q. and N. K. Coch. 1973. Post-Miocene stratigraphy and morphology, southeastern Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Bulletin 82.

  • Peterjohn, W. T. and D. L. Correll. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, R. W., J. W. Gilliam, T. J. Sheets, and J. S. Barnes. 1980. Effect of agriculturalland development on drainage waters in the North Carolina Tidewater Region. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina Report No. 159.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilliam, J.W. Wet soils in the North Carolina lower Coastal Plain. Wetlands 11 (Suppl 1), 391–398 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160758

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160758

Key words

Navigation