Abstract
After the implantation of the first pacemakers in the Netherlands, controlling the quality of the implantation procedure and the device became an important issue for cardiologists, technicians and manufacturers. Over the years, the cooperation between the different workers in this field led to the development of new devices and novel features in the pacemakers, ensuring improvement in the quality of life of the pacemaker patient. This article gives an impression of how registration in national and local novel systems contributed to this development. (Neth Heart J 2008;16 (Suppl 1):S9-S11.)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dijk WA, Hooijschuur CAM, Dassen WRM. Central Pacemaker Registry in the Netherlands, a 10 year evaluation, Computers in Cardiology, Jerusalem 1989: IEEE Computer Society: 293.
Hooijschuur CAM, Dijk WA. Uniform Pacemaker and ICD Information System in the Netherlands, Conference International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics I, Atlanta 2003.
Dijk WA, Kingma T, Hooijschuur CAM, et al. Validation of the Netherlands Pacemaker Patient Registry, Computers in Cardiology, Lund Sweden 1997, Volume, Issue, 7-10 Sep: 653-6.
Dijk WA, Hooijschuur CAM, van der Velde W, Dassen WRM. A proposal for a standard communication protocol for pacemaker/ ICD programmers, Computers in Cardiology, 2005 Lyon, Volume, Issue, Sept. 25-28,2005:387-90.
Van Eck JWM, van Hemel, NM, Grobbee, DE, Buskens E, Moons KGM. Followpace study: a prospective study of the cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker, EUROPACE 2006;8:60-4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
University Medical Center Groningen, SPRN, Groningen, the Netherlands
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hooijschuur, C.A.M., Dijk, W.A. Impact of data collected on implanted devices and device recipients. NHJL 16, 7–9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086197
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086197