Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychologische behandelingen: effectiviteit en gemeenschappelijke factoren

  • Artikelen
  • Published:
Directieve therapie

Samenvatting

Dit artikel verschijnt eind 2010 als hoofdstuk in het Handboek voor GZ-psychologen onder redactie van M. Verbraak, S.Visser, P. Muris en K. Hoogduin bij Boom uitgeverij, Amsterdam. Het artikel beschrijft hoe non-specifieke therapeutische variabelen, zoals het creëren van hoop, het motiveren van de cliënt, het bieden van een duidelijke en geloofwaardige therapierationale, en een optimale therapeutische relatie evidence-based behandelingen effectiever maken.

Abstract

This article will be published at the end of 2010 as a chapter in the Dutch treatment manual voor Healthcare psychologists (Handboek voor GZ-psychologen) under editorial staff of M. Verbraak, S. Visser, P. Muris en K. Hoogduin at Boom uitgeverij, Amsterdam. The article describes how non-specific therapeutic variables (creating hope, motivating, giving a clear and trustworthy rationale and creating a good therapeutic relationship) make evidence-based treatments more effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Referenties

  • Atkins, D.C., Bedics, J.D., McGlinchey, J.B., & Beauchaine, T.P. (2005). Assessing clinical significance: Does it matter which method we use? Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 982-989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L.E., Machado, P.P., & Allstetter Neufeldt, S. (1994). Therapist variables. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (red.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4e druk), pp. 229-269. New York: John Wiley.

  • Björn, P. (2009). Comparing apples and oranges: How do patient characteristics and treatment goals vary between different forms of psychotherapy? Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 82, 323-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaauw, E., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (1994). The therapeutic relationship: A study on the value of the Therapist Client Rating Scale. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22, 25-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S.J., Sanislow, C.A., Zuroff, D.C., & Pilkonis, P.A. (1996). Characteristics of effective therapists: Further analysis of data from the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 1276-1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A.C., Elliott, R.L., Greenberg, L.S., & Watson, J.C. (2002). Empathy. In J.C. Norcross (ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Buckner, J.D. & Schmidt, N.B. (2009). A randomized pilot study of motivation enhancement therapy to increase utilization of cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety. Behaviour research & Therapy, 47, 710-715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D.L., & Hollon, S.D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D.L., & Ollendick, T.H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2e druk). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Chrits-Christoph, P., & Mintz, J. (1991). Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 59, 20-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (1975). Effects of expectancy on systematic desensitization and flooding. European Journal of Behavioural Analysis and Modification, 1, 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2004). Behavior therapy with adults. In M. Lambert (ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5e druk), pp. 393-446. Wiley: New York.

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G., Ehring, T., & Powers, M.B. (2009). Philosophy, psychology, causes, and treatments of mental disorders. In Kazantis, N., Reinecke, M.A., & Freeman, A. (eds.), Cognitive and Behavior Theories in Clinical Practice, pp. 1-27. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G., & Kamphuis, J.H. (2007). Personality Disorders. Hove/New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G., & Dyck, R. van. Psychotherapie: effectiviteit en indicatiestelling. (2006). In Vandereycken, W., Hoogduin, C.A.L., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (red.). Handboek Psychopathologie, deel II: Klinische Praktijk, pp. 83-98. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G., & Vedel, E. (2007). Alcohol en drugsgebruik: Een gids voor effectief gebleken behandelingen. Nieuwezijds: Amsterdam.

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G., & Walta, C. (1978). The effects of therapy-set on electrical aversion therapy and covert sensitization. Behaviour Therapy, 9, 185-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.D. (1976). Psychotherapy and the sense of mastery. In R.L. Spitzer & D.F. Klein (Eds.), Evaluation of psychotherapies, pp. 47-56. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Greenberg, R.P., Constantino, M.J., & Bruce, N. (2006). Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome? Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 657-678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A.O., & Bedi, R.P. (2002). The alliance. In J.C. Norcross (ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships that work (pp. 37-69). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Ingram, R.E., Hayes, A., & Scott, W. Empirically supported treatments: A critical analysis. In C.R. Snyser & R.E. Ingram (red.), Handbook of Psychological Change: Psychotherapy proceses & practices for the 21st century, pp. 40-60. New York: Wiley.

