, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 212–225 | Cite as

Functional analysis of a two-year-old created in-stream wetland: Hydrology, phosphorus retention, and vegetation survival and growth

  • Steven F. Niswander
  • William J. Mitsch


Planted vegetation survival and growth, hydrology, and phosphorus dynamics were monitored for the first two years of wetland development at a 6-ha created riparian wetland, in Franklin County, Ohio, USA. Herbaceous vegetation developed clear zonation and appeared to reduce the invasion ofTypha spp. Of the 17 species introduced, 8 were among the 18 most commonly encountered species approximately 2 years after the wetland was constructed. Planted saplings generally survived except where they were found in standing water;Liquidambar styraciflua andBetula nigra were less successful because the site is close to their northern range. Simulation models were developed to predict hydrology, phosphorus retention, and tree growth. The site has a rapidly pulsing hydroperiod driven by runoff from storm events. Annual simulated phosphorus loading was 17.8 gP m−2 yr−1 and retention was 2.9 gP m−2 yr−1 (16% of inflow). Fifty years of tree growth simulated for each planted tree species indicated that the site will develop into a forested wetland dominated byQuercus palustris andFraxinus pennsylvanica with basal area comparable to riparian forests but with lower stem density unless seedlings germinate from the planted trees. Lower water levels in the wetland would favor the development of the woody vegetation over herbaceous vegetation and would also favor higher retention of phosphorus.

Key Words

phosphorus in-stream wetland mitigation wetland creation freshwater marsh hydrology forested wetland tree survival ecological model wetland model Ohio 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. American Public Health Association. 1989. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and the Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. B., J. E. Perry, E. Smith, and J. Cairns, Jr. 1993. Use of created wetlands delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193.Google Scholar
  3. Bellport, B. P., and G. E. Burnett (eds.) 1984. Water Measurement Manual, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Denver, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, D. B. 1993. Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model. Oxford University Press. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Brix, H. 1994. Constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in Europe. p. 325–333.In W. J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Chow, V. T. (ed.). 1964. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Craft, C. B. and C. J. Richardson. 1993 Peat accretion and N, P, and organic C accumulation in nutrient-enriched and unenriched Everglades peatlands. Ecological Applications 3:446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin, K. A. 1991. An evaluation of wetland mitigation in the South Florida Water Management District, Vol. 1, Final Report to South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Ewel, K. C. and H. T. Odum (eds.). 1984. Cypress Swamps. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Fennessy, M. S. and W. J. Mitsch. 1989. Treating coal mine drainage with an artificial wetland. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 61:1691–1701.Google Scholar
  11. Hammer, D. A. (ed.). 1989. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Hey, D. L., M. A. Cardamone, J. H. Sather, and W. J. Mitsch. 1989. Restoration of riverine wetlands: the Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project. p. 159–184. In: W. J. Mitsch and S. E. Jørgensen (eds.) Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Jarman, N. M., R. A. Doberteen, B. Windmiller, and P. R. Lelito. 1991. Evaluation of created freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. Restoration and Management Notes 9:26–29.Google Scholar
  14. Jørgensen, S. E. 1986. Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Kadlec, R. H. 1994. Wetlands for water polishing: free water surface wetlands. p. 335–349.In W. J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. Kadlec, R. H. and J. A. Kadlec. 1979. Wetlands and water quality. p. 436–456.In: P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, and J. E. Clark (eds.) Wetland Functions and Values: The State of Our Understanding. American Water Resources Association, Minneapolis, MN, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1992. Wetlands: An Approach to Improving Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, R. L. 1990. Wetland Systems p. 211–260.In Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment, Manual of Practice FD-16. Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Kusler, J. and M. E. Kentula. 1990. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Kusler, J., W. J. Mitsch, and J. S. Larson. 1994. Wetlands. Scientific American 270:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitsch, W. J. 1992. Landscape design and the role of created, restored, and natural riparian wetlands in controlling nonpoint source pollution. Ecological Engineering 1:27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitsch, W. J., and B. C. Reeder. 1991. Modelling nutrient retention of a freshwater coastal wetland: estimating the roles of primary productivity, sedimentation, resuspension, and hydrology. Ecological Modelling 54:151–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitsch, W. J. and J. K. Cronk. 1992. Creation and restoration of wetlands: some design consideration for ecological engineering. p. 217–259.In: R. Lal and B. A. Stewart (eds.) Advances In Soil Science, Vol. 17. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands 2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Mitsch, W. J. and X. Wu. 1995. Olentangy River Wetland Research Park at The Ohio State University: Annual Report 1994. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Mitsch, W. J. J. K. Cronk, W. Wu, R. W. Nairn, and D. L. Hey. 1995. Phosphorus retention in constructed freshwater riparian marshes. Ecological Applications. in press.Google Scholar
  27. Mitsch, W. J. and R. F. Wilson. in press. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications.Google Scholar
  28. Odum, H.T.. 1983. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Odum, H. T., K. C. Ewel, W. J. Mitsch, and J. W. Ordway. 1977. Recycling treated sewage through cypress wetlands in Florida. p. 35–67.In F. M. D’Itri (ed.) Wastewater Renovation and Reuse. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Pearlstine, L., H. McKellar, and W. Kitchens. 1985. Modelling the impacts of a river diversion on bottomland forest communities in the Santee River floodplain South Carolina. Ecological Modelling 29:281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petrides, G. A. 1988. Eastern Trees. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Phipps, R. L. 1979. Simulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 29:257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, Biological Report 88 (26.1).Google Scholar
  34. Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne. 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeast Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.Google Scholar
  35. Richmond, B., S. Peterson, and P. Vescuso. 1987. An Academic User’s Guide to STELLA. High Performance Systems, Lyme, NH, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Ruffner, J. A. and F. E. Bair (eds.). 1987. The Weather Almanac, Gale Research Company Book Tower, Detroit, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Sanville, W. and W. J. Mitsch (eds.). 1994. Creating Freshwater Marshes in a Riparian Landscape: Research at the Des Plaines River Wetland Demonstration Project. Ecological Engineering 3:315–521.Google Scholar
  38. Sargent, C. S. 1933. Manual of the Trees of North America. The Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Sifneos, J. C., E. W. Cake, Jr. and M. E. Kentula. 1992. Effects of Section 404 permitting on freshwater wetlands in Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi. Wetlands 12:28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Hydric Soils of the United States. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Weider, R. K. 1989. A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in Eastern United States. Wetlands 9:299–315.Google Scholar
  42. Wentworth, T. R., G. P. Johnson, and R. L. Kologiski. 1988. Designation of wetlands by weighted averages of vegetation data: A preliminary evaluation. Water Resources Bulletin 24:389–396.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven F. Niswander
    • 1
  • William J. Mitsch
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Natural ResourcesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations