Skip to main content
Log in

Perturbation theoretical vs supermolecule calculations on intermolecular interactions

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Published:
Acta Physica Hungarica

Abstract

Perturbation theoretical and variational supermolecule calculations are performed for some model systems, such as He…He, H2…H2, and water-water dimers. The symmetry adapted second order PT calculations used in this paper are free of basis set superposition error, but the PT results are sensitive to the basis set and may show wrong R→0 asymptotics. Supermolecule calculations can only be compared to the PT results at thelong range, where the latter involve less approximation and are inherently free from BSSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. R. Kestner, J. Chem. Phys.,48, 252, 1968.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. For a recent review, see J. H. van Lenthe, J. G. C. M. van Duijneveldt-van de Rijdt, and F. B. van Duijneveldt, Adv. Chem. Phys.,69, 521, 1987; Sh. K. Loushin, S. Liu and C. E. Dykstra, J. Chem. Phys.,84, 2720, 1986; see also [4].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Gutowski, F. B. van Duijneveldt, G. Chalasinski and L. Piela, Chem. Phys. Letters,129, 325, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Collins and G. A. Gallup, Chem. Phys. Letters,129, 329, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys.,19, 553, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. Daudey, P. Claverie and J.-P. Malrieu, Intern. J. Quant. Chem.,8, 1, 1974, J. P. Daudey, J.-P. Malrieu and O. Rojas,ibid Intern. J. Quant. Chem.,8, 17, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Johansson, P. Kollman and S. Rothenberg, Theor. Chim. Acta,29 167, 1973; P. Carsky and M. Urban, Ab initio calculations, Lecture Note in Chemistry No. 16, Springer, Berlin, 1980, p. 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. R. Surján and R. A. Poirier, Chem. Phys. Letters,128, 358, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. H. van Lenthe, T. van Dam, F. B. van Duijneveldt and L. M. T. Kroon-Batenburg, Faraday Symp.,19, 125, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Osman, S. Topiol and H. Weinstein, J. Comput. Chem.,2, 73, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. H. Smit, J. L. Derissen and F. B. van Duijneveldt, Mol Phys.,37, 501, 1979; E. Kochanski and D. R. Flower, Chem. Phys.,57, 217, 1981; J. R. Collins and G. A. Gallup, Chem. Phys. Letters,123, 56, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. A. Sokalski, P. C. Hariharan and J. J. Kaufman, J. Comput. Chem.,4, 506, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Van der Avoird, Chem. Phys. Lett.,1, 429, 1967, A. T. Amos and J. I. Musher, Chem. Phys. Lett.,1, 149, 1967; J. O. Hirshfelder, Chem. Phys. Lett.,1, 363, 1967; J. N. Murrell and G. Shaw, J. Chem. Phys.,46, 1768, 1967; K. Salewicz and B. Jeziorski, Mol. Phys.,38, 191, 1979.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Kochanski and J. F. Gouyet, Theor. Chim. Acta.,39, 329, 1975; Mol. Phys.,29, 693, 1975; J. F. Gouyet, J. Chem. Phys.,59, 4637, 1975; E. Kochanski in: Intermolecular Forces, Proc. 14th Jerusalem Symp., 1981, Ed. B. Pullman, p. 15; E. Kochanski, J. Chem. Phys.,58, 5223, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Mayer, Int. J. Quant. Chem.,23, 341, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. R. Surján, I. Mayer and L. Lukovits, Chem. Phys. Letters,119, 538, 1985.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Gutowski, J. H. van Lenthe, T. Verbeck, F. B. van Duijneveldt and G. Calasinski, Chem. Phys. Letters,124, 370, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. D. B. Cook, Mol. Phys.,53, 645, 1984.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Otto and J. Ladik, Chem. Phys.,8, 192, 1975;19, 209, 1977; (b): P. Otto, Int. J. Quant. Chem.,28, 895, 1984; (c): H. Weinstein, J. E. Eilers and S.-Y. Chang, Chem. Phys. Letters,51, 534, 1977.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. McWeeny, Proc. Roy. Soc. London,A523, 242, 1959.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Saebo and P. Pulay, Chem. Phys. Letts.,113, 13, 1985.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Stollhoff and P. Vasilopoulos, J. Chem. Phys.,84, 2744, 1986.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Zirz and R. Ahlrichs, in: Proceedings of the Daresbury Study Weekend on Correlation, Daresbury, November 1979, eds. M. F. Guest and S. Wilson, Science Research Council DL/SCI/R14 (1980); R. Ahlrichs, in: Methods in computational molecular physics, eds. G. H. F. Diercksen and S. Wilson, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983; W. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys.,58, 1017, 1972; Intern. J. Quantum Chem.,S5, 341, 1971; P. Pulay, Intern. J. Quantum Chem. Symp.,17, 257, 1983; P. Pulay and S. Saebo, Chem. Phys. Letters,117, 37, 1985.

  24. N. C. Handy, J. D. Goddard and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys.,71, 426, 1979.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. R. Langhoff and E. R. Davidson, Int. J. Quant. Chem.8, 61, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. A. Chiles and L. E. Dykstra, J. Chem. Phys.,74, 4544, 1981; Chem. Phys. Letts.,80, 69, 1981.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. S. Binkley, J. A. Pople, and W. J. Hehre, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,102, 939, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Pulay, Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berlin),50, 299, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. V. R. Saunders and M. F. Guest, ATMOL3/ATMOL-4 program system, 1976, 1982, 1985; J. H. van Lenthe, Supercomputer,5, 33, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MONSTERGAUSS (MUN version): M. R. Peterson and R. A. Poirier, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Ontario and Chemistry Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X7.

  31. GAUSSIANSO: J. S. Binkley, R. Whiteside, R. Krishnan, H. B. Schlegel, D. J. Defrees, J. A. Pople, QCPE,13, 406, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  32. PROGRAM INTERMOL: P. R. Surján, Department of Chemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X7.

  33. J. F. Gouyet, unpublished results, 1976.

  34. E. Kochanski, personal communication.

  35. I. C. Hayes and A. J. Stone, Mol. Phys.,53, 83, 1984.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. S-Y. Chang and H. Weinstein, Int. J. Quant. Chem.,14, 801, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. I. Mayer and P. R. Surján, J. Chem. Phys.,80, J649, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. H. F. Diercksen, Theor. Chim. Acta,21, 335, 1971; see also [29b].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Krishan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys.,72, 650, 1980.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. F. B. Brown, D. W. Schwenke and D. G. Truhlar, Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berlin),68, 23, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Gutowski, J.-H. van Lenthe, J. Verbeek, J. G. C. M. van Duijneveldt-van de Rijdt and F. B. van Duijneveldt, to be published.

  42. R. Feltgen, H. Kirst, K. A. Kohler and H. Pauly, J. Chem. Phys.,76, 2360, 1982.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Surján, P.R., Császár, P., Poirier, R.A. et al. Perturbation theoretical vs supermolecule calculations on intermolecular interactions. Acta Physica Hungarica 67, 387–400 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03155820

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03155820

Keywords

Navigation