  • Jacobson, N.S., Follette, W.C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P., & Wheeler-Anderson, C. (2000). The long and short of psychological change: Towards a goal-centered understanding of treatment durability and adaptive success. In C.R. Snyser & R.E. Ingram (red.), Handbook of Psychological Change: Psychotherapy proceses & practices for the 21st century, 154-176. New York: Wiley.

  • Kazdin, A.E., Whitley, M., & Marciano, P.L. (2006). Child-therapist and parent-therapist alliance and therapeutic change in the treatment of children referred for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 436-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P.C., Comer, J.S., Marker, C.D. Creed, T.A., Puliafico, A.C., Hughes, A.A., Martin, E.D., Suveg, C., & Hudson, J. (2009). In-session exposure tasks and therapeutic alliance across the treatment of childhood anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 517-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M.H., Kolden, G.G., Michels, J.L., & Chisholm-Stockard, S. (2002). In J.C. Norcross (ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lambert, M.J., & Barley, D.E. (2002). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. In J.C. Norcross (ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp.17-32). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lambert, M.J., & Ogles, B.M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. Lambert (ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5e druk), pp. 139-193. Wiley: New York.

  • Luborsky, L., Crist-Christoph, P., Mintz, J., & Auerbach, A. (1988). Who will benefit from psychotherapy? New York: Basic Books.

  • Martin, D.J., Graske, J.P., & Davis, M.K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerbröker, K., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2008). Therapeutic processes in virtual reality exposure therapy: The role of cognitions and the therapeutic alliance. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 1, 247-257.

  • NICE guideline (2009). CG 78: Borderline personality disorder: treatment and management. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

  • Orlinsky, D.E., Ronnestad, M.H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. Lambert (ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5e druk), pp. 307-390. Wiley: New York.

  • Powers, M.B., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2009). Dissemination of research findings. In D.C.S. Richard & S.K. Huprich (eds.). Clinical psychology: assessment, treatment and research, (pp. 495-524). New York: Academic Press.

  • Price, C., Anderson, P., Henrich, C.C., & Rothbaum, B.O. (2008). Greater expectations: using hierarchical linear modeling to examine expectancy for treatment outcome as a predictor of treatment response. Behavior Therapy, 39, 398-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raue, P.J., & Goldfried, M.R. (1994). The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavior therapy. In A.O. Horvath & L.S. Greenberg (red.), The working alliance, pp. 131-152. New York: John Wiley.

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, C., Bennun, I., Schindler, L., & Hoogduin, C.A.L. (1993). The therapeutic relationship in behavioural psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley.

  • Shelef, K. & Diamond, G.M. (2008). Short form of the revised vanderbilt therapeutic alliance scale: Development, reliability, and validity. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 433-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, S.R., Gudmundsen, G., Kaplinski, H.C., & McMakin, D.L. (2008). Alliance and outcome in cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(3), 631-639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, S.R., & Karver, M. (2003). Prediction of treatment outcome from relationship variables in child and adolescent therapy: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 71, 452-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R.E., & Chambless, D.J. (2009). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders in clinical practice: A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 595-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepka, C., Rees, A., Shapiro, D.A., Hardy, G.E. and Barkham, M. (2004). Therapist competence and outcome of cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 143-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, E. & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. Psychological treatments for borderline personality disorder: Are all treatments equal or are some treatments more equal than others? Personality and Mental Health, 4, 50-54.

  • Wampold, B.E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Westen, D., Novotny, C.M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westra, H.A., Arkowitz, H., & Dozois, D.J.A. (2007). Adding a motivational interviewing pretreatment to cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1106-1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westra, H.A., Dozois, D.J.A., & Marcus, M. (2007). Early improvement, expectancy, and homework compliance as predictors of outcome in cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 363-373.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. www.bsl.nl/shop/directieve-therapie-0167-238x.html

    Paul M. G. Emmelkamp

Authors
  1. Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ellen Vedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Prof. dr. Paul M.G. Emmelkamp, akademiehoogleraar KNAW, Afdeling Klinische Psychologie, Universiteit van Amsterdam & De Waag, Amsterdam.

Dr. Ellen Vedel, behandelcoördinator Jellinek Curatieve Verslavingszorg, Arkin, Amsterdam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emmelkamp, P.M.G., Vedel, E. Psychologische behandelingen: effectiviteit en gemeenschappelijke factoren. DITH 30, 113–126 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03096227

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03096227

Search

Navigation