Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

OSCE: objective structured clinical examination

  • Artikelen
  • Published:
Bijblijven

Samenvatting

OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) is een toetsvorm voorgesteld in 1975 door Harden met als doel het meten van klinische competenties in een vaste setting van een student, een observator en een (gestandaardiseerde) patiënt. Bij de ontwikkeling van een OSCE dient een blauwdruk opgesteld te worden waarin de toetsvorm wordt gerelateerd aan de te meten competenties en leerdoelen. Om een voldoende hoge betrouwbaarheid en validiteit te verkrijgen, dient de OSCE te bestaan uit meerdere stations met ervaren observatoren. De OSCE speelt een belangrijke rol in het leerproces van de vaardigheden maar is wat betreft praktische haalbaarheid kost- en arbeidsintensief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examinations. BMJ 1975;1:447-51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wass V, Vleuten C van der, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet 2001;357:945-49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vleuten CPM van der, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;39:309-17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barman A. Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005;34:478-82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007;356:387-96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crossley T, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ 2002;36:800-4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smee S. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Skill based assessment. BMJ 2003;326:703-6.

  8. Cohen R, Rothman AI, Poldre P, Ross J. Validity and generalizability of global ratings in an objective sctructured clinical examination. Acad Med 1991;66:545-8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 1998;73:993-7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med 1999;74:1129-34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodges B, McIllroy JH. Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training. Med Educ 2003;37:1012-6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frank C. Evidence-based checklists for objective structured clinical examinations. BMJ 2006;33:546-8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hodges B. Validity and the OSCE. Med Teacher 2003;25:250-4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peeraer G, Muijtjens AMM, De Winter BY, Remmen R, Hendrickx K, Bossaert L, et al. Unintentional blindness for experience in senior undergraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scoring? Med Educ, 2007, submitted.

  15. Reznick RK, Smee S, Baumber JS, Cohen R, Rothman A, Blackmore D, et al. Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination. Acad Med 1993;68:513-7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Humphrey-Murto S, Wood TJ, Touchie C. Why do physicians volunteer to be OSCE examiners? Med Teacher 2005;27:172-4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Newble DI, Hoare J, Sheldrake PF. The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations. Med Educ 1980;14:345-9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hodges B. OSCE! Variations on a theme by Harden. Med Educ 203;37:1134-40.

  19. Remmen R, Derese A, Scherpbier A, Denekens J, Hermann I, Vleuten C van der, et al. Can medical schools rely on clerkships to train students in basic clinical skills? Med Educ 1999;33:600-5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peeraer G, Scherpbier A, Remmen R, De Winter B, Hendrickx K, Van Petegem P, et al. Clinical skills and curriculum change: pre and post evaluation. J Health, 2007 [in press].

  21. Hendrickx K, De Winter BY, Wyndaele JJ, Tjalma WAA, Debaene L, Selleslags B, et al. Intimate examination teaching with volunteers: implementation and assessment at the University of Antwerp. Pat Educ Counsel 2006;63:47-54.

  22. Hendrickx K, De Winter BY, Tjalma W, Avonts D, Peeraer G, Wyndaele JJ. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students’ performance. Med Teacher, 2007, submitted.

  23. Junger J, Schafer S, Roth C, Schellberg D, Friedman Ben-David M, Nikendei C. Effects of basic clinical skills training on objective sctructured clinical examination performance. Med Educ 2005;39:1015-20.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. www.bsl.nl/shop/bijblijven-0168-9428.html

    B. Y. De Winter

Authors
  1. B. Y. De Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Bijlage

Bijlage

NAAM STUDENT: . . ... . . OBSERVATOR: . . .. . ..

Scoringslijst STATION: hart & vaten – hart/bloeddruk  
Full size table
Globale beoordeling van de student  
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Winter, B.Y. OSCE: objective structured clinical examination. BIJB 23, 41–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03087579

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03087579

Search

Navigation