Skip to main content

Effects of irrigation on seed production and vegetative characteristics of four moist-soil plants on impounded wetlands in California

Abstract

We examined the effects of irrigation on 4 moist-soil plants commonly managed for waterfowl in the Sacramento Valley, California. Irrigation resulted in taller and heavier swamp timothy (Heleochloa schoenoides), pricklegrass (Crypsis niliaca), and sprangletop (Leptochloa fasicularis). Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) grew taller in irrigated wetlands, but no significant difference in weight was detected. Only sprangletop yielded larger seed masses in response to irrigation. Without irrigation, swamp timothy and pricklegrass assumed a typical prostrate growth form, but with irrigation, they assumed a vertical growth form. Irrigation did not significantly affect plant density. Because of rising water costs, wetland managers should consider wildlife management objectives and plant responses before implementing irrigation practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  • Begg, E.L. 1968. Soil survey Glenn County, California. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabreck, R.H. 1979. Wintering habitat of dabbling ducks—physical, chemical and biological aspects. p. 133–142.In T.A. Bookhout (ed.) Waterfowl and wetlands: an integrated review. Proceedings 1977 Symposium, North Central Section, The Wildlife Society. Madison, WI, USA.

  • Connelly, D.P. 1979. Propagation of selected marsh plants in the San Joaquin Valley. Wildlife Management Leaflet. No. 15. California Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, D.P. and D.L. Chesemore. 1980. Food habits of pintails,Anas acuta, wintering on seasonally flooded wetlands in the northern San Joaquin Valley, California. California Fish and Game 66:191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N.H., Jr. and S.W. Harris. 1987. Feeding ecology of northern pintails and green-winged teal wintering in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:724–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, L.H. and T.S. Taylor. 1982. Management of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. Resource Publication #148. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, D.S., M.R. Miller, R.D. Bauer, and J.R. LeDonne. 1982. California’s Central Valley wintering waterfowl: concerns and challenges. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 47:441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, M.E. and L.H. Fredrickson. 1981. Do wetland conditions in the Mississippi Delta hardwoods influence mallard recruitment? Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 46:44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M.R. 1987. Fall and winter foods of northern pintalls in the Sacramento Valley, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, G.A. and D.E. Johnson. 1984. Analysis of messy data, Volume 1: Designed Experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Analysis System (SAS). 1985. SAS user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1978. Concept plan for waterfowl wintering habitat preservation—Central Valley, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986. North American waterfowl management plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mushet, D.M., Euliss, N.H. & Harris, S.W. Effects of irrigation on seed production and vegetative characteristics of four moist-soil plants on impounded wetlands in California. Wetlands 12, 204–207 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160610

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160610

Key Words

  • California
  • grasses
  • hydrophytes
  • irrigation
  • moist-soil management
  • seed production
  • wetlands