Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid approach for complex coronary artery and valve disease: a clinical follow-up study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Netherlands Heart Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For patients suffering from complex coronary artery disease (CAD) with or without concomitant valve disease, no evidence is available in the current guidelines to propose a predefined treatment regimen. We sought to assess the clinical impact of an unconventional or extended definition of the hybrid approach that combines percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiac surgery in subjects suffering from severe solitary CAD or combined with valve disease.

Between July 2002 and August 2004, 18 consecutive patients with complex CAD with or without significant valve disease who qualified for a hybrid approach were enrolled in a clinical follow-up study. Four patients eventually did not complete the proposed interventions. One patient refused treatment after inclusion, one patient died before treatment could be undertaken and two patients died after surgery but before PCI. In the other 14 cases combined treatment was technically successful. After a mean follow-up period of 15±5 months two patients had died, one due to sudden cardiac death and one of a noncardiac cause. No other major adverse clinical events were reported. A marked increase in quality of life was reported in those alive.

Hybrid approach had a favourable long-term outcome in patients with complex cardiovascular disease undergoing successful treatment; however, this was observed at the expense of significant periprocedural mortality in these high-risk subjects. Therefore we believe that hybrid approaches may provide an alternative for selected cases. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:329-34.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, Bosco G, Calafiore AM. Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularization. Lancet 1996;347:757-8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reichenspurner H, Gulielmos V, Daniel WG, Schuler S. Minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:67-8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diegeler A, Falk V, Walther T, Mohr FW. Minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery without extracorporeal circulation. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1454.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrich GJ, Bonatti J, Dapunt OE. Preliminary experience with minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery combined with coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1454-5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mack MJ, Brown DL, Sankaran A. Minimally invasive coronary bypass for protected left main coronary stenosis angioplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:545-6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benetti FJ, Ballester C. Use of thoracoscopy and a minimal thoracotomy, in mammary-coronary bypass to left anterior descending artery, without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 2 cases. J Cardiovasc Surg 1995;36:159-61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mariani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Peels JO, Monnink SH, den Heijer P, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary angioplasty for isolated type C stenosis of the left anterior descending artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:434-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amodeo VJ, Donias HW, D’Ancona G, Hoover EL, Karamanoukian HL. The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology 2002;53:665-9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D’Ancona G, Vassiliades TA, Boyd WD, Donias HW, Stahl KD, Karamanoukian H. Is hybrid coronary revascularization favored by cardiologists or cardiac surgeons? Heart Surg Forum 2002;5: 393-5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell RA, Imperial E, Kelleher P, Brunker P, Gass G. Perceived health problems in subjects with varying cardiovascular diagnoses. J Behav Med 1991,5:505-12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Byrne JG, Leacche M, Unic D, Rawn JD, Simon DI, Rogers CD, et al. Staged initial percutaneous coronary intervention followed by valve surgery (“hybrid approach”) for patients with complex coronary and valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:14-8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stahl KD, Boyd WD, Vassiliades TA, Karamanoukian HL. Hybrid robotic coronary artery surgery and angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Sur 2002;74:S1358-62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Canniere D, Jansens JL, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, Barvais L, Decroly P, Stoupel E. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with “on-pump” double bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2001;142:563-70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cisowski M, Morawski W, Drzewiecki J, Kruczak W, Toczek K, Bis J, et al. Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:261-5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wittwer T, Cremer J, Boonstra P, Grandjean J, Mariani M, Mugge A, et al. Myocardial “hybrid” revascularisation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: preliminary results of a multicentre study. Heart 2000;83:58-63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen HA, Zenati M, Smith AJ, Lee JS, Chough S, Jafar Z, et al. Feasibility of combined percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 1998;98:1048-50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riess FC, Bader R, Kremer P, Kuhn C, Kormann J, Mathey D, et al. Coronary hybrid revascularization from January 1997 to January 2001: a clinical follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1849-55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Presbitero P, Gallotti R, Belli G. “Hybrid” and combined percutaneous and surgical intervention to treat selected cardiac patients: a new strategy. G Ital Cardiol 1999;29:27-33.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lloyd CT, Calafiore AM, Wilde P, Ascione R, Paloscia L, Monk CR, et al. Integrated left anterior small thoracotomy and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:908-12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Farhat F, Depuydt F, Praet FV, Coddens J, Vanermen H. Hybrid cardiac revascularization using a totally closed-chest robotic technology and a percutaneous transluminal coronary dilatation. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:119-20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davidavicius G, Van Praet F, Mansour S, Casselman F, Bartunek J, Degrieck I, et al. Hybrid revascularization strategy: a pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flow-reserveguided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 112:I317-22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D, Murphy D, Siwek L, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2006;114:I473-6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vassiliades TA Jr, Douglas JS, Morris DC, Block PC, Ghazzal Z, Rab ST, et al. Integrated coronary revascularization with drugeluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:956-62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Us MH, Basaran M, Yilmaz M, Yaymaci B, Ulusoy E, Sanioglu S, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization in high-risk patients. Tex Heart Inst J 2006;33:458-62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Department of Cardiology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands

Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Department Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

G.A.J. Jessurun Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peels, J.O.J., Jessurun, G.A.J., Boonstra, P.W. et al. Hybrid approach for complex coronary artery and valve disease: a clinical follow-up study. NHJL 15, 329–334 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086010

Navigation