Skip to main content
Log in

PCI comes to age as age increasingly comes to PCI

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Netherlands Heart Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved as the standard procedure for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and for the majority of situations with stable coronary artery disease. Patients aged 75 and older represent one third of those hospitalised with acute ischaemic events and account for more than half of all cardiac deaths. 1 However, evidence-based data to guide coronary revascularisation in the elderly have been limited to 1) the randomised clinical trials that routinely under-enrol elderly patients, and 2) observational studies that represent single institution experience with small samples. 2 Nevertheless, the Western society is an ageing population and the percentage of the population above 80 years of age, the so-called octogenarians, is rapidly increasing in Europe and will almost triple by 2050. 3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. A two-decades (1975-1995) long experience in the incidence in-hospital and long term case-fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1533-9.

  2. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patiens of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1334-9.

  3. Ministry for internal affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany http://www.bmi.bund.de/nn_882848/Internet/Navigation/DE/Themen/Bevoelkerungsentwicklung/bevoelkerungsentwicklung_node.html_nnn=true

  4. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, Grosswald R, Weintraub WS, O’Neil WW, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Results in 7,472 octogenerians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:723-30.

  5. Günal A, Aengevaeren WRM, Gehlmann HR, Luijetn JE, Bos JS Verheugt FWA. Outcome and quality of life one year after percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Neth Heart J 2008;16:117-22.

  6. Yan BP, Gurvitch R, Duffy SJ, Clark DJ, Sebastian M, New G, et al. An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:928-36.

  7. Mehta RH, Granger CB, Alexander KP, Bossone E, White HD, Sketch Jr MH. Reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: benefits and risks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:471-8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Waltenberger.

Additional information

Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Hospital, and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: J. Waltenberger Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Institute of Maastricht (CARIM), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waltenberger, J., Vainer, J. PCI comes to age as age increasingly comes to PCI. NHJL 16, 115–116 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086128

Navigation