Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 1987 and 1991, 1892 prairie potholes were restored in northern Iowa, southern Minnesota, and southeastern South Dakota by state and federal agencies, most as part of the Conservation Reserve Program. The total area covered by these restored wetlands is approximately 2714 ha. Most restorations are small (less than 4 ha) wetlands with a seasonal hydrologic regime. Wetlands with an ephemeral/ temporary water regime are under-represented compared to their pre-drainage extent. Information on basin morphometry, hydrology, and vegetation-zone development was collected on 62 wetlands restored in 1988. Earthen dams are installed on most (73%) restorations in the region, increasing the full pool volume but not the mean depth of the basin. Overall, restored wetlands have basin morphometries that are comparable to those of similarly sized natural wetlands. About 60% of the basins had their predicted hydrology or held water longer than predicted. Nevertheless, about 20% of the projects that we examined were hydrologic failures and either never flooded or had significant structural problems. Most restored wetlands had developed emergent and submersed aquatic vegetation zones, but only a few, had developed wet prairie and sedge meadow vegetation zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Arndt, J.L. and J.L. Richardson. 1988. Hydrology, salinity, and hydric soil development in a North Dakota prairie pothole wetland system. Wetlands 8:94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer, S.R. and W.A. Niering. 1992. Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA) Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.E. 1990. Wetlands, status and trends in the conterminous United States, mid 1970’s to mid 1980’s: first update of the national wetlands status report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delphey, P.J. and J.J. Dinsmore. 1993. Breeding bird communities of recently restored and natural prairie wetlands. Wetlands 13: 200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S.M. 1993. Site selection, design criteria, and performance assessment for wetland restorations in the prairic pothole region. Ph.D. Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S.M. and A.G. van der Valk. 1994. Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach. Iowa State University Press, Ame, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S.M. and A.G. van der Valk. 1995. Natural revegetation during restoration of wetlands in the southern prairie pothole region if North America. p. 129–142.In B.D. Wheeler, S.S. Shaw, W.J. Foyt, and R.A. Robertson (eds.) Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S.M. and A.G. van der Valk. 1996. The vegetation of restored prairic wetlands. Ecological Applications 6:109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenhart, T. 1992. Transformation and fate of non-point source nitrate loads in northern prairie wetlands. Ph.D. Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, 1989. Vegetation of wetlands of the prairie pothole region. p. 132–187.In A.G. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, C.R. 1988. Wetland restoration in western Minnesota. p. 92–94In J. Zelazney and J.S. Feierabend (eds.) Increasing Our Wetland Resources. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dumbois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSS (National Cooperative Soil Survey). 1979. Houghton Series Description. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1989. Weekly Climate Bulletin. Vol. 89/23 and Vol. 89/36. U.S. Department of Commerce, Climate Analysis Center, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1990. Weekly Climate Bulletin. Vol. 90/25 and Vol. 90/37. U.S. Department of Commerce, Climate Analysis Center, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1991 Weekly Climate Bulletin. Vol. 91/24 and Vol. 91/36 U.S. Department of Commerce, Climate Analysis Center, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, R.K. and J.L. Baker. 1989. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and the fate of agricultural runoff. p. 92–131.In A.G. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onstad, C.A., M.R. Burkhart, and G.D. Bubenzer. 1991. Agricultural research to improve water quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46:184–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCS (Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff). 1975, Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 436. Washington, DC, USA.

  • Stewart, R.E. and H.A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC, USA. Resource Publication 92.

  • SURFER, 1985. SURFER (A Three Dimensional Computer Analysis Program). Golden Software, Inc., Golden, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taff, S.J. 1988. Minnesota’s RIM Reserve: how does it stack up against CRP? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43:82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, T.A. 1989. Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Wetlands Restoration Program. p. 131–135.In National Symposium on Protection of Wetlands from Agricultural Impact. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galatowitsch, S.M., van der Valk, A.G. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16, 75–83 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160647

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160647

Key Words

Navigation