Functional analysis of a two-year-old created in-stream wetland: Hydrology, phosphorus retention, and vegetation survival and growth

Abstract

Planted vegetation survival and growth, hydrology, and phosphorus dynamics were monitored for the first two years of wetland development at a 6-ha created riparian wetland, in Franklin County, Ohio, USA. Herbaceous vegetation developed clear zonation and appeared to reduce the invasion ofTypha spp. Of the 17 species introduced, 8 were among the 18 most commonly encountered species approximately 2 years after the wetland was constructed. Planted saplings generally survived except where they were found in standing water;Liquidambar styraciflua andBetula nigra were less successful because the site is close to their northern range. Simulation models were developed to predict hydrology, phosphorus retention, and tree growth. The site has a rapidly pulsing hydroperiod driven by runoff from storm events. Annual simulated phosphorus loading was 17.8 gP m−2 yr−1 and retention was 2.9 gP m−2 yr−1 (16% of inflow). Fifty years of tree growth simulated for each planted tree species indicated that the site will develop into a forested wetland dominated byQuercus palustris andFraxinus pennsylvanica with basal area comparable to riparian forests but with lower stem density unless seedlings germinate from the planted trees. Lower water levels in the wetland would favor the development of the woody vegetation over herbaceous vegetation and would also favor higher retention of phosphorus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  1. American Public Health Association. 1989. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and the Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, R. B., J. E. Perry, E. Smith, and J. Cairns, Jr. 1993. Use of created wetlands delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellport, B. P., and G. E. Burnett (eds.) 1984. Water Measurement Manual, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botkin, D. B. 1993. Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model. Oxford University Press. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brix, H. 1994. Constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in Europe. p. 325–333.In W. J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chow, V. T. (ed.). 1964. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craft, C. B. and C. J. Richardson. 1993 Peat accretion and N, P, and organic C accumulation in nutrient-enriched and unenriched Everglades peatlands. Ecological Applications 3:446–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erwin, K. A. 1991. An evaluation of wetland mitigation in the South Florida Water Management District, Vol. 1, Final Report to South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.

  9. Ewel, K. C. and H. T. Odum (eds.). 1984. Cypress Swamps. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fennessy, M. S. and W. J. Mitsch. 1989. Treating coal mine drainage with an artificial wetland. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 61:1691–1701.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammer, D. A. (ed.). 1989. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hey, D. L., M. A. Cardamone, J. H. Sather, and W. J. Mitsch. 1989. Restoration of riverine wetlands: the Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project. p. 159–184. In: W. J. Mitsch and S. E. Jørgensen (eds.) Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jarman, N. M., R. A. Doberteen, B. Windmiller, and P. R. Lelito. 1991. Evaluation of created freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. Restoration and Management Notes 9:26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jørgensen, S. E. 1986. Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kadlec, R. H. 1994. Wetlands for water polishing: free water surface wetlands. p. 335–349.In W. J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kadlec, R. H. and J. A. Kadlec. 1979. Wetlands and water quality. p. 436–456.In: P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, and J. E. Clark (eds.) Wetland Functions and Values: The State of Our Understanding. American Water Resources Association, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1992. Wetlands: An Approach to Improving Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knight, R. L. 1990. Wetland Systems p. 211–260.In Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment, Manual of Practice FD-16. Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kusler, J. and M. E. Kentula. 1990. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kusler, J., W. J. Mitsch, and J. S. Larson. 1994. Wetlands. Scientific American 270:64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitsch, W. J. 1992. Landscape design and the role of created, restored, and natural riparian wetlands in controlling nonpoint source pollution. Ecological Engineering 1:27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitsch, W. J., and B. C. Reeder. 1991. Modelling nutrient retention of a freshwater coastal wetland: estimating the roles of primary productivity, sedimentation, resuspension, and hydrology. Ecological Modelling 54:151–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitsch, W. J. and J. K. Cronk. 1992. Creation and restoration of wetlands: some design consideration for ecological engineering. p. 217–259.In: R. Lal and B. A. Stewart (eds.) Advances In Soil Science, Vol. 17. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands 2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mitsch, W. J. and X. Wu. 1995. Olentangy River Wetland Research Park at The Ohio State University: Annual Report 1994. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitsch, W. J. J. K. Cronk, W. Wu, R. W. Nairn, and D. L. Hey. 1995. Phosphorus retention in constructed freshwater riparian marshes. Ecological Applications. in press.

  27. Mitsch, W. J. and R. F. Wilson. in press. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications.

  28. Odum, H.T.. 1983. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Odum, H. T., K. C. Ewel, W. J. Mitsch, and J. W. Ordway. 1977. Recycling treated sewage through cypress wetlands in Florida. p. 35–67.In F. M. D’Itri (ed.) Wastewater Renovation and Reuse. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pearlstine, L., H. McKellar, and W. Kitchens. 1985. Modelling the impacts of a river diversion on bottomland forest communities in the Santee River floodplain South Carolina. Ecological Modelling 29:281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Petrides, G. A. 1988. Eastern Trees. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Phipps, R. L. 1979. Simulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 29:257–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, Biological Report 88 (26.1).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne. 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeast Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richmond, B., S. Peterson, and P. Vescuso. 1987. An Academic User’s Guide to STELLA. High Performance Systems, Lyme, NH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ruffner, J. A. and F. E. Bair (eds.). 1987. The Weather Almanac, Gale Research Company Book Tower, Detroit, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sanville, W. and W. J. Mitsch (eds.). 1994. Creating Freshwater Marshes in a Riparian Landscape: Research at the Des Plaines River Wetland Demonstration Project. Ecological Engineering 3:315–521.

  38. Sargent, C. S. 1933. Manual of the Trees of North America. The Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sifneos, J. C., E. W. Cake, Jr. and M. E. Kentula. 1992. Effects of Section 404 permitting on freshwater wetlands in Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi. Wetlands 12:28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Hydric Soils of the United States. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weider, R. K. 1989. A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in Eastern United States. Wetlands 9:299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wentworth, T. R., G. P. Johnson, and R. L. Kologiski. 1988. Designation of wetlands by weighted averages of vegetation data: A preliminary evaluation. Water Resources Bulletin 24:389–396.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Mitsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niswander, S.F., Mitsch, W.J. Functional analysis of a two-year-old created in-stream wetland: Hydrology, phosphorus retention, and vegetation survival and growth. Wetlands 15, 212–225 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160701

Download citation

Key Words

  • phosphorus
  • in-stream wetland
  • mitigation
  • wetland creation
  • freshwater marsh
  • hydrology
  • forested wetland
  • tree survival
  • ecological model
  • wetland model
  • Ohio