Skip to main content
Log in

CNDO/2 calculations on the ethylenecyclobutane cycloaddition reaction

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Published:
Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae

Abstract

Six different ethylene-cyclobutane reaction pathways were studied by the CNDO/2/CI method with full geometry optimization. It was established that the geometries of the various intermediates and transition states stand well the comparison with the results of theab initio calculations. A new procedure is suggested for finding the saddle points on the reaction hypersurface. A new cis intermediate was found with no direct transition into the cyclobutane molecule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. P. Marchand andR. Liehr eds, Pericyclic Reactions, Academic Press, New York-London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Gusten andE. F. Ullmann, Chem. Commun.,28, 1970.

  3. Shyonogi & Co, Jap. Patent,7, 108, 860, 1971.

  4. De Schryver, W. J. Feast andG. Smets, J. Polymer Sci.,A-1, 8, 1939, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Mizuno andS. Hattori, J. Optical Soc. Am.,57, 1651, 1977.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. D. Cohen andG. M. J. Schmidt, J. Chem. Soc., 2041, 1964.

  7. U. K. Setlow, Progr. in Nucleic Acid Res.,8, 257, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Helene, Photochem. Photobiol.,18, 255, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Dall ’Aqua, S. Marciani, L. Caviatta andG. Rodighiero, Z. Naturf.,26 b, 561, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Reske andJ. Stauff, Z. Naturf.,20 b, 15, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. Varghese, Biochemistry,10, 2194, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Sorm andJ. Skoda, Acta Unio Contra Cancrum,20, 37, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Grünberger andF. Sorm, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun.,28, 1044, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Raksányi, P. Császár andL. Harsányi, J. Molecular Structure,60, 347, 1980.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Raksányi, I. Földvári, J. Fidy andL. Kittler, Biopolymers,17, 887, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Fidy andK. Raksányi, Studia Biophys,71, 137, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. B. Woodward andR. Hoffmann, The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry, Verlag Chemie-Academic Press, Weinheim, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. N. Houk, Pericyclic Reactions, Academic Press, New York-London, H. P. Marchand and R. Liehr eds, 181, 1977.

  19. K. Fukui andH. Fujimoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan,41, 1989, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. E. Zimmermann, Pericyclic reactions, H. P. Marchand and R. Liehr eds, Academic Press, New York-London, 63, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Fukui, Molecular Orbitals in Chemistry, Physics and Biology, P. O. Löwdin and B. Pullmann eds. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Hoffmann, S. Swaminathan, B. Rodell andR. Gleiter, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,92, 7091, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. S. Wright andL. Salem, Chem. Commun., 1370, 1969.

  24. E. M. Evleth andG. Feler, Chem. Phys. Letters,22, 499, 1973.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Yamaguchi andT. Fueno, Chem. Phys. Letters,22, 466, 1973.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. J. S. Dewar, A. C. Griffin andS. Kirschner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,96, 6225, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. J. S. Dewar andS. Kirschner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,96, 5246, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Jug andH. W. Krüger, Theoret. Chim. Acta,52, 19, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. A. Segal, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,96, 7892, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. R. E. Townshend, G. Rammuni, G. A. Segal, W. J. Hehre andL. Salem, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,98, 2190, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. A. Burke, G. Leroy andM. Sana, Theoret. Chim. Acta,40, 313, 1975;44, 219, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. L. A. Burke andG. Leroy, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg.,88, 379, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Jean, Quant. Theor. Chem. Reactions,1, 53, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Caramella, K. N. Houk andL. N. Domelsmith, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,99, 4511, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. B. Pulay andF. Török, Mol. Physics,25, 1153, 1973.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. V. Basilevski, V. Shamov andV. A. Tikhomirov, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,99, 1369, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Coffey andK. Jug, Theoret. Chim. Acta,34, 213, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Rinaldi, Computers and Chemistry,1, 109, 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Fletcher andM. J. D. Powell, Computer J.,6, 163, 1963.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. B. A. Murtagh andR. W. H. Sargent, Computer J.,13, 185, 1970.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. H. B. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys.,47, 3407, 1967.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof.R. Gáspár on his 60th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raksányi, K., Farkas, M., Fidy, J. et al. CNDO/2 calculations on the ethylenecyclobutane cycloaddition reaction. Acta Physica 51, 51–64 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03155564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03155564

Keywords

Navigation