Abstract
We examined plant recruitment from two soil seed banks used in the freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine in South Brunswick, New Jersey. One seed bank was already present at the mine prior to restoration; the other was imported from a nearby wetland to be destroyed by road development. We also investigated the effects of pH and water regime on recruitment in a greenhouse study and assessed plant recruitment at the restoration site during the first growing season. Multivariate analysis of recruitment in greenhouse communities revealed differential responses of the two seed banks to pH and water regime treatments. In the wetland soil, species richness and plant density responded favorably to inundation and increased pH treatments. In the mine soil, species richness and density were greatest with non-inundated and unadjusted pH conditions. The imported seed bank was characterized by greater species richness (n=21) than the mine seed bank (n=14). Mean recruit density was also greater in the wetland soil (263.6 individuals/m2) than the mine soil (60.1 individuals/m2). Recruits unique to the imported wetland seed bank included a significant proportion of obligate wetland species (52.4%). More species were censused in the field study (82) compared to the greenhouse study (24), with 23.2% of species present in both studies. A lower proportion of obligate wetland species (24.0%) was present in the field. The imported wetland seed bank was the major contributor to species richness and plant density, indicating that the use of imported soils as an amendment may enhance success of wetland restoration projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Alford, R. A. and H. M. Wilbur. 1985. Priority effects in experimental pond communities: competition betweenBufo andRana. Ecology 66:1097–1105.
Brown, M. T. and H. T. Odum. 1985. Studies of a method of wetland reconstruction following phosphatc mining. Florida Institute of Phosphate Research. Bartow. FL, USA. Publication Number 03-022-032.
Confer, S. R. and W. A. Niering. 1992. Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA). Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:143–156.
Cook, R. 1980. The biology of seeds in the soil. p. 107–129.In O. T. Solbrig (ed.) Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Cooke, J. C. and M. W. Lefor. 1990. Comparison of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plants from disturbed and adjacent undisturbed regions of a coastal salt marsh in Clinton, Connecticut, USA. Environmental Management 14:131–137.
Dunn, W. J. and G. R. Best. 1983. Enhancing ecological succession: 5. Seed bank survey of some Florida marshes and role of seed banks in marsh reclamation. p. 365–370.In Proceedings from the Symposium on Surface Mining. Hydrology, Sedimentology and Reclamation. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman & Hall. London, England.
Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, 2nd ed. New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, NY, USA.
Gwin, S. E. and M. E. Kentula. 1990. Evaluating design and verifying compliance of wetlands created under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in Oregon. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA EP A/60 0/3-9 0/061.
Gwin, S. E., M. E. Kentula, and D. L. Frostholm. 1991. Evaluating design and verifying compliance of created wetlands in the vicinity of Tampa, Florida. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA. EP A/60 0/3-9 1/068.
Handel, S. N., G. R. Robinson, and A. J. Beattie. 1994. Biodiversity resources for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 2:230–241.
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Harris, S. W. and W. H. Marshall. 1963. Ecology of water-level manipulation on a northern marsh. Ecology 44:331–343.
Keddy, P. A. and P. Constabel. 1986. Germination of ten shoreline plants in relation to seed size, soil particle size and water level: an experimental study. Journal of Ecology 74:133–141.
Keddy, P. A. and A. A. Reznicek. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. Journal of Great Lakes Research 12:25–35.
Kentula, M. E., R. P. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1992. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Kruczynski, W. L. 1990. Options to be considered in preparation and evaluation of mitigation plans, p. 555–570.In J. A. Kusler and M. E. Kentula (eds.) Wetland Greation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.
Kusler, J. A. and M. E. Kentula. 1990. Wetland Greation and Restoration: the Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Leck, M. A. 1989. Wetland seed banks. p. 283–305.In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
Leck, M. A. and K. J. Graveline. 1979. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal marsh. American Journal of Botany 66:1006–1015.
McDonald, A. W. 1993. The role of seed bank and sown seeds in the restoration of an English flood-meadow. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:395–400.
McKnight, S. K. 1992. Transplanted seed bank response to drawdown time in a created wetland in east Texas. Wetlands 12:79–90.
Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, 2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA.
Morin, P. J. 1987. Salamander predation, prey facilitation and seasonal succession in microcrustacean communities. p. 174–187.In W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih (eds.) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, USA.
Pickett, S. T. A. and V. T. Parker. 1994. Avoiding the old pitfalls: opportunities in a new discipline. Restoration Ecology 2:75–79.
Reed, P. B. Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that occur in wetlands: 1988 New Jersey. National Wetlands Inventory, US Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL, USA. Biological Report PB90-13940
Reinartz, J. A. and E. L. Warne. 1993. Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin. Wetlands 13: 153–164.
Salisbury, E. 1970. The pioncer vegetation of exposed muds and its biological features. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 259:207–255.
Schneider, R. L. and R. R. Sharitz. 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a Southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73: 1022–1030.
Smith, L. M. and J. A. Kadlec. 1985. The effects of disturbance on marsh seed banks. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:2133–2137.
Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY, USA.
van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: A Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.
van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis, 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.
van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1979. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.
van der Valk, A. G. and R. L. Pederson. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. p. 329–346.In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
van der Valk, A. G., R. L. Pederson, and C. B. Davis. 1992. Restoration and creation of freshwater wetlands using seed banks. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:191–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vivian-Smith, G., Handel, S.N. Freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine: Seed bank recruitment dynamics and plant colonization. Wetlands 16, 185–196 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160692
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160